Abstract
Word frequency is widely believed to affect object naming speed, despite several studies in which it has been reported that frequency effects may be redundant upon age of acquisition. We report, first, a reanalysis of data from the study by Oldfield and Wingfield (1965), which is standardly cited as evidence for a word frequency effect in object naming; then we report two new experiments. The reanalysis of Oldfield and Wingfield shows that age of acquisition is the major determinant of naming speed, and that frequency plays no independent role when its-correlation with other variables is taken into account. In Experiment 1, age of acquisition and phoneme length proved to be the primary determinants of object naming speed. Frequency, prototypicality, and imageability had no independent effect. In Experiment 2, subjects classified objects into two semantic categories (natural or man-made). Prototypicality and semantic category were the only variables to have a significant effect on reaction time, with no effect of age of acquisition, frequency, imageability, or word length. We conclude that age of acquisition, not word frequency, affects the retrieval andlor execution of object names, not the process of object recognition. The locus of this effect is discussed, along with the possibility that words learned in early childhood may be more resistant to the effects of brain injury in at least some adult aphasics than words learned somewhat later.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bartram, D. J. (1976). Levels of coding in picture-picture comparison tasks.Memory & Cognition,4, 593–602.
Brown, G. D. A., &Watson, F. L. (1987). First in, first out: Word learning age and spoken word frequency as predictors of word familiarity and word naming latency.Memory& Cognition,15, 208–216.
Bub, D., & Gum, T. (1990).Psychlab (Version 0.85) [Computer program]. (available from D. Bub, 3815 Oxford Ave. Montreal, PQ H4A 2Y3, Canada)
Carroll, J. B., &White, M. N. (1973a). Age of acquisition norms for 220 pictureable nouns.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,12, 563–576.
Carroll, J. B., &White, M. N. (1973b). Word frequency and age of-acquisition as determiners of picture-naming latency.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,25, 85–95.
Cohen, J., &Cohen, P. (1975).Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ellis, A. W., Miller, D., &Sin, G. (1983). Wernicke's aphasia and normal language processing: A case study in cognitive neuropsychology.Cognition,15, 111–144.
Ellis, A. W., &Young, A. W. (1988).Human cognitive neuropsychology. Hove, U.K.: Erlbaum.
Farah, M. J. (1990).Visual agnosia: Disorders of vision and what they tell us about normal object recognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.
Feyereisen, P., van der Borght, F., &Seron, X. (1988). The operativity effect in naming: A reanalysis.Neuropsychologia,26, 401–415.
Gilhooly, K. J., &Gilhooly, M. L. (1979). Age-of-acquisition effects in lexical and episodic memory tasks.Memory & Cognition,7, 214–223.
Gilhooly, K. J., &Gilhooly, M. L. (1980). The validity of age of acquisition ratings.British Journal of Psychology,71, 105–110.
Gilhooly, K. J., &Logie, R. H. (1980). Age-of-acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity, and ambiguity measures for 1,944 words.Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation,12, 395–427.
Gilhooly, K. J., &Logie, R. H. (1981). Word age-of-acquisition, reading latencies and auditory recognition.Current Psychological Research,1, 251–262.
Gilhooly, K. J., &Watson, F. L. (1981). Word age-of-acquisition effects: A review.Current Psychological Research,1, 269–286.
Hampton, J. A., &Gardiner, M. M. (1983). Measures of internal category structure: A correlational analysis of normative data.British Journal of Psychology,74, 491–516.
Hirsh, K. W. (1992). Age of acquisition and naming.Proceedings of the Bonn conference on the evaluation of the efficacy of technology in the assessment and rehabilitation of brain-damagedpatients. Bonn.
Howard, D., Patterson, K. E., Franklin, S., Orchard-Lisle, V. M., &Morton, J. (1984). Variability and consistency in picture naming by aphasic patients. In F. C. Rose (Ed.),Advances in neurology: Vol. 42. Progress in aphasiology (pp. 263–276). New York: Raven Press.
Howell, D. (1982).Statistical,nethods for psychology. Boston: Duxbury Press.
Howes, D. (1967). Some experimental investigations of language in aphasia. In K. Saltzinger & S. Saltzinger (Eds.),Research in verbal behaviour and some neurophysiological implications (pp. 189–196). New York: Academic Press.
Humphreys, G. W., &Riddoch, M. J. (1987). Picture naming. In G. W. Humphreys & M. J. Riddoch (Eds.),Visual object processing: A cognitive neuropsychological approach (pp. 107–143). London: Eribaum.
Humphreys, G. W., Riddoch, M. J., &Quinlan, P. T. (1988). Cascade processes in picture identification.Cognitive Neuropsychology,5, 67–103.
Huttenlocher, J., &Kubicek, L. F. (1983). The source of relatedness effects on naming latency.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,9, 486–496.
Johansson, S., &Hofland, K. (1989).Frequency analysis of English vocabulary and grammar (Vol. 1). Oxford: Oxford University Press/Clarendon Press.
Kay, J., &Ellis, A. W. (1987). A cognitive neuropsychological case study of anomia.Brain,110, 613–629.
Kelly, M. H. (1986).On the selection of linguistic options. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Cornell University.
Kučera, H., &Francis, W. (1967).Computational analysis of presentday American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
Lachman, R. (1973). Uncertainty effects on time to access the internal lexicon.Journal of Experimental Psychology,99, 199–208.
Lachman, R., Shaffer, J. P., &Hennrikus, D. (1974). Language and cognition: Effects of Stimulus codabiity, name-word frequency, and age of acquisition on lexical RT.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,13, 613–625.
Lofrus, E. F., &Suppes, P. (1972). Structural variables that determine the speed of retrieving wordsfrom long-term memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,11, 770–777.
Lupker, S. J. (1985). Context effects in word and picture recognition: A re-evaluation of structural models. In A.W. Ellis (Ed.),Progress in thepsychology of language (Vol. 1, pp. 109–142). London: Erlbaum.
McClelland, J. L., &Rumelhart, D. E. (1985). Distributed memory and the representation of general and specific information.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,114, 159–188.
McRae, K., Jared, D., &Seidenberg, M. S. (1990). On the roles of frequency and lexical access in word naming.Journal of Memory & Language,29, 43–65.
Miceli, G., Giustolisi, L., &Caramazza, A. (1991). The interaction of lexical and non-lexical processing mechanisms: Evidence from aphasia.Cortex,27, 57–80.
Monsell, S. (1991). The nature and locus of word frequency effects in reading, In D. Besner & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.),Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 148–197). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Monsell, S., Doyle, M. C., &Haggard, P. N. (1989). Effects of frequency on visual word recognition tasks: Where are they?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,118, 43–71.
Morton, J. (1969). Interaction of information in word recognition.Psychological Review,76, 165–178.
Morton, J., &Patterson, K. E. (1980). A new attempt at an interpretation, or, an attempt at a new interpretation. In M. Coltheart, K. E. Patterson, & J. C. Marshall (Eds.),Deep dyslexia (pp. 91–118). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Oldfield, R. C., &Wingfield, A. (1965). Response latencies in naming objects.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,4, 272–281.
Quinlan, P. T. (1992).The MRC psycholinguistic database. London: Oxford University Press.
Riddoch, M. J., &Humphreys, G. W. (1987). Object naming. In G. W. Humphreys & M. J. Riddoch (Eds.),Visual object processing:A cognitive neuropsychological approach (pp. 107–143). Hove: Erlbaum.
Rochford, G., &Williams, M. (1962). Studies in the development and breakdown of the use of names, Part I: The relation between nominal dysphasia and the acquisition of vocabulary in childhood. Part II: Experimental production of naming disorders in normal people.Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry,25, 222–233.
Rochford, G., &Williams, M. (1965). Studies in the development and breakdown of the use of names, Part IV: The effects of word frequency.Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry,28, 407–413.
Rubin, D. C. (1980). 51 properties of 125 words: A unit analysis of verbal behavior.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,19, 736–755.
Segui, J., Mehler, J., Frauenfelder, U., &Morton, J. (1982). The word frequency effect and lexical access.Neuropsychologia,2, 615–627.
Seymour, P. H. K. (1979).Human visual cognition. London: Collier-MacMillan.
Snodgrass, J. G., &Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,6, 174–215.
Spreen, O. (1968). Psycholinguistic aspects of aphasia.Journal of Speech & Hearing Research,11, 467–480.
Stemberger, J. P., &MacWhinney, B. (1986). Frequency and the lexical storage of regularly inflected words.Memory & Cognition,14, 17–26.
Theios, J., &Amrhein, P. C. (1989). Theoretical analysis of the cognitive processes of lexical and pictorial stimuli: Reading, naming, and visual and conceptual comparisons.Psychological Review,96, 5–24.
Thorndike, E. L., &Lorge, I. (1944).The teacher's word book of 30,000 words. New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.
Vitkovitch.M., &Humphreys, G. W. (1991). Perseverant responding in speeded naming of pictures: It's in the links.Journal of Erperimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 664–680.
Whaley, C. P. (1978). Word-nonword classification time.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,17, 143–154.
Wingfield, A. (1968). Effects of frequency on identification and naming of objects.American Journal of Psychology,81, 226–234.
Zingeser, L. B., &Berndt, R. S. (1988). Grammatical class and context effects in a case of pure anonlia: Implications for models of language production.Cognitive Neuropsychology,5, 473–516.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This study was conducted while Catriona Morrison was in receipt of a studentship from the Science and Engineering Research Council.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Morrison, C.M., Ellis, A.W. & Quinlan, P.T. Age of acquisition, not word frequency, affects object naming, not object recognition. Mem Cogn 20, 705–714 (1992). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202720
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202720