Abstract
Recent evidence has suggested that perceptual processing of single stimulus features improves when participants are temporally prepared for the occurrence of the stimuli. This study was conducted to investigate whether the benefit of temporal preparation generalizes to perceptual identification of more complex stimuli, such as letters. In three experiments, participants discriminated masked letters under high- and low-temporal-preparation conditions. Visual discrimination performance in all experiments improved when the participants were temporally prepared. Therefore, the present results support the notion that perception benefits from temporal preparation not only at the feature level, but also at subsequent levels at which feature information is integrated.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bachmann, T., & Allik, J. (1976). Integration and interruption in the masking of form by form. Perception, 5, 79–97.
Bausenhart, K. M., Rolke, B., Hackley, S. A., & Ulrich, R. (2006). The locus of temporal preparation effects: Evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 536–542.
Bausenhart, K. M., Rolke, B., & Ulrich, R. (2007). Knowing when to hear aids what to hear. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 1610–1615.
Bausenhart, K. M., Rolke, B., & Ulrich, R. (in press). Temporal preparation improves temporal resolution: Evidence from constant foreperiods. Perception & Psychophysics.
Bevan, W., Hardesty, D. L., & Avant, L. L. (1965). Response latency with constant and variable interval schedules. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 20, 969–972.
Breitmeyer, B. G. (1984). Visual masking: An integrative approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.
Brunia, C. H. M., & van Boxtel, G. J. M. (2000). Motor preparation. In J. T. Cacioppo, L. G. Tassinary, & G. G. Berntson (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (2nd ed., pp. 507–532). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carrasco, M., Williams, P. E., & Yeshurun, Y. (2002). Covert attention increases spatial resolution with or without masks: Support for signal enhancement. Journal of Vision, 2, 467–479.
Cohen, A., & Ivry, R. (1989). Illusory conjunctions inside and outside the focus of attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15, 650–663.
Correa, Á., Lupiáñez, J., & Tudela, P. (2005). Attentional preparation based on temporal expectancy modulates processing at the perceptual level. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 328–334.
Correa, Á., Lupiáñez, J., Madrid, E., & Tudela, P. (2006). Temporal attention enhances early visual processing: A review and new evidence from event-related potentials. Brain Research, 1076, 116–128.
Correa, Á., Sanabria, D., Spence, C., Tudela, P., & Lupiáñez, J. (2006). Selective temporal attention enhances the temporal resolution of visual perception: Evidence from a temporal order judgment task. Brain Research, 1070, 202–205.
Coull, J. T., & Nobre, A. C. (1998). Where and when to pay attention: The neural systems for directing attention to spatial locations and to time intervals as revealed by both PET and fMRI. Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 7426–7435.
Drazin, D. H. (1961). Effects of foreperiod, foreperiod variability, and probability of stimulus occurrence on simple reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 43–50.
Frowein, H. W., & Sanders, A. F. (1978). Effects of visual stimulus degradation, S—R compatibility, and foreperiod duration on choice reaction time and movement time. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 12, 106–108.
Grondin, S., & Rammsayer, T. (2003). Variable foreperiods and temporal discrimination. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56A, 731–765.
Grosjean, M., Rosenbaum, D. A., & Elsinger, C. (2001). Timing and reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 256–272.
Hackley, S. A., Schankin, A., Wohlschläger, A., & Wascher, E. (2007). Localization of temporal preparation effects via trisected reaction time. Psychophysiology, 44, 334–338.
Hackley, S. A., & Valle-Inclán, F. (1998). Automatic alerting does not speed up late motoric processes in a reaction-time task. Nature, 391, 786–788.
Hackley, S. A., & Valle-Inclán, F. (1999). Accessory stimulus effects on response selection: Does arousal speed decision making? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 321–329.
Hackley, S. A., & Valle-Inclán, F. (2003). Which stages of processing are speeded by a warning signal? Biological Psychology, 64, 27–45.
Hasbroucq, T., Kaneko, H., Akamatsu, M., & Possamaï, C.-A. (1999). The time-course of preparatory spinal and cortico-spinal inhibition: An H-reflex and transcranial magnetic stimulation study in man. Experimental Brain Research, 124, 33–41.
Hawkins, H. L., Shafto, M. G., & Richardson, K. (1988). Effects of target luminance and cue validity on the latency of visual detection. Perception & Psychophysics, 44, 484–492.
Howarth, C. I., & Treisman, M. (1961). Lowering of an auditory threshold by a near threshold warning signal. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 13, 12–18.
Kahneman, D. (1968). Method, findings, and theory in studies of visual masking. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 404–425.
Klein, R., & Kerr, B. (1974). Visual signal detection and the locus of foreperiod effects. Memory & Cognition, 2, 431–435.
Klemmer, E. T. (1956). Time uncertainty in simple reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51, 179–184.
Lange, K., Rösler, F., & Röder, B. (2003). Early processing stages are modulated when auditory stimuli are presented at an attended moment in time: An event-related potential study. Psychophysiology, 40, 806–817.
Loftus, G. R. (2002). Analysis, interpretation, and visual presentation of experimental data. In H. Pashler (Ed.), Stevens' handbook of experimental psychology: Vol. 4. Methodology in experimental psychology (3rd ed., pp. 339–390). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Los, S. A., Knol, D. L., & Boers, R. M. (2001). The foreperiod effect revisited: Conditioning as a basis for nonspecific preparation. Acta Psychologica, 106, 121–145.
Los, S. A., & Van Den Heuvel, C. E. (2001). Intentional and unintentional contributions to nonspecific preparation during reaction time foreperiods. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27, 370–386.
Loveless, N. E. (1973). The contingent negative variation related to preparatory set in a reaction time situation with variable foreperiod, Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 35, 369–374.
Loveless, N. E. (1975). The effect of warning interval on signal detection and event-related slow potentials of the brain. Perception & Psychophysics, 17, 565–570.
Lowe, G. (1967). Interval of time uncertainty in visual detection. Perception & Psychophysics, 2, 278–280.
Marr, D. (1982). Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. San Francisco: Freeman.
Mattes, S., & Ulrich, R. (1997). Response force is sensitive to the temporal uncertainty of response stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 1089–1097.
Miller, J., & Reynolds, A. (2003). The locus of redundant-targets and nontargets effects: Evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm. Journal for Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 1126–1142.
Mo, S. S., & George, E. J. (1977). Foreperiod effect on time estimation and simple reaction time. Acta Psychologica, 41, 47–59.
Müller-Gethmann, H., Ulrich, R., & Rinkenauer, G. (2003). Locus of the effect of temporal preparation: Evidence from the lateralized readiness potential. Psychophysiology, 40, 597–611.
Niemi, P. (1979). Stimulus intensity effects on auditory and visual reaction processes. Acta Psychologica, 43, 299–312.
Niemi, P., & Lehtonen, E. (1982). Foreperiod and visual stimulus intensity: A reappraisal. Acta Psychologica, 50, 73–82.
Niemi, P., & Näätänen, R. (1981). Foreperiod and simple reaction time. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 133–162.
Pashler, H., & Johnston, J. C. (1989). Chronometric evidence for central postponement in temporally overlapping tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41A, 19–45.
Pashler, H., & Johnston, J. C. (1998). Attentional limitations in dualtask performance. In H. Pashler (Ed.), Attention (pp. 155–189). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R., & Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 160–174.
Prinzmetal, W., Presti, D. E., & Posner, M. I. (1986). Does attention affect visual feature integration? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 12, 361–369.
Purcell, D. G., Stewart, A. L., & Stanovich, K. E. (1983). Another look at semantic priming without awareness. Perception & Psychophysics, 34, 65–71.
Raab, D., Fehrer, E., & Hershenson, M. (1961). Visual reaction time and the Broca—Sulzer phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 193–199.
Rodway, P. (2005). The modality shift effect and the effectiveness of warning signals in different modalities. Acta Psychologica, 120, 199–226.
Rolke, B., & Hofmann, P. (2007). Temporal uncertainty degrades perceptual processing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 522–526.
Sanders, A. F. (1980a). Some effects of instructed muscle tension on choice reaction time and movement time. In R. S. Nickerson (Ed.), Attention and performance VIII (pp. 59–74). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Sanders, A. F. (1980b). Stage analysis of reaction processes. In G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor behavior (pp. 331–354). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Sanders, A. F. (1998). Elements of human performance: Reaction processes and attention in human skill. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Sanders, A. F., & Wertheim, A. H. (1973). The relation between physical stimulus properties and the effect of foreperiod duration on reaction time. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25, 201–206.
Simon, J. R., & Slaviero, D. P. (1975). Differential effects of a foreperiod countdown procedure on simple and choice reaction time. Journal of Motor Behavior, 7, 9–14.
Smith, P. L., & Wolfgang, B. J. (2004). The attentional dynamics of masked detection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 30, 119–136.
Smulders, F. T. Y. (1993). The selectivity of age effects on information processing: Response times and electrophysiology. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Sperling, G. (1963). A model for visual memory tasks. Human Factors, 5, 19–31.
Spijkers, W. A. (1990). The relation between response-specificity, S—R compatibility, foreperiod duration and muscle-tension in a target aiming task. Acta Psychologica, 75, 261–277.
Sternberg, S. (2001). Separate modifiability, mental modules, and the use of pure and composite measures to reveal them. Acta Psychologica, 106, 147–246.
Tandonnet, C., Burle, B., Vidal, F., & Hasbroucq, T. (2003). The influence of time preparation on motor processes assessed by surface Laplacian estimation. Clinical Neurophysiology, 114, 2376–2384.
Tandonnet, C., Burle, B., Vidal, F., & Hasbroucq, T. (2006). Knowing when to respond and the efficiency of the cortical motor command: A Laplacian ERP study. Brain Research, 1109, 158–163.
Teichner, W. H. (1954). Recent studies of simple reaction time. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 128–149.
Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136.
Treisman, M., & Howarth, C. I. (1959). Changes in threshold level produced by a signal preceding or following the threshold stimulus. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 11, 129–142.
Turvey, M. T. (1973). On peripheral and central processes in vision: Inferences from an information-processing analysis of masking with pattern stimuli. Psychological Review, 80, 1–52.
Van der Lubbe, R. H. J., Los, S. A., Jaśkowski, P., & Verleger, R. (2004). Being prepared on time: On the importance of the previ ous foreperiod to current preparation, as reflected in speed, force and preparation- related brain potentials. Acta Psychologica, 116, 245–262.
Woodrow, H. (1914). The effect upon reaction time of variation in the preparatory interval. In J. Angell, H. Warren, J. Watson, & S. Franz (Eds.), The psychological monographs (pp. 16–65). Princeton, NJ: Psychological Review Co.
Yeshurun, Y. (2004). Isoluminant stimuli and red background attenuate the effects of transient spatial attention on temporal resolution. Vision Research, 44, 1375–1387.
Yeshurun, Y., & Carrasco, M. (1999). Spatial attention improves performance in spatial resolution tasks. Vision Research, 39, 293–306.
Yeshurun, Y., & Levy, L. (2003). Transient spatial attention degrades temporal resolution. Psychological Science, 14, 225–231.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This study was supported by Grant RO 3034/2-1 from the German Research Foundation (DFG).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rolke, B. Temporal preparation facilitates perceptual identification of letters. Perception & Psychophysics 70, 1305–1313 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/PP.70.7.1305
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/PP.70.7.1305