Abstract
Dehaene, Bossini, and Giraux (1993) revealed that subjects responded to large numbers faster with the choice on the right than with the choice on the left, whereas the reverse held true for small numbers (SNARC effect). According to Dehaene et al. (1993), the SNARC effect depends on the quantitative representation of number, such as a left-to-right-oriented analog number line. The main goal of the present study was twofold: first, to investigate whether the vertical SNARC effect could be observed, and, second, to verify whether Dehaene et al.’s (1993) explanation of the SNARC effect is correct. Experiments 2A and 2B showed the vertical SNARC effect in a parity judgment task. Subjects responded to large numbers faster with the top choice than with the bottom choice, whereas the reverse held true for small numbers. However, Experiment 3 failed to show the SNARC effect in a number magnitude judgment task, suggesting that the quantitative representation could be dissociated from the spatial code that produces the SNARC effect.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ashcraft, M. H. (1992). Cognitive arithmetic: A review of data and theory.Cognition,44, 75–106.
Bachtold, D., Baumuller, M., &Brugger, P. (1998). Stimulusresponse compatibility in representational space.Neuropsychologia,36, 731–735.
Berch, D. B., Foley, E. J., Hill, R. J., &Ryan, P. M. (1999). Extracting parity and magnitude from Arabic numerals: Developmental changes in number processing and mental representation.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,74, 286–308.
Brysbaert, M. (1995). Arabic number reading: On the nature of the numerical scale and the origin of phonological recoding.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,124, 434–452.
Clark, J. M., &Campbell, J. I. D. (1991). Integrated versus modular theories of number skills and acalculia.Brain & Cognition,17, 204–239.
Cohen, J., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., &Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,25, 257–271.
Dehaene, S. (1989). The psychophysics of numerical comparison: A reexamination of apparently incompatible data.Perception & Psychophysics,45, 557–566.
Dehaene, S. (1992). Varieties of numerical abilities.Cognition,44, 1–42.
Dehaene, S. (1995). Electrophysiological evidence for category-specific word processing in the normal human brain.NeuroReport,6, 2153–2157.
Dehaene, S. (1997).The number sense: How the mind creates mathematics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Dehaene, S., &Akhavein, R. (1995). Attention, automaticity, and level of representation in number processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 314–326.
Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., &Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,122, 371–396.
Dehaene, S., &Cohen, L. (1991). Two mental calculation systems: A case study of severe acalculia with preserved approximation.Neuropsychologia,29, 1045–1074.
Dehaene, S., &Cohen, L. (1995). Towards an anatomical and functional model of number processing.Mathematical Cognition,1, 83–120.
Dehaene, S., &Cohen, L. (1997). Cerebral pathway for calculation: Double dissociation between rote verbal and quantitative knowledge of arithmetic.Cortex,33, 219–250.
Dehaene, S., Dupoux, E., &Mehler, J. (1990). Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 626–641.
Dehaene, S., Spelke, E., Pinel, P., Stanescu, R., &Tsivkin, S. (1999). Source of mathematical thinking: Behavioral and brain-imaging evidence.Science,284, 970–974.
Fias, W. (2001). Two routes for the processing of verbal numbers: Evidence from the SNARC effect.Psychological Research,65, 250–259.
Fias, W., Brysbaert, M., Geypens, F., &d’Ydewalle, G. (1996). The importance of magnitude information in numerical processing: Evidence from the SNARC effect.Mathematical Cognition,2, 95–110.
Fias, W., Lauwereyns, J., &Lammertyn, J. (2001). Irrelevant digits affect feature-based attention depending on the overlap of neural circuits.Cognitive Brain Research,12, 415–423.
Galton, F. (1880a). Visualized numerals.Nature,21, 252–256.
Galton, F. (1880b). Visualized numerals.Nature,21, 494–495.
Gevers, W., Reynvoet, B., & Fias, W. (in press). The mental representation of ordinal sequences is spatially organized.Cognition.
Hinrichs, J. V., Yurko, D. S., &Hu, J. M. (1981). Two-digit number comparison: Use of place information.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,7, 890–901.
Ito, Y., &Hatta, T. (2003). Semantic processing of Arabic, Kanji, and Kana numbers: Evidence from interference in physical and numerical size judgments.Memory & Cognition, 31, 360–368.
Krueger, L. E. (1986). Why 2 × 2 + 5 looks so wrong: On the odd-even rule in product verification.Memory & Cognition,14, 141–149.
Krueger, L. E., &Hallford, E. W. (1984). Why 2 + 2 = 5 looks so wrong: On the odd-even rule in sum verification.Memory & Cognition,12, 171–180.
Lammertyn, J., Fias, W., &Lauwereyns, J. (2002). Semantic influences of feature-based attention due to overlap of neural circuits.Cortex,38, 878–882.
Lorch, R. F., Jr., &Myers, J. L. (1990). Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognition research.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 149–157.
Lu, C.-H., &Proctor, R. W. (1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,2, 174–207.
Mapelli, D., Umiltà, C., Nicoletti, R., Fanini, A., &Capezzani, L. (1996). Prelexical representational space.Cognitive Neuropsychology,13, 229–255.
Marks, D. (1972). Relative judgment: A phenomenon and theory.Psychophysics,11, 156–160.
Moyer, R. S., &Landauer, T. K. (1967). Time required for judgment of inequality.Nature,215, 1519–1520.
Naccache, L., &Dehaene, S. (2001). Unconscious semantic priming extends to novel unseen stimuli.Cognition,80, 223–237.
Noel, M. P. (2001). Numerical cognition. In R. Brenda (Ed.),The handbook of cognitive neuropsychology: What deficits reveal about the human mind (pp. 495–518). London: Psychology Press, Taylor & Francis.
Pinel, P., Le Clec’H, G. L., van de Moortele, P. F., Naccache, L., Le Bihan, D. L., &Dehaene, S. (1999). Event-related fMRI analysis of the cerebral circuit for numeral comparison.NeuroReport,10, 1473–1479.
Proctor, R.W., &Dutta, A. (1993). Do the same stimulus-response relations influence choice reactions initially and after practice?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 922–930.
Proctor, R. W., Lu, C. H., &van Zandt, T. (1992). Enhancement of the Simon effect by response precuing.Acta Psychologica,74, 53–74.
Proctor, R.W., &Reeve, T. G. (Eds.) (1990).Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Ratinckx, E., &Brysbaert, M. (2002). Interhemispheric Stroop-like interference in number comparison: Evidence for strong interhemispheric integration of semantic number information.Neuropsychology,16, 217–229.
Reynvoet, B., &Brysbaert, M. (1999). Single-digit and two-digit Arabic numerals address the same semantic number line.Cognition,72, 191–201.
Roswarski, T. E., &Proctor, R.W. (1996). Multiple spatial codes and temporal overlap in choice-reaction tasks.Psychological Research,59, 196–211.
Seron, X., Pesenti, M., Noel, M. P., Deloche, G., &Cornet, J. A. (1992). Images of numbers, or “When 98 is upper left and 6 sky blue.”Cognition,44, 159–196.
Simon, J. R., Acosta, E., Jr.,Mewaldt, S. P., &Speidel, C. R. (1976). The effect of an irrelevant directional cue on choice reaction time: Duration of the phenomenon and its relation to stages of processing.Perception & Psychophysics,19, 16–22.
Simon, J. R., Mewaldt, S. P., Acosta, E., &Hu, J. M. (1976). Processing auditory information: Interaction of two population stereotypes.Journal of Applied Psychology,61, 354–358.
Vu, K. P., &Proctor, R. W. (2001). Determinants of right-left and top-bottom prevalence for two-dimensional spatial compatibility.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,27, 813–828.
Willmes, K., & Iversen, W. (1995, April).On the internal representation of number parity. Paper presented at the Spring Annual General Meeting of the British Neuropsychological Society. London.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ito, Y., Hatta, T. Spatial structure of quantitative representation of numbers: Evidence from the SNARC effect. Memory & Cognition 32, 662–673 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195857
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195857