Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Attention and implicit memory: priming-induced benefits and costs have distinct attentional requirements

  • Published:
Memory & Cognition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Attention at encoding plays a critical and ubiquitous role in explicit memory performance, but its role in implicit memory performance (i.e., priming) is more variable: some, but not all, priming effects are reduced by division of attention at encoding. A wealth of empirical and theoretical work has aimed to define the critical features of priming effects that do or do not require attention at encoding. This work, however, has focused exclusively on priming effects that are beneficial in nature (wherein performance is enhanced by prior exposure to task stimuli), and has overlooked priming effects that are costly in nature (wherein performance is harmed by prior exposure to task stimuli). The present study takes up this question by examining the effect of divided attention on priming-induced costs and benefits in a speeded picture-naming task. Experiment 1 shows that the costs, but not the benefits, are eliminated by division of attention at encoding. Experiment 2 shows that the costs (as well as the benefits) in this task are intact in amnesic participants, demonstrating that the elimination of the cost in the divided attention condition in Experiment 1 was not an artifact of the reduced availability of explicit memory in that condition. We suggest that the differential role of attention in priming-induced performance costs and benefits is linked to differences in response competition associated with these effects. This interpretation situates the present findings within a theoretical framework that has been applied to a broad range of facilitatory priming effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, C. M., & Craik, F. I. (1974). The effect of a concurrent task on recall from primary memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 107–113. doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(74)80035-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A., Lewis, V., Eldridge, M., & Thomson, N. (1984). Attention and retrieval from long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 518–540. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.113.4.518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentin, S., Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1995). Semantic processing and memory for attended and unattended words in dichotic listening: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 54–67. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.21.1.54

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cave, C. B., & Squire, L. R. (1992). Intact and long-lasting repetition priming in amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 509–520. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.18.3.509

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Craik, F. I. M., Govoni, R., Naveh-Benjamin, M., & Anderson, N. D. (1996). The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 159–180. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.125.2.159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faust, M. E., Balota, D. A., Spieler, D. H., & Ferraro, F. R. (1999). Individual differences in information-processing rate and amount: Implications for group differences in response latency. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 777–799. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.777

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fisk, A. D., & Schneider, W. (1984). Memory as a function of attention, level of processing, and automatization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 181–197. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.10.2.181

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gabrieli, J. D. E., Vaidya, C. J., Stone, M., Francis, W. S., Thompson-Schill, S. L., Fleischman, D. A., Tinklenberg, J. R., Yesavage, J. A., & Wilson, R. S. (1999). Convergent behavioral and neuropsychological evidence for a distinction between identification and production forms of repetition priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 479–498. doi:10.1037//0096-3445.128.4.479

  • Graf, P., & Mandler, G. (1984). Activation makes words more accessible, but not necessarily more retrievable. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 553–568. doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(84)90346-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graf, P., & Schacter, D. L. (1987). Selective effects of interference on implicit and explicit memory for new associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 45–53. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.13.1.45

    Google Scholar 

  • Isingrini, M., Vazou, F., & Leroy, P. (1995). Dissociation of implicit and explicit memory tests: Effect of age and divided attention on category exemplar generation and cued recall. Memory & Cognition, 23, 462–467. doi:10.3758/bf03197247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, L. L., & Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 306–340. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.110.3.306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, L. L., Woloshyn, V., & Kelley, C. (1989). Becoming famous without being recognized: Unconscious influences of memory produced by dividing attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 115–125. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.118.2.115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keane, M. M., Martin, E., & Verfaellie, M. (2009). Performance benefits and costs in forced choice perceptual identification in amnesia: Effects of prior exposure and word frequency. Memory & Cognition, 37, 655–666. doi:10.3758/Mc.37.5.655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keane, M. M., Verfaellie, M., Gabrieli, J. D. E., & Wong, B. M. (2000). Bias effects in perceptual identification: A neuropsychological investigation of the role of explicit memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 316–334. doi:10.1006/jmla.2000.2732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Light, L. L., Prull, M. W., & Kennison, R. F. (2000). Divided attention, aging, and priming in exemplar generation and category verification. Memory & Cognition, 28, 856–872. doi:10.3758/bf03198421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsolek, C. J. (2008). What antipriming reveals about priming. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 176–181. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.02.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marsolek, C. J., Deason, R. G., Ketz, N. A., Ramanathan, P., Bernat, E. M., Steele, V. R., Patrick, C. J., Verfaellie, M., & Schnyer, D. M. (2010). Identifying objects impairs knowledge of other objects: A relearning explanation for the neural repetition effect. NeuroImage, 49, 1919–1932. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.08.063

  • Marsolek, C. J., Schnyer, D. M., Deason, R. G., Ritchey, M., & Verfaellie, M. (2006). Visual antipriming: Evidence for ongoing adjustments of superimposed visual object representations. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 6, 163–174. doi:10.3758/cabn.6.3.163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moscovitch, M., Vriezen, E., & Goshen-Gottstein, Y. (1993). Implicit tests of memory in patients with focal lesions and degenerative brain disorders. In H. Spinnler & F. Boller (Eds.), Handbook of neuropsychology (Vol. 8, pp. 133–173). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan, N. W. (1998). The role of attention during encoding in implicit and explicit memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 27–47. doi:10.1037//0278-7393.24.1.27

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan, N. W., & Hartman, M. (1996). Divided attention and indirect memory tests. Memory & Cognition, 24, 453–465. doi:10.3758/bf03200934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan, N. W., & Peterson, D. (2008). Attention and implicit memory in the category-verification and lexical decision tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 662–679. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.34.3.662

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murdock, B. B., Jr. (1965). Effects of a subsidiary task on short-term memory. British Journal of Psychology, 56, 413–419. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1965.tb00983.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkin, A. J., Reid, T. K., & Russo, R. (1990). On the differential nature of implicit and explicit memory. Memory & Cognition, 18, 507–514. doi:10.3758/bf03198483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkin, A. J., & Russo, R. (1990). Implicit and explicit memory and the automatic/effortful distinction. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 2, 71–80. doi:10.1080/09541449008406198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajaram, S., Srinivas, K., & Travers, S. (2001). The effects of attention on perceptual implicit memory. Memory & Cognition, 29, 920–930. doi:10.3758/bf03195754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliff, R., Allbritton, D., & McKoon, G. (1997). Bias in auditory priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 143–152. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.23.1.143

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (1996). Bias effects in implicit memory tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 403–421. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.125.4.403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (1997). A counter model for implicit priming in perceptual word identification. Psychological Review, 104, 319–343. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.104.2.319

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliff, R., McKoon, G., & Verwoerd, M. (1989). A bias interpretation of facilitation in perceptual identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 378–387. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.15.3.378

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (1993). Implicit memory in normal human subjects. In F. Boller & J. Grafman (Eds.), Handbook of neuropsychology (Vol. 8, pp. 63–131). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouder, J. N., Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (2000). A neural network model of implicit memory for object recognition. Psychological Science, 11, 13–19. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schacter, D. L. (1987). Implicit memory: History and current status. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 501–518. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.13.3.501

    Google Scholar 

  • Schacter, D. L., Bowers, J., & Booker, J. (1989). Intention, awareness, and implicit memory: The retrieval intentionality criterion. In S. Lewandowsky, J. C. Dunn, & K. Kirsner (Eds.), Implicit memory: Theoretical issues (pp. 47–65). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitter-Edgecombe, M. (1996). The effects of divided attention on implicit and explicit memory performance. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 2, 111–125. doi:10.1017/s1355617700000965

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitter-Edgecombe, M. (1999). Effects of divided attention on perceptual and conceptual memory tests: An analysis using a process-dissociation approach. Memory & Cognition, 27, 512–525. doi:10.3758/bf03211545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. E., & Oscar-Berman, M. (1990). Repetition priming of words and pseudowords in divided attention and in amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 1033–1042. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.16.6.1033

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spataro, P., Mulligan, N., & Rossi-Arnaud, C. (2010). Effects of divided attention in the word-fragment completion task with unique and multiple solutions. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22, 18–45. doi:10.1080/09541440802685979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spataro, P., Mulligan, N. W., & Rossi-Arnaud, C. (2011). Attention and implicit memory the role of the activation of multiple representations. Experimental Psychology, 58, 110–116. doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000074

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Szymanski, K. F., & MacLeod, C. M. (1996). Manipulation of attention at study affects an explicit but not an implicit test of memory. Consciousness and Cognition: An International Journal, 5, 165–175. doi:10.1006/ccog.1996.0010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaidya, C., Gabrieli, J. D. E., Keane, M. M., Monti, L. A., Gutierrez-Rivas, H., & Zarella, M. M. (1997). Evidence for multiple mechanisms of conceptual priming on implicit memory tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1324–1343. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.23.6.1324

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Verfaellie, M., Gabrieli, J. D. E., Vaidya, C. J., Croce, P., & Reminger, S. L. (1996). Implicit memory for pictures in amnesia: Role of etiology and priming task. Neuropsychology, 10, 517–528. doi:10.1037/0894-4105.10.4.517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolford, G., & Morrison, F. (1980). Processing of unattended visual information. Memory & Cognition, 8, 521–527. doi:10.3758/bf03213771

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Grant MH70830 and the Clinical Science Research and Development Service, Department of Veterans Affairs. The authors thank Elizabeth Parks, Mary Colvin, Elizabeth Martin, Lisa Peterson, and Amanda Utevsky for research assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Wellesley College, and Memory Disorders Research Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Wellesley, MA, 02481, USA

    Margaret M. Keane

  2. Memory Disorders Research Center, VA Boston Healthcare System and Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA

    Matt E. Cruz & Mieke Verfaellie

Authors
  1. Margaret M. Keane
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Matt E. Cruz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mieke Verfaellie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Margaret M. Keane.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Keane, M.M., Cruz, M.E. & Verfaellie, M. Attention and implicit memory: priming-induced benefits and costs have distinct attentional requirements. Mem Cogn 43, 216–225 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-014-0464-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-014-0464-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation