Abstract
Time-based theories expect memory performance to decline as the delay between study and recall of an item increases. The assumption of time-based forgetting, central to many models of serial recall, underpins their key behaviors. Here we compare the predictions of time-based and event-based models by simulation and test them in two experiments using a novel manipulation of the delay between study and retrieval. Participants were trained, via corrective feedback, to recall at different speeds, thus varying total recall time from 6 to 10 sec. In the first experiment, participants used the keyboard to enter their responses but had to repeat a word (called thesuppressor) aloud during recall to prevent rehearsal. In the second experiment, articulation was again required, but recall was verbal and was paced by the number of repetitions of the suppressor in between retrieval of items. In both experiments, serial position curves for all retrieval speeds overlapped, and output time had little or no effect. Comparative evaluation of a time-based and an event-based model confirmed that these results present a particular challenge to time-based approaches. We conclude that output interference, rather than output time, is critical in serial recall.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baddeley, A. D. (1976).The psychology of memory. New York: Basic Books.
Baddeley, A. D. (1986).Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.
Baddeley, A. D., Chincotta, D., Stafford, L., &Turk, D. (2002). Is the word length effect in STM entirely attributable to output delay? Evidence from serial recognition.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,55A, 353–369.
Baddeley, A. D., &Hitch, G. (1993). The recency effect: Implicit learning with explicit retrieval?Memory & Cognition,21, 146–155.
Baddeley, A. D., Thomson, N., &Buchanan, M. (1975). Word length and the structure of short-term memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,14, 575–589.
Beaman, C. P. (2002). Inverting the modality effect in serial recall.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,55A, 371–389.
Beaman, C. P., &Morton, J. (2000). The separate but related origins of the recency effect and the modality effect in free recall.Cognition,77, B59-B65.
Bjork, R. A., &Whitten, W. B. (1974). Recency-sensitive retrieval processes in long-term free recall.Cognitive Psychology,6, 173–189.
Borowiak, D. S. (1989). Model discrimination for nonlinear regression models. New York: Marcel Dekker.
Brown, G. D. A., &Chater, N. (2001). The chronological organization of memory: Common psychological foundations for remembering and timing. In C. Hoerl & T. McCormack (Eds.),Time and memory: Issues in philosophy and psychology (pp. 77–110). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brown, G. D. A., &Hulme, C. (1995). Modeling item length effects in memory span: No rehearsal needed?Journal of Memory & Language,34, 594–621.
Brown, G. D. A., Neath, I., & Chater, N. (2002).SIMPLE: A local distinctiveness model of scale-invariant memory and perceptual identification. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Brown, G. D. A., Preece, T., &Hulme, C. (2000). Oscillator-based memory for serial order.Psychological Review,107, 127–181.
Brown, G. D. A., Vousden, J. I., McCormack, T., &Hulme, C. (1999). The development of memory for serial order: A temporal-contextual distinctiveness model.International Journal of Psychology,34, 389–402.
Burgess, N., &Hitch, G. J. (1999). Memory for serial order: A network model of the phonological loop and its timing.Psychological Review,106, 551–581.
Caplan, D., Rochon, E., &Waters, G. S. (1992). Articulatory and phonological determinants of word length effects in span tasks.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,45A, 177–192.
Caplan, D., &Waters, G. S. (1994). Articulatory length and phonological similarity in span tasks: A reply to Baddeley and Andrade.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,47, 1055–1062.
Conrad, R., &Hille, B. A. (1958). The decay theory of immediate memory and paced recall.Canadian Journal of Psychology,12, 1–6.
Cowan, N., Day, L., Saults, J. S., Keller, T. A., Johnson, T., &Flores, L. (1992). The role of verbal output time in the effects of word length on immediate memory.Journal of Memory & Language,31, 1–17.
Cowan, N., Nugent, L. D., &Elliott, E. M. (2000). Memory-search and rehearsal processes and the word length effect in immediate recall: A synthesis in reply to Service.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,53A, 666–670.
Cowan, N., Nugent, L. D., Elliott, E. M., &Geer, T. (2000). Is there a temporal basis of the word length effect? A response to Service (1998).Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,53A, 647–660.
Cowan, N., Saults, J. S., &Brown, G. D. A. (2004). On the auditory modality superiority effect in serial recall: Separating input and output factors.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,30, 639–644.
Cowan, N., Saults, J. S., Elliott, E. M., &Moreno, M. (2002). Deconfounding serial recall.Journal of Memory & Language,46, 153–177.
Cowan, N., Wood, N. L., Nugent, L.D., &Treisman, M. (1997). There are two word-length effects in verbal short-term memory: Opposed effects of duration and complexity.Psychological Science,8, 290–295.
Craik, F. I. M., Govoni, R., Naveh-Benjamin, M., &Anderson, N. D. (1996). The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,125, 159–180.
Crowder, R. G. (1976).Principles of learning and memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Dosher, B. A. (1999). Item interference and time delays in working memory: Immediate serial recall.International Journal of Psychology,34, 276–284.
Dosher, B. A., &Ma, J. J. (1998). Output loss or rehearsal loop? Output-time versus pronunciation-time limits in immediate recall for forgetting-matched materials.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 316–335.
Duncan, M., & Lewandowsky, S. (2003).The time-course of response suppression for within- and between-list repetitions. Unpublished manuscript.
Elvevåg, B., Weinberger, D. R., &Goldberg, T. E. (2001). Shortterm memory for serial order in schizophrenia: A detailed examination of error types.Neuropsychology,15, 128–135.
Farrell, S., &Lewandowsky, S. (2002). An endogenous distributed model of ordering in serial recall.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,9, 59–79.
Friedman, W. J. (2001). Memory processes underlying humans’ chronological sense of the past. In C. Hoerl & T. McCormack (Eds.),Time and memory: Issues in philosophy and psychology (pp. 139–167). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Glenberg, A. M., &Swanson, N. (1986). A temporal distinctiveness theory of recency and modality effects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,12, 3–24.
Henson, R. N. A. (1998). Short-term memory for serial order: The start—end model.Cognitive Psychology,36, 73–137.
Henson, R. N. A. (1999). Positional information in short-term memory: Relative or absolute?Memory & Cognition,27, 915–927.
Laming, D. (1992). Analysis of short-term retention: Models for Brown—Peterson experiments.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 1342–1365.
Lewandowsky, S. (1999). Redintegration and response suppression in serial recall: A dynamic network model.International Journal of Psychology,34, 434–446.
Lewandowsky, S., & Brown, G. D. A. (in press). Serial recall and presentation schedule: A micro-analysis of local distinctiveness.Memory.
Lewandowsky, S., &Farrell, S. (2000). A redintegration account of the effects of speech rate, lexicality, and word frequency in immediate serial recall.Psychological Research,63, 163–173.
Lewandowsky, S., &Li, S.-C. (1994). Memory for serial order revisited.Psychological Review,101, 539–543.
Lewandowsky, S., &Murdock, B. B., Jr. (1989). Memory for serial order.Psychological Review,96, 25–58.
Li, S.-C., &Lewandowsky, S. (1993). Intra-list distractors and recall direction: Constraints on models of memory for serial order.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 895–908.
Li, S.-C., &Lewandowsky, S. (1995). Forward and backward recall: Different retrieval processes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 837–847.
Lovatt, P., Avons, S. E., &Masterson, J. (2000). The word-length effect and disyllabic words.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,53A, 1–22.
Lovatt, P., Avons, S. E., &Masterson, J. (2002). Output decay in immediate serial recall: Speech time revisited.Journal of Memory & Language,46, 227–243.
Maybery, M. T., Parmentier, F. B. R., &Jones, D. M. (2002). Grouping of list items reflected in the timing of recall: Implications for models of serial verbal memory.Journal of Memory & Language,47, 360–385.
Maylor, E. A., Vousden, J., &Brown, G. D. A. (1999). Adult age differences in short-term memory for serial order: Data and a model.Psychology & Aging,14, 572–594.
McCormack, T., Brown, G. D. A., Vousden, J., &Henson, R. N. A. (2000). Children’s serial recall errors: Implications for theories of short-term memory development.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,76, 222–252.
McGeoch, J. A. (1932). Forgetting and the law of disuse.Psychological Review,39, 352–370.
Murdock, B. B. (1995). Developing TODAM: Three models for serialorder information.Memory & Cognition,23, 631–645.
Nairne, J. S. (1990). A feature model of immediate memory.Memory & Cognition,18, 251–269.
Nairne, J. S. (2002). Remembering over the short term: The case against the standard model.Annual Review of Psychology,53, 53–81.
Nairne, J. S., Neath, I., &Serra, M. (1997). Proactive interference plays a role in the word-length effect.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 541–545.
Neath, I. (1993). Contextual and distinctive processes and the serial position functions.Journal of Memory & Language,32, 820–840.
Neath, I. (1999). Modelling the disruptive effects of irrelevant speech on order information.International Journal of Psychology,34, 410–418.
Neath, I., &Crowder, R. G. (1990). Schedules of presentation and distinctiveness in human memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 316–327.
Neath, I., &Crowder, R. G. (1996). Distinctiveness and very shortterm serial position effects.Memory,4, 225–242.
Neath, I., &Nairne, J. S. (1995). Word-length effects in immediate memory: Overwriting trace decay theory.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,2, 429–441.
Ng, M. L. H., &Maybery, M. T. (2002). Grouping in short-term verbal memory: Is position coded temporally?Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,55A, 391–424.
Nosofsky, R. M. (1992). Similarity scaling and cognitive process models.Annual Review of Psychology,43, 25–53.
Page, M. P. A., &Norris, D. (1998). The primacy model: A new model of immediate serial recall.Psychological Review,105, 761–781.
Service, E. (1998). The effect of word length on immediate serial recall depends on phonological complexity, not articulatory duration.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,51A, 283–304.
Service, E. (2000). Phonological complexity and word duration in immediate recall: Different paradigms answer different questions—A comment on Cowan, Nugent, Elliott, and Geer.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,53A, 661–665.
Turvey, M. T., Brick, P., &Osborn, J. (1970). Proactive interference in short-term memory as a function of prior-item retention interval.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,22, 142–147.
Waugh, N. C., &Norman, D. A. (1965). Primary memory.Psychological Review,72, 89–104.
Wingfield, A., &Byrnes, D. L. (1972). Decay of information in shortterm memory.Science,176, 690–692.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by a Large Grant from the Australian Research Council to S.L. and an associated Linkage Grant awarded to S.L. and G.D.A.B., and by Grant 88/S15050 from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (U.K.)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lewandowsky, S., Duncan, M. & Brown, G.D.A. Time does not cause forgetting in short-term serial recall. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 11, 771–790 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196705
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196705