Abstract
We examine the form of distributions of simple reaction time. The stimuli we use are the offset of weak pure tones masked by wide-band noise. The hazard functions of the RT distributions (i.e, the probability of a response given that one has not already occurred) are monotone increasing for very weak tones but become peaked for stronger tones. Of the models available in the literature, none is very satisfactory, although two can account for the general qualitative shape of the peaked hazard functions. We propose a model wherein both a change and a level detector function in parallel. If one assumes that the change detector and level detector have slightly different thresholds, this model can account for both the monotone increasing and the peaked hazard functions.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Reference Note
Shannon, R. V. Unpublished data, 1973. Examples of these data appear in Burbeck (1979).
References
Ahumada, A, Jr.,Marken, R., &Sandusky, A. Time and frequency analysis of auditory signal detection.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1975,57, 385–390.
Barlow, R. E., &Proschan, F.Mathematical theory of reliability. New York: Wiley, 1965.
Burbeck, S. L.Change and level detectors inferred from simple reaction time. Doctoral dissertation, University of California at Irvine, 1979.
Bush, R. R., &Mosteller, F.Stochastic models for learning. New York: Wiley, 1955.
Carteretie, E. C, Friedman, M. P., &Cosmides, R. Reaction-time distributions in the detection of weak signals in noise.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1965,38, 531–542.
Christie, L. S. The measurement of discriminative behavior.Psychological Review, 1952,59, 443–452.
Christie, L. S., &Luce, R. D. Decision structure and time relations in simple choice behavior.Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 1956,18, 89–112.
Cleland, B. G, Dubin, M. W., &Levick, W. R. Sustained and transient cells in the cat’s retina and lateral geniculate nucleus.Journal of Physiology (London), 1971,217, 473–496.
Davis, K. B. Mean square error properties of density estimates.The Annals of Statistics, 1975,3, 1025–1030.
Davis, K. B. Mean integrated square error properties of density estimates.The Annals of Statistics, 1977,5, 530–535.
Donders, F. C. [On the speed of mental processes.] In W. G. Koster (Ed. and trans.),Attention and performance II. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1969. (Reprinted fromActa Psychologica, 1969,30.) (Originally published 1868.)
Emerson, P. L. Simple reaction time with markovian evolution of gaussian discriminal processes.Psychometrika, 1970,35, 99–109.
Enroth-Cugell, C., &Robson, J. G. The contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells of the cat.Journal of Physiology (London), 1966,187, 517–552.
Gerstein, G. L, Butler, R. A., &Erulkar, S. D. Excitation and inhibition in cochlear nucleus. I. Tone-burst stimulation.Journal of Neurophysiology, 1968,31, 526–536.
Gnedenko, B. V, Belyayev, Yu. K., &Soloyev, A. D.Mathematical methods of reliability theory. (Translated by Scripta Technica; translation edited by Richard E. Barlow) New York: Academic Press, 1969.
Green, D. M. Fourier analysis of reaction time data.Behavior Research Methods & Instruments, 1971,3, 121–125.
Green, D. M., &Luce, R. D. Detection of auditory signals presented at random times: III.Perception & Psychophysics, 1971,9, 257–268.
Green, D. M., &Luce, R. D. Speed-accuracy trade off in auditory detection. In S. Kornblum (Ed.),Attention and performance IV. New York: Academic Press, 1973.
Grice, G. R. Stimulus intensity and response evocation.Psychological Review, 1968,75, 359–373.
Grice, G. R. Application of a variable criterion model to auditory reaction time as a function of the type of catch trial.Perception & Psychophysics, 1972,12, 103–107.
Hohle, R. H. Inferred components of reaction times as functions of foreperiod duration.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1965,69, 382–386.
Hopkins, G. W., &Kristofferson, A. B. Ultrastable stimulus-response latencies: Acquisition and stimulus control.Perception & Psychophysics, 1980,27, 241–250.
Johnson, N. L., &Kotz, S.Continuous univariate distributions (2 vols.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1970.
Kiang, N. Y. S, Watanabe, T, Thomas, E. C., &Clark, L. F.Discharge patterns of single fibers in the cat’s auditory nerve. Cambridge, Mass: M.I.T. Press, 1965.
Laming, D. R. J.Information theory of choice reaction times. London and New York: Academic Press, 1968.
Link, S. W. The relative judgment theory of two choice reaction times.Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1975,12, 114–135.
Luce, R. D. Response latencies and probabilities. In K. A. Arrow, S. Karlin, & P. Suppes (Eds.),Mathematical methods in the social sciences, 1959. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1960.
Luce, R. D., &Green, D. M. Detection of auditory signals presented at random times, II.Perception & Psychophysics, 1970,7, 1–14.
Luce, R. D., &Green, D. M. A neural timing theory for response times and the psychophysics of intensity.Psychological Review, 1972,79, 14–57.
Macmillan, N. A. Detection and recognition of increments and decrements in auditory intensity.Perception & Psychophysics, 1971,10, 233–238.
Macmillan, N. A. Detection and recognition of intensity changes in tone and noise: The detection-recognition disparity.Perception & Psychophysics, 1973,13, 65–75.
Marrocco, R. T. Sustained and transient cells in monkey lateral geniculate nucleus: Conduction velocities and response properties.Journal of Neurophysiology, 1976,39, 340–353.
McGill, W. J. Stochastic latency mechanisms. In R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush, & E. Galanter (Eds.),Handbook of mathematical psychology. New York: Wiley, 1963.
McGill, W. J., &Gibbon, J. The general-gamma distribution and reaction times.Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1965,2, 1–18.
Miller, D. R. & Singpurwalla, N. D.Failure rate estimation using random smoothing. National Technical Information Service No. AD-A040999/5ST, 1977.
Miller, G. A. The perception of short bursts of noise.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1948,20, 160–170.
Møller, A. R. Unit responses in the cochlear nucleus of the rat to pure tones.Acta Psychologica Scandinavica, 1969,75, 530–541.
Nickerson, R. S. Expectancy, waiting time and the psychological refractory period.Acta Psychologica, 1967,27, 23–34.
Patel, R. C. Estimates of parameters of truncated inverse Gaussian distribution.Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Tokyo, 1965,17, 29–33.
Pfeiffer, R. R. Classification of response patterns of spike discharges for units in the cochlear nucleus: Tone burst stimulation.Experimental Brain Research, 1966,1, 220–235.
Ratcliff, R. A theory of memory retrieval.Psychological Review, 1978,85, 59–108.
Ratcliff, R., &Murdock, B. B, Jr. Retrieval processes in recognition memory.Psychological Review, 1976,83, 190–214.
Restle, F.Psychology of judgment and choice. New York: Wiley, 1961.
Rice, J., &Rosenblatt, M. Estimators of the log survivor function and hazard function.Sankhya: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Series A, 1976,38, 60–78.
Rose, J. E, Brugge, J. F, Anderson, D. J., &Hind, J. E. Phase locked response to low-frequencytones in single auditory nerve fibers of the squirrel monkey.Journal of Neurophysiology, 1967,30, 769–793.
Small, A. M. Periodicity pitch. In J. V. Tobias (Ed.),Foundations of modern auditory theory (Vol. 1). NewYork: Academic Press, 1970.
Snodgrass, J. G. Foreperiod effects in simple reaction time: Anticipation or expectancy?Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph, 1969,79, 1–19.
Snodgrass, J. G, Luce, R. D., &Galanter, E. Some experiments on simple and choice reaction time.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1967,75, 1–17.
Stone, M. Models for choice-reaction time.Psychometrika, 1960,25, 251–260.
Thomas, E. A. C. Alternative models for information processing: Constructing non-parametric tests.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1969,22, Part 2, 105–113.
Thomas, E. A. C. Sufficient conditions for monotone hazard rate: An application to latency-probability curves.Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1971,8, 33–332.
Tolhurst, D. J. Reaction times in the detection of gratings by human observers: A probabilistic mechanism.Vision Research, 1975,15, 1143–1149.
Tweedie, M. C. K. Statistical properties of inverse Gaussian distribution, I.Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1957,28, 362–377.
Wald, A.Sequential analysis. New York: Wiley, 1947.
Wandell, B., &Luce, R. D. Pooling peripheral information: Average versus extreme values.Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1978,17, 220–235.
Watson, G. S., &Leadbetter, M. R. Hazard analysis I.Biometrika, 1964,51, 175–184. (a)
Watson, G. S., &Leadbetter, M. R. Hazard analysis II.Sankhya, Series A, 1964,26, 101–116. (b)
Woodworth, R. S., &Schlosberg, H.Experimental psychology (rev. ed.). New York: Holt, 1954.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The research reported here is part of S. L. Burbeck’s PhD dissertation, University of California at Irvine. The data were collected at the Psychophysical Laboratory, Harvard University. It was supported in part by grants from the National Science Foundation to the University of California at Irvine and to Harvard University, R. D. Luce, principal investigator.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Burbeck, S.L., Luce, R.D. Evidence from auditory simple reaction times for both change and level detectors. Perception & Psychophysics 32, 117–133 (1982). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204271
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204271