Abstract
The impact of a working-memory load on analogical mapping was examined in two experiments, using a dual-task paradigm. In Experiment 1, we used a phonological working-memory load; in Experiment 2, we used a phonological working-memory load and an executive working-memory load. The subjects were required to identify correspondences between visual scenes, either for single objects or for three objects simultaneously. The results indicated that the imposition of either a phonological or an executive working-memory load decreased the frequency with which the subjects identified correspondences between scenes based on relations and increased the frequency with which they identified correspondences based on object attributes. The frequency with which subjects made relational mappings was increased by the instruction to find correspondences for multiple objects in a scene simultaneously, rather than for just one. These results indicate that mapping on the basis of relations places greater demands on both modality-specific buffers and executive components of working memory than does mapping on the basis of object attributes.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baddeley, A. D. (1986).Working memory. Oxford University Press,
Baddeley, A. D. (1992). Working memory.Science,255, 556–559.
Dunbar, K., &Sussman, D. (1995). Toward a cognitive account of frontal lobe function: Simulating frontal lobe deficits in normal subjects. In J. Grafman, K. J. Holyoak, & F. Boller (Eds.),Structure and functions of the human prefrontal cortex (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 769, pp. 289–304). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy.Cognitive Science,7, 155–170.
Gentner, D., Rattermann, M. J., Markman, A., &Kotovsky, L. (1995). Two forces in the development of relational similarity. In T. J. Simon & G. S. Halford (Eds.),Developing cognitive competence: New approaches to process modeling (pp. 263–313). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gentner, D., &Toupin, C. (1986). Systematicity and surface similarity in the development of analogy.Cognitive Science,10, 277–300.
Gilhooly, K. J., Logie, R. H., Wetherick, N. E., &Wynn, V. (1993). Working memory and strategies in syllogistic-reasoning tasks.Memory & Cognition,21, 115–124.
Goldstone, R. L., Medin, D. L., &Gentner, D. (1991). Relational similarity and the nonindependence of features in similarity judgments.Cognitive Psychology,23, 222–262.
Halford, G. S. (1993).Children’s understanding: The development of mental models. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Halford, G. S., Bain, J. D., &Maybery, M. T. (1984). Does a concurrent memory load interfere with reasoning?Current Psychological Research & Reviews,3, 14–23.
Halford, G. S., &Wilson, W. H. (1980). A category theory approach to cognitive development.Cognitive Psychology,12, 356–411.
Halford, G. S., Wilson, W. H., Guo, J., Gayler, R. W., Wiles, J., &Stewart, J. E. M. (1994). Connectionist implications for processing capacity limitations in analogies. In K. J. Holyoak & J. A. Barnden (Eds.),Advances in connectionist and neural computation theory: Vol. 2. Analogical connections (pp. 363–415). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Halford, G. S., Wilson, W. H., &Phillips, S. (1998). Processing capacity defined by relational complexity: Implications for comparative, developmental, and cognitive psychology.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,21, 803–864.
Hummel, J. E., &Holyoak, K. J. (1997) Distributed representations of structure: A theory of analogical access and mapping.Psychological Review,104, 427–466.
Klauer, K. C., Stegmaier, R., &Meiser, T. (1997). Working memory involvement in propositional and spatial reasoning.Thinking & Reasoning,3, 9–48.
Markman, A. B., &Gentner, D. (1993). Structural alignment during similarity comparisons.Cognitive Psychology,23, 431–467.
Maybery, M. T., Bain, J. D., &Halford, G. S. (1986). Informationprocessing demands of transitive inference.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,12, 600–613.
Medin, D., Goldstone, R., &Gentner, D. (1993). Respects for similarity.Psychological Review,100, 254–278.
Premack, D. (1983). The codes of man and beasts.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,6, 125–167.
Rattermann, M. J., &Gentner, D. (1998). The effects of language on similarity: The use of relational labels improves young children’s performance in a mapping task. In K. J. Holyoak, D. Gentner, & B. N. Kokinov (Eds.),Advances in analogy research: Integration of theory and data from the cognitive, computational, and neural sciences (pp. 274–282). Sofia, Bulgaria: New Bulgarian University.
Ross, B. H. (1987). This is like that: The use of earlier problems and the separation of similarity effects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 629–639.
Ross, B. H. (1989). Distinguishing types of superficial similarities: Different effects on the access and use of earlier problems.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 456–468.
Smith, L. B. (1989). From global similarities to kinds of similarities: The construction of dimensions in development. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.),Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 146–178). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Thompson, R. K. R., Oden, D. L., &Boysen, S. T. (1997). Languagenaive chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) judge relations between relations in a conceptual matching-to-sample task.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,23, 31–43.
Tohill, J. M., &Holyoak, K. J. (2000). The impact of anxiety on analogical reasoning.Thinking & Reasoning,6, 27–40.
Toms, M., Morris, N., &Ward, D. (1993). Working memory and conditional reasoning.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,46A, 469–699.
Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity.Psychological Review,84, 327–352.
Waltz, J. A., Knowlton, B. J., Holyoak, K. J., Boone, K. B., Mishkin, F. S., de Menezes Santos, M., Thomas, C. R., &Miller, B. L. (1999). A system for relational reasoning in human prefrontal cortex.Psychological Science,10, 119–125.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by NSF Grant SBR-9729023. Experiment 1 was reported at the Twenty-first Anual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (Vancouver, August 1999).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Waltz, J.A., Lau, A., Grewal, S.K. et al. The role of working memory in analogical mapping. Memory & Cognition 28, 1205–1212 (2000). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211821
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211821