Abstract
Much previous research has demonstrated that visual search is typically disrupted by the presence of a unique “singleton” distractor in the search display. Here we show that attentional capture by an irrelevant color singleton during shape search critically depends on availability of working memory to the search task: When working memory is loaded in a concurrent yet unrelated verbal short-term memory task, capture increases. These findings converge with previous demonstrations that increasing working memory load results in greater distractor interference in Stroop-like tasks (de Fockert, Rees, Frith, & Lavie, 2001; Lavie, Hirst, de Fockert, & Viding, 2004), which support the hypothesis that working memory provides goal-directed control of visual selective attention allowing to minimize interference by goal-irrelevant distractors.
Article PDF
References
Bacon, W. F., &Egeth, H. E. (1994). Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture.Perception & Psychophysics,55, 485–496.
Baddeley, A. D. (1996). Exploring the central executive.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,49A, 1–28.
de Fockert, J. W., Rees, G., Frith, C. D., &Lavie, N. (2001). The role of working memory in visual selective attention.Science,291, 1803–1806.
de Fockert, J. W., Rees, G., Frith, C. D., &Lavie, N. (2004). Neural correlates of attentional capture in visual search.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,16, 751–759.
Desimone, R., &Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.Annual Review of Neuroscience,18, 193–222.
Duncan, J., &Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity.Psychological Review,96, 433–458.
Engle, R. W., Conway, A. R. A., Tuholski, S. W., &Shisler, R. J. (1995). A resource account of inhibition.Psychological Science,6, 122–125.
Kane, M. J., &Engle, R. W. (2003). Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: The contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,132, 47–70.
Lavie, N. (2000). Selective attention and cognitive control: Dissociating attentional functions through different types of load. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.),Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 175–194). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lavie, N., Hirst, A., de Fockert, J. W., &Viding, E. (2004). Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,133, 339–354.
Logan, G. D. (1978). Attention in character-classification tasks: Evidence for the automaticity of component stages.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,107, 32–63.
Theeuwes, J. (1992). Perceptual selectivity for color and form.Perception & Psychophysics,51, 599–606.
Theeuwes, J. (1996). Perceptual selectivity for color and form: On the nature of the interference effect. In A. Kramer, M. Coles, & G. Logan (Eds.),Converging operations in the study of selective visual attention (pp. 297–314). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Woodman, G. F., &Luck, S. J. (2004). Visual search is slowed when visuospatial working memory is occupied.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,11, 269–274.
Woodman, G. F., Vogel, E. K., &Luck, S. J. (2001). Visual search remains efficient when visual working memory is full.Psychological Science,12, 219–224.
Yantis, S. (2000). Control of visual attention. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.),Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 73–104). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by an MRC grant to the first author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lavie, N., De Fockert, J. The role of working memory in attentional capture. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 12, 669–674 (2005). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196756
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196756