Skip to main content
Log in

First possession: An assumption guiding inferences about who owns what

  • Brief Reports
  • Published:
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

How do we determine who owns what? This article reports evidence indicating that we typically assume that the first person who possesses an object is its owner. In Experiments 1 and 2, participants read cartoons in which two children each take a turn playing with a toy. Participants selected the character who first possessed the toy when judging who owned it, but not when judging which character liked it more. In Experiment 3, participants read stories based on the Pierson v. Post (1805) property law case. In line with the appellate court’s ruling in that case, participants selected the character who first captured and possessed an animal as its owner over another character who had pursued it earlier. Together, these findings provide evidence for an assumption that specifically guides our reasoning about ownership and that may lead everyday intuitions about property to be generally consistent with property law.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Beggan, J. K. (1992). On the social nature of nonsocial perception: The mere ownership effect. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 62, 229–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beggan, J. K., & Brown, E. M. (1994). Association as a psychological justification for ownership. Journal of Psychology, 128, 365–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumenthal, J. A. (2002, March). Lay perceptions of property and nuisance: Do intuitions match legal doctrine? Poster session presented at the American Psychology-Law Society Conference, Austin, TX.

  • Darley, J. M. (2001). Citizens’ sense of justice and the legal system. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 10–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dittmar, H. (1992). The social psychology of material possessions: To have is to be. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dukeminier, J., Krier, J. E., Alexander, G. S., & Schill, M. H. (2006). Property (6th ed). New York: Aspen Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, O., & Neary, K. R. (in press). Determining who owns what: Do children infer ownership from first possession? Cognition.

  • Hook, J. (1993). Judgments about the right to property from preschool to adulthood. Law & Human Behavior, 17, 135–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lueck, D. (1995). The rule of first possession and the design of law. Journal of Law & Economics, 38, 393–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, C. L. (1987). Qualitative differences among gender-stereotyped toys: Implications for cognitive and social development in girls and boys. Sex Roles, 16, 473–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. T. (2003). The state of psychological ownership: Integrating and extending a century of research. Review of General Psychology, 7, 84–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierson v. Post, 3 Cal. R. 175, 2 Am. Dec. 264 (N.Y., 1805)

  • Shotland, R. L., & Hyers, L. (2000). Evidence for the common law as a hypothesis-generating tool for conflict resolution: What is fair? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 2534–2557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snare, F. (1972). The concept of property. American Philosophical Quarterly, 9, 200–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake, J. E. (2004). The property“instinct.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 359, 1763–1774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, R. (1980). Towards a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1, 39–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ori Friedman.

Additional information

The cartoons in Experiments 1 and 2 were created with South Park Studio (www.sp-studio.de). This research was supported by a University of Waterloo/SSHRC Seed Grant, and by NSERC Grant RGPIN327362-06.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Friedman, O. First possession: An assumption guiding inferences about who owns what. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 15, 290–295 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.2.290

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.2.290

Keywords

Navigation