Skip to main content
Log in

Susceptible to distraction: Children lack top-down control over spatial attention capture

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Considerable evidence has indicated that adults can exert top-down control to avoid distraction by salient-but-irrelevant stimuli. However, relatively little research has explored how this ability develops across the lifespan. In the present study, we therefore assessed how well children can control the capture of spatial attention. Children (M age = 4.2 years) and adults (M age = 21.5 years) searched for target “spaceships” of a specific color while trying to ignore salient precues that either matched or mismatched the target spaceship color. The results demonstrated that children are, in fact, more vulnerable to capture by irrelevant stimuli than are adults, even after accounting for children’s overall cognitive slowing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atkinson, J., & Braddick, O. (2012). Visual attention in the first years: Typical development and developmental disorders. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 54, 589–595.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bacon, W. F., & Egeth, H. E. (1994). Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 485–496. doi:10.3758/BF03205306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belopolsky, A. V., Schreij, D., & Theeuwes, J. (2010). What is top-down about contingent capture? Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 326–341. doi:10.3758/APP.72.2.326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, J. (2012, September 3). Liking the child you love. Psychology Today. Retrieved from www.psychologytoday.com/blog/liking-the-child-you-love/201209/helping-children-and-teens-distractibility

  • Cepeda, N. J., Kramer, A. F., & Gonzalez de Sather, J. C. M. (2001). Changes in executive control across the life span: Examination of task-switching performance. Developmental Psychology, 37, 715–730.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deltour, L., Barathon, M., Quaglino, V., Vernier, M.-P., Despretz, P., Boucart, M., & Berquin, P. (2007). Children with benign epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes (BECTS) show impaired attentional control: Evidence from an attentional capture paradigm. Epileptic Disorders, 9, 32–38.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, A. V., Godwin, K. E., & Seltman, H. (2014). Visual environment, attention allocation, and learning in young children: When too much of a good thing may be bad. Psychological Science, 25, 1362–1370. doi:10.1177/0956797614533801

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Folk, C. L., Leber, A. B., & Egeth, H. E. (2002). Made you blink! Contingent attentional capture produces a spatial blink. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 741–753. doi:10.3758/BF03194741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1030–1044. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.18.4.1030

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuda, K., & Vogel, E. K. (2009). Human variation in overriding attentional capture. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 8726–8733. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2145-09.2009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gaspelin, N., Ruthruff, E., & Jung, K. (2014). Slippage theory and the flanker paradigm: An early-selection account of selective attention failures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 1257–1273. doi:10.1037/a0036179

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gaspelin, N., Ruthruff, E., Lien, M.-C., & Jung, K. (2012). Breaking through the attentional window: Capture by abrupt onsets versus color singletons. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 1461–1474. doi:10.3758/s13414-012-0343-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenaway, R., & Plaisted, K. (2005). Top-down attentional modulation in autistic spectrum disorders is stimulus-specific. Psychological Science, 16, 987–994. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01648.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, T. S., Wolfe, J. M., Alvarez, G. A., Cohen, M. A., & Kuzmova, Y. I. (2009). The speed of free will. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 2262–2288. doi:10.1080/17470210902732155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kail, R. V. (1991). Developmental change in speed of processing during childhood and adolescence. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 490–501.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kail, R. V., & Ferrer, E. (2007). Processing speed in childhood and adolescence: Longitudinal models for examining developmental change. Child Development, 78, 1760–1770.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leclercq, V., & Siéroff, E. (2013). Development of endogenous orienting of attention in school-age children. Child Neuropsychology, 19, 400–419.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lien, M.-C., Gemperle, A., & Ruthruff, E. (2011). Aging and involuntary attention capture: Electrophysiological evidence for preserved attentional control with advanced age. Psychology and Aging, 26, 188–202. doi:10.1037/a0021073

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lien, M.-C., Ruthruff, E., Goodin, Z., & Remington, R. W. (2008). Contingent attentional capture by top-down control settings: Converging evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 509–530. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.34.3.509

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lien, M.-C., Ruthruff, E., & Johnston, J. C. (2010). Attentional capture with rapidly changing attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 1–16. doi:10.1037/a0015875

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, D. J., Humphreys, G. W., & Kent, L. (2004). Visual search, singleton capture, and the control of attentional set in ADHD. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21, 661–687.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oh-Uchi, A., Kawahara, J., & Sugano, L. (2010). Attentional capture and meta-attentional judgment: A study of young children, parents, and university students. Psychologia, 53, 114–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theeuwes, J. (2010). Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection. Acta Psychologica, 135, 77–99. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.02.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Waters, A. M., Lipp, O. V., & Spence, S. H. (2004). Attentional bias toward fear-related stimuli: An investigation with nonselected children and adults and children with anxiety disorders. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 89, 320–337.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. R., Ponesse, J. S., Schachar, R. J., Logan, G. D., & Tannock, R. (1999). Development of inhibitory control across the life span. Developmental Psychology, 35, 205–213.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 202–238. doi:10.3758/BF03200774

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicholas Gaspelin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gaspelin, N., Margett-Jordan, T. & Ruthruff, E. Susceptible to distraction: Children lack top-down control over spatial attention capture. Psychon Bull Rev 22, 461–468 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0708-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0708-0

Keywords

Navigation