Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Different effects of color-based and location-based selection on visual working memory

  • Published:
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the present study, we investigated how feature- and location-based selection influences visual working memory (VWM) encoding and maintenance. In Experiment 1, cue type (color, location) and cue timing (precue, retro-cue) were manipulated in a change detection task. The stimuli were color–location conjunction objects, and binding memory was tested. We found a significantly greater effect for color precues than for either color retro-cues or location precues, but no difference between location pre- and retro-cues, consistent with previous studies (e.g., Griffin & Nobre in Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 1176–1194, 2003). We also found no difference between location and color retro-cues. Experiment 2 replicated the color precue advantage with more complex color–shape–location conjunction objects. Only one retro-cue effect was different from that in Experiment 1: Color retro-cues were significantly less effective than location retro-cues in Experiment 2, which may relate to a structural property of multidimensional VWM representations. In Experiment 3, a visual search task was used, and the result of a greater location than color precue effect suggests that the color precue advantage in a memory task is related to the modulation of VWM encoding rather than of sensation and perception. Experiment 4, using a task that required only memory for individual features but not for feature bindings, further confirmed that the color precue advantage is specific to binding memory. Together, these findings reveal new aspects of the interaction between attention and VWM and provide potentially important implications for the structural properties of VWM representations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Averbach, E., & Coriell, A. S. (1961). Short-term memory in vision. Bell System Technical Journal, 40, 309–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 8, pp. 47–89). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, M. W., Pashler, H., & Anstis, S. M. (2000). The role of iconic memory in change-detection tasks. Perception, 29, 273–286. doi:10.1068/p3035

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berryhill, M. E., Richmond, L. L., Shay, C. S., & Olson, I. R. (2011). Shifting attention among working memory representations: Testing cue type, awareness, and strategic control. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 426–438. doi:10.1080/17470218.2011.604786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436. doi:10.1163/156856897X00357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chun, M. M., Golomb, J. D., & Turk-Browne, N. B. (2011). A taxonomy of external and internal attention. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 73–101. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100427

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fougnie, D., & Alvarez, G. A. (2011). Object features fail independently in visual working memory: Evidence for a probabilistic feature-store model. Journal of Vision, 11(12), 3:1–12. doi:10.1167/11.12.3

  • Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. Huntington, NY: Robert E. Krieger Publishing Company

  • Griffin, I. C., & Nobre, A. C. (2003). Orienting attention to locations in internal representations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 1176–1194. doi:10.1162/089892903322598139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Katus, T., Andersen, S. K., & Müller, M. M. (2014). Common mechanisms of spatial attention in memory and perception: A tactile dual-task study. Cerebral Cortex, 24, 707–718. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhs350

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kondo, A., & Saiki, J. (2012). Feature-specific encoding flexibility in visual working memory. PLoS ONE, 7(e50962), 1–8. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0050962

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, B.-C., Rao, A., Lepsien, J., & Nobre, A. C. (2009). Searching for targets within the spatial layout of visual short-term memory. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 8032–8038. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0952-09.2009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Landman, R., Spekreijse, H., & Lamme, V. A. F. (2003). Large capacity storage of integrated objects before change blindness. Vision Research, 43, 149–164. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(02)00402-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ling, S., Liu, T., & Carrasco, M. (2009). How spatial and feature-based attention affect the gain and tuning of population responses. Vision Research, 49, 1194–1204.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luck, S. J., & Vogel, E. K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 390, 279–281. doi:10.1038/36846

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Makovski, T., Sussman, R., & Jiang, Y. V. (2008). Orienting attention in visual working memory reduces interference from memory probes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 369–380. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.34.2.369

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matsukura, M., Luck, S. J., & Vecera, S. P. (2007). Attention effects during visual short-term memory maintenance: Protection or prioritization? Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 1422–1434. doi:10.3758/BF03192957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munneke, J., Heslenfeld, D. J., & Theeuwes, J. (2010). Spatial working memory effects in early visual cortex. Brain and Cognition, 72, 368–377. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2009.11.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nobre, A. C., Coull, J. T., Maquet, P., Frith, C. D., Vandenberghe, R., & Mesulam, M. M. (2004). Orienting attention to locations in perceptual versus mental representations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 363–373.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437–442. doi:10.1163/156856897X00366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, W. A. (1974). On the distinction between sensory storage and short-term visual memory. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 283–290. doi:10.3758/BF03203943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R., & Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 160–174. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.109.2.160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rensink, R. A., O’Regan, J. K., & Clark, J. J. (1997). To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological Science, 8, 368–373. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00427.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, B. K., Vogel, E. K., Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (2002). Voluntary and automatic attentional control of visual working memory. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 754–763. doi:10.3758/BF03194742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholl, B. J. (2000). Attenuated change blindness for exogenously attended items in a flicker paradigm. Visual Cognition, 7, 377–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shuman, M., & Kanwisher, N. (2004). Numerical magnitude in the human parietal lobe: Tests of representational generality and domain specificity. Neuron, 44, 557–569.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sperling, G. (1960). The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 74, 1–29. 11, Whole No. 498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanoue, R. T., & Berryhill, M. E. (2012). The mental wormhole: Internal attention shifts without regard for distance. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 1199–1215. doi:10.3758/s13414-012-0305-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theeuwes, J. (1989). Effects of location and form cuing on the allocation of attention in the visual field. Acta Psychologica, 72, 177–192. doi:10.1016/0001-6918(89)90043-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Theeuwes, J., & Van der Burg, E. (2007). The role of spatial and nonspatial information in visual selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 1335–1351. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.33.6.1335

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Treisman, A. (1988). Features and objects: The Fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A, 201–237. doi:10.1080/02724988843000104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Treue, S., & Martínez-Trujillo, J. C. (1999). Feature-based attention influences motion processing gain in macaque visual cortex. Nature, 399, 575–579. doi:10.1038/21176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, E. K., Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (2001). Storage of features, conjunctions, and objects in visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 92–114. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.27.1.92

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, M. E., & Treisman, A. M. (2002). Binding in short-term visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 48–64. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.131.1.48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodman, G. F., Vecera, S. P., & Luck, S. J. (2003). Perceptual organization influences visual working memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 80–87. doi:10.3758/BF03196470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhuang, X., & Papathomas, T. V. (2011). Cue relevance effects in conjunctive visual search: Cueing for location, color, and orientation. Journal of Vision, 11(7), 6:1–13. doi:10.1167/11.7.6

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate School of Human and Environmental Studies, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan

    Qi Li

  2. Graduate School of Human and Environmental Studies, Yoshida-nihonmatsucho, Sakyo, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan

    Jun Saiki

Authors
  1. Qi Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jun Saiki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jun Saiki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Q., Saiki, J. Different effects of color-based and location-based selection on visual working memory. Atten Percept Psychophys 77, 450–463 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-014-0775-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-014-0775-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation