Abstract
Bacon and Egeth (1994) have claimed that color singletons do not interfere with search for a shape singleton when, instead of using asingleton detection mode, participants are forced to use afeature search mode. Bacon and Egeth induced a feature search mode by adding different shape singletons to the display so that observers could not simply respond touniqueness to find the target. We did exactly the same but used larger display sizes to ensure that the target and distractor singletons remained salient. The results show that under these conditions, an irrelevant color singleton interferes with search for a shape singleton. It is argued that the notion of differential search modes may be incorrect and that the results can be explained in terms of bottom-up salience signals.
Article PDF
References
Bacon, W. F., &Egeth, H. E. (1994). Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture.Perception & Psychophysics,55, 485–496.
Duncan, J., &Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity.Psychological Review,96, 433–458.
Egeth, H. E., &Yantis, S. (1997). Visual attention: Control, representation and time course.Annual Review of Psychology,48, 269–297.
Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., &Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 1030–1044.
Gibson, B. S., &Peterson, M. A. (2001). In attentional blindness and attentional capture: Evidence for attention-based theories of visual salience. In C. L. Folk & B. S. Gibson (Eds.),Attraction, distraction and action: Multiple perspectives on attentional capture (pp. 51–76). New York: Elsevier.
Green, M. (1991) Visual search, visual streams, and visual architectures.Perception & Psychophysics,50, 388–403.
Itti, L., &Koch, C. (2000). Saliency based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention.Vision Research,40, 1489–1506.
Jonides, J., &Yantis, S. (1988). Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention.Perception & Psychophysics,43, 346–354.
Kim, M. S., &Cave, K. R. (1999). Top-down and bottom-up attentional control: On the nature of interference from a salient distractor.Perception & Psychophysics,61, 1009–1023.
Nakayama, K., &Joseph, J. S. (1998). Attention, pattern recognition and popout in visual search. In R. Parasuraman (Ed.),The attentive brain (pp. 279–298). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Nothdurft, H. C. (1993). Saliency effects across dimensions in visual search.Vision Research,33, 839–844.
Ruz, M., &Lupiáñez, J. (2002). Attentional capture and exogenous orienting: Upon their automaticity and sensitivity to endogenous control.Psicológica,23, 283–309.
Theeuwes, J. (1990). Perceptual selectivity is task dependent: Evidence from selective search.Acta Psychologica,74, 81–99.
Theeuwes, J. (1991a). Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity.Perception & Psychophysics,50, 184–193.
Theeuwes, J. (1991b). Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: The effect of visual onsets and offsets.Perception & Psychophysics,49, 83–90.
Theeuwes, J. (1992). Perceptual selectivity for color and shape.Perception & Psychophysics,51, 599–606.
Theeuwes, J. (1994a). Endogenous and exogenous control of visual selection.Perception,23, 429–440.
Theeuwes, J. (1994b). Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set: Selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 799–806.
Theeuwes, J., Atchley, P., &Kramer, A. F. (2000). On the time course of top-down and bottom-up control of visual attention. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.).Attention & performance XVIII (pp. 105–124). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Theeuwes, J., &Burger, R. (1998). Attentional control during visual search: The effect of irrelevant singletons.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 1342–1353.
Theeuwes, J., &Godijn, R. (2001). Attention and oculomotor capture. In C. L. Folk & B. S. Gibson (Eds.),Attraction, distraction and action: Multiple perspectives on attentional capture (pp. 121–149). New York: Elsevier.
Theeuwes, J., &Godijn, R. (2002). Irrelevant singletons capture attention: Evidence from inhibition of return.Perception & Psychophysics,64, 764–770.
Treisman, A. M., &Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention.Cognitive Psychology,12, 97–136.
Yantis, S. (1996). Attentional capture in vision. In A. F. Kramer, M. G. H. Coles, & G. D. Logan (Eds.),Converging operations in the study of visual attention (pp. 45–76). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Yantis, S. (2000). Goal directed and stimulus driven determinants of attentional control. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.),Attention & performance XVIII (pp. 73–104). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Yantis, S., &Jonides, J. (1990). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Voluntary versus automatic allocation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 121–134.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Theeuwes, J. Top-down search strategies cannot override attentional capture. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 11, 65–70 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206462
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206462