Comparison of the Factors Influencing Young Adolescents' Aggression according to Family Structure

Yun, Eun Kyoung; Shin, Sung Hee

doi:10.4040/jkan.2013.43.3.321

J Korean Acad Nurs. 2013 Jun;43(3):321-330. Korean.
Published online Jun 28, 2013.
https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2013.43.3.321

Original Article

Comparison of the Factors Influencing Young Adolescents' Aggression according to Family Structure

Eun Kyoung Yun and Sung Hee Shin

Author information

Author notes

Copyright and License

- College of Nursing Science, East-West Research Institute, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea.
Address reprint requests to: Shin, Sung Hee. College of Nursing Science, Kyung Hee University, 1 Hoegi-dong, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 130-701, Korea. Tel: +82-2-961-0917, Fax: +82-2-961-9398, Email: sunghshin@khu.ac.kr

Received December 31, 2012; Accepted February 23, 2013.

Abstract

Purpose

This cross-sectional study was done to compare factors influencing young adolescents' aggression according to family structure.

Methods

Participants were 680 young adolescents aged 11 to 15 years (113 in single father families, 136 in single mother families, 49 in grandparent families, and 382 in both-parent families). All measures were self-administered. Data were analyzed using SPSS 18.0 program and factors affecting young adolescents' aggression were analyzed by stepwise multiple regression.

Results

Levels of young adolescents' aggression and all variables were significantly different among the four family structure groups. Factors influencing young adolescents' aggression were also different according to these 4 groups. For single father families, depression-anxiety and family hardiness significantly predicted the level of young adolescents' aggression (adjusted R square=.37, p<.001). For single mother families, depression-anxiety, gender, and friends' support significantly predicted the level of young adolescents' aggression (adjusted R square=.58, p<.001). For grandparent families, depression-anxiety and family support significantly predicted the level of young adolescents' aggression (adjusted R square=.58, p<.001). For both-parent families, depression-anxiety, family hardiness, and friends' support significantly predicted the level of young adolescents' aggression (adjusted R square=.48, p<.001).

Conclusion

Nurses working with young adolescents should consider family structure-specific factors influencing aggression in this population.

Keywords

Family; Adolescent; Aggression; Depression; Anxiety

Tables

Table 1
General Characteristics and Homogeneity among the Four Groups (N=680)

Click for larger image

Table 2
Differences in Level of Variables among the Four Groups (N=680)

Click for larger image

Table 3
Partial Correlation between Aggression and Independent Variables in Four Groups (N=680)

Click for larger image

Table 4
Multiple Regression Analysis for Variables Predicting Adolescents' Aggression according to Family Type (N=680)

Click for larger image

References

1. Achenbach TM. In: Manual for child behavior checklist/4-18 and 1991 profile. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont Department of Psychiatry; 1991.
1. Barnes H, Olson DH. In: Parent-adolescent communication, family inventories. St. Paul, MN: University of Minnesota; 1982.
  Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
1. Cha YR. In: A study on the children's school adjustment. Seoul: Yonsei University; 2001.
  Unpublished master's thesis.
1. Chin MJ. Family structure and children's time use. Fam Cult 2008;20(3):187–211.
1. Cho AM, Lim YS. The differences of adolescents' psychological characteristics and status delinquency according to the family structure. J Future Oriented Youth Soc 2009;6(1):137–154.
1. Choi H, Meininger JC, Roberts RE. Ethnic differences in adolescents' mental distress, social stress, and resources. Adolescence 2006;41(162):263–283.
  PubMed
1. Dubow EF, Ullman DG. Assessing social support in elementary school children: The survey of children's social support. J Clin Child Psychol 1989;18(1):52–64.
  http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15374424jccp1801_7.
  CrossRef
1. Ha YH, Edwards CP. Causal relationships of adolescent aggression: Empathy, prosocial behavior, self-esteem, and social support. Korean J Child Stud 2004;25(2):121–132.
1. Jablonska B, Lindberg L. Risk behaviours, victimisation and mental distress among adolescents in different family structures. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2007;42(8):656–663.
  http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00127-007-0210-3.
  PubMed
  
  CrossRef
1. Jeong SH. Family structure, parent-child interactions and adolescent delinquency: Focusing on the comparison between single mother family and single father family. Korean J Soc Welf Stud 2006;30:185–213.
1. Ju SH, Cho SW. Impact of conflict and nurturing factors for the divorced parents on the behavioral adaptation of their children. Korean J Soc Welf 2004;56(4):215–238.
1. Kierkus CA, Baer D. A social control explanation of the relaionship between family structure and delinquent behaviour. Can J Criminol 2002;44(4):425–458.
1. Kim JC, Seong GJ, Choe WH. Effects of parents, teachers and friends' attachment on aggression in early adolescence. J Child Educ-Korean Soc Child Educ 2010;19(1):97–113.
1. Kim JW, Kim HJ. Relationships among children's aggression, temperament, home environment, and school adjustment. J Child Educ-Korean Soc Child Educ 2007;16(2):85–93.
1. Lee AJ. A study on the parent-child relation and psychosocial adjustment of adolescents in single parent family. Korean J Youth Stud 2000;7(1):69–93.
1. Lee HK, Kim HW. Social and psychological variables predicting elementary students' school bullying behaviors: On the bases of their gender and grade. Korean J Soc Psychol 2001;15(1):117–138.
1. Lee SA. The effects of family structure and socioeconomic background on adolescence's ego and psychological variables. Korean J Fam Welf 2007;12(1):83–103.
1. Lee SY. A study in the aggression by children and adolescents. Stud Behav Adolesc 2009;14:89–104.
1. Lee YA. A study of perceived family adaptation in patient with chronic renal failure. Korean J Nurs Query 1995;4(2):147–164.
1. McCubbin MA, McCubbin HI, Thompson AI. Family hardiness index (FHI). In: McCubbin HI, Thompson AI, McCubbin MA, editors. Family assessment: Resiliency, coping and adaptation: Inventories for research and practice. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin System; 1996. pp. 239-305.
1. Min HY. The relation between juvenile deliquency and parent-adolescent communication, family cohesion and adaptability. Korean J Child Stud 1992;13(1):112–124.
1. Min HY, Lee YJ, Kim KH. The relationship between mother-adolescent communication and adolescents' alienation in single mother-headed family and two-parent family. J Korean Home Manage Assoc 2008;26(3):15–23.
1. Oh KJ, Lee HL, Hong KY, Ha EH. In: K-CBCL: Korean children behavior checklist. Seoul: Chungangjucksung Publication; 1997.
1. Oh SH. A comparative study on family system and psycho-social characteristics among male-headed, female-headed, and normal families. J Korean Soc Child Welf 2001;12:77–107.
1. Park HS, Chung IJ, Ku IH. Adult-role burdens and socioemotional development of children in poverty. Korean J Soc Welf 2006;58(2):303–330.
1. Seo MJ, Kim KY. Types of changes in overt aggression and their predictors in early adolescents: Growth mixture modeling. Korean J Child Stud 2010;31(3):83–97.
1. Shin HS. The influence of family structure variables and family violence variables on hidden delinquency committed by students. Fam Cult 2005;17(2):63–88.
1. Shin SH. Development of a structural equation model for children's adaptation in divorced families. J Korean Acad Nurs 2010;40(1):127–138.
  http://dx.doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2010.40.1.127.
  PubMed
  
  CrossRef
1. Statistics Korea. A report of population and households. 2011 [Retrieved January 20, 2012].
  from http://kosis.kr/metadata/main.jsp?c_id=1962004.
1. Yoo AJ, Han MH. The relation of stress and perceived social support to problem behavior. Korean J Child Stud 1996;17(1):173–188.
1. Yoo AJ, Lee JS, Suh JH. Differences in the level of delinquent behaviors depending on family structures among adolescents. J Korean Home Econ Assoc 2005;43(10):91–102.