Skip to main content
Log in

Consciousness is not necessary for visual feature binding

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When visual information enters the brain, it is relayed to different specialized regions, processing features such as shape, color, or motion. And yet, in our conscious experience of a colored, moving shape, all the different features seem to be integrated into one unified percept. Therefore, it has been hypothesized that consciousness and feature binding share an intimate relationship. To study this relationship, we used a paradigm in which the behavioral effects of feature binding can be measured. Using masks, we investigated whether spontaneous binding between the orientation and location of a Gabor patch takes place when the Gabor patch is processed consciously or unconsciously. The results of our study suggest that orientation and location of a visually presented object are automatically integrated, even when subjects are unaware of that object. We conclude that binding and consciousness share a less intimate relationship than previously hypothesized, since consciousness is not a necessary condition for binding to occur.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Colzato, L. S., Raffone, A., & Hommel, B. (2006). What do we learn from binding features? Evidence for multilevel feature integration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 705–716.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crick, F. (1996). Visual perception: Rivalry and consciousness. Nature, 397, 485–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crick, F., & Koch, C. (1990). Towards a neurobiological theory of consciousness. Seminars in Neuroscience, 2, 263–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., Le Clec'H, G., Koechlin, E., Mueller, M., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., ... Le Bihan, D. (1998). Imaging unconscious semantic priming. Nature, 395, 597–600.

  • Dehaene, S., Jobert, A., Naccache, L., Ciuciu, P., Poline, J. B., Le Bihan, D., & Cohen, L. (2004). Letter binding and invariant recognition of masked words - Behavioral and neuroimaging evidence. Psychological Science, 15(5), 307–313.

  • Desmedt, J. E., & Tomberg, C. (1994). Transient phase-locking of 40 Hz electrical oscillations in prefrontal and parietal human cortex reflects the process of conscious somatic perception. Neuroscience Letters, 168(1–2), 126–129.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Engel, A. K., Fries, P., Konig, P., Brecht, M., & Singer, W. (1999). Temporal binding, binocular rivalry, and consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition, 8(2), 128–151.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fazio, R. H. (2001). On the automatic activation of associated evaluations: An overview. Cognition & Emotion, 15(2), 115–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A. G., Draine, S. C., & Abrams, R. L. (1996). Three cognitive markers of unconscious semantic activation. Science, 273(5282), 1699–1702.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hommel, B. (1998). Event files: Evidence for automatic integration of stimulus-response episodes. Visual Cognition, 5, 183–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hommel, B. (2004). Event files: Feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(11), 494–500.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hommel, B., & Colzato, L. S. (2009). When an object is more than a binding of its features: Evidence for two mechanisms of visual feature integration. Visual Cognition, 17, 120–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Treisman, A., & Gibbs, B. J. (1992). The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology, 24(2), 175–219.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kanwisher, N. G., McDermott, J., & Chun, M. M. (1997). The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. The Journal of Neuroscience, 17(11), 4302–4311.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, C.-Y., & Blake, R. (2005). Psychophysical magic: Rendering the visible ‘invisible’. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(8), 381–388.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keizer, A. W., Nieuwenhuis, S., Colzato, L. S., Teeuwisse, W., Rombouts, S. A. R. B., & Hommel, B. (2008). When moving faces activate the house area: an fMRI study of object-file retrieval. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 4.

  • Kristjánson, Á. (2006). Simultaneous priming along multiple feature dimensions in a visual search task. Vision Research, 46, 2554–2570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristjánson, Á. (2009). Independent and additive repetition priming of motion direction and color in visual search. Psychological Research, 73, 158–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamme, V. A. F. (2003). Why visual attention and awareness are different. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(1), 12–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lamme, V. A. F. (2010). How neuroscience will change our view on consciousness. Cognitive Neuroscience, 1(3), 204–240.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mordkoff, J. T., & Halterman, R. (2008). Feature integration without visual attention: Evidence from the correlated flankers task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(2), 385–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, J. P., Pelphrey, K. A., & McCarthy, G. (2007). Face processing without awareness in the right fusiform gyrus. Neuropsychologia, 45, 3087–3091.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Revonsuo, A. (1999). Binding and the phenomenal unity of consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition, 8(2), 173–185.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roelfsema, P. R. (2006). Cortical algorithms for perceptual grouping. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 29, 203–227.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zeki, S. (1980). Response properties of cells in the middle temporal area (area Mt) of owl monkey visual-cortex. Proceedings Of The Royal Society Of London Series B-Biological Sciences, 207(1167), 239–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeki, S., Watson, J. D. G., Lueck, C. J., Friston, K. J., Kennard, C., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1991). A direct demonstration of functional specialization in human visual cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience, 11(3), 641–649.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zmigrod, S., & Hommel, B. (2009). Auditory event files: Integrating auditory perception and action planning. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71(2), 352–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Victor A. F. Lamme is supported by an advanced investigator grant from the European Research Council. We would like to thank Simon van Gaal for his comments on the design of the experiment.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Victor A.F. Lamme.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Keizer, A.W., Hommel, B. & Lamme, V. Consciousness is not necessary for visual feature binding. Psychon Bull Rev 22, 453–460 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0706-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0706-2

Keywords

Navigation