Abstract
This paper deals with the order in which different levels of form are recognized in a visual image. An experiment is reported in which the size of a tachistoscopically viewed image was varied. The results suggest neither an invariant “top-down” (gross shapes first followed by lower-order details) or “bottom-up” (the opposite) sequence. Rather, they seem to suggest a sort of “middle-out” sequence: forms at some intermediate level of structure having an optimal size or spatial-frequency spectrum are processed first, with subsequent processing of both higher and lower levels of form.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Breitmeyer, B. G. Simple reaction time as a measure of the temporal response properties of transient and sustained channels.Vision Research, 1975,15, 1411–1412.
Broadbent, D. E. The hidden preattentive processes.American Psychologist, 1977,32, 109–118.
Eriksen, C. W., &Hoffman, J. E. Selective attention: Noise suppression or signal enhancement?Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1974,4, 587–589.
Fu, K. S.Syntactic methods in pattern recognition. New York: Academic Press, 1974.
Ginsburg, A. The perception of visual form: A two-dimensional filter analysis. In V. D. Gleger (Ed.),Proceedings of the Fourth Symposium on Sensory System Physiology (Information Processing in the Visual System). Leningrad: Russian Academy of Sciences, 1976.
Halle, M., &Stevens, K. Speech recognition: A model and a program of research.IRD Transactions on Information Theory, 1962,IT-8, 155–159.
Kahneman, D.Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall, 1973.
Kinchla, R. A. Detecting target elements in multi-element arrays: A confusability model.Perception & Psychophysics, 1974,15, 149–158.
Kinchla, R. A. The role of structural redundancy in the perception of visual targets.Perception & Psychophysics, 1977,22, 19–30.
Lupp, U., Hauske, G., &Wolf, W. Perceptual latencies to sinusoidal gratings.Vision Research, 1976,16, 969–972.
Navon, D. Forest before the trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception.Cognitive Psychology, 1977,9, 353–383.
Neisser, U.Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century Crofts, 1967.
Palmer, S. E. Visual perception and world knowledge. In D. A. Norman & D. E. Rumelhart (Eds.),Explorations in cognition. San Francisco: Freeman, 1976.
Pomerantz, J. R., &Sager, L. C. Asymmetric integrality with dimensions of visual pattern.Perception & Psychophysics, 1975,18, 460–466.
Posner, M. I., Nissen, M. J., &Ogden, W. C. Attended and unattended processing modes: The role of set for spatial location. In H. L. Pick & I. J. Saltzman (Eds.),Modes of perceiving and processing information. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1978.
Rumelhart, D. E. A multicomponent theory of the perception of briefly exposed visual displays.Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1970,7, 191–218.
Shaw, M. L. A capacity allocation model for reaction time.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Perception and Human Performance, 1978,4, 586–598.
fnSperling, G., & Melchner, M. J. Visual search, visual attention, and the attention operating characteristic. In J. Requin (Ed.),Attention and performance VII. New York: Academic Press, in press.
Sterling, N., &Coltheart, M. Stroop interference in a letter naming task.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1977,10, 31–34.
Vurpillot, E., Ruel, J., &Castrec, A. L’organisation perceptive chez le nourrisson: Réponse au tout ou à ses éléments.Bulletin de Psychologie, 1977,30, 396–405.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kinchla, R.A., Wolfe, J.M. The order of visual processing: “Top-down,” “bottom-up,” or “middle-out”. Perception & Psychophysics 25, 225–231 (1979). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202991
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202991