Abstract
When a person views an object, the action the object evokes appears to be activated independently of the person’s intention to act. We demonstrate two further properties of this vision-to-action process. First, it is not completely automatic, but is determined by the stimulus properties of the object that are attended. Thus, when a person discriminates the shape of an object, action affordance effects are observed; but when a person discriminates an object’s color, no affordance effects are observed. The former, shape property is associated with action, such as how an object might be grasped; the latter, color property is irrelevant to action. Second, we also show that the action state of an object influences evoked action. Thus, active objects, with which current action is implied, produce larger affordance effects than passive objects, with which no action is implied. We suggest that the active object activates action simulation processes similar to those proposed in mirror systems.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
di Pellegrino, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., &Rizzolatti, G. (1992). Understanding motor events: A neurophysiological study.Experimental Brain Research,91, 176–180.
Ellis, R., &Tucker, M. (2000). Micro-affordance: The potentiation of components of action by seen objects.British Journal of Psychology,91, 451–471.
Ferrari, P. F., Rozzi, S., &Fogassi, L. (2005). Mirror neurons responding to observation of actions made with tools in monkey ventral premotor cortex.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,17, 212–226.
Gibson, J. J. (1979).The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Hommel, B. (1994). Spontaneous decay of response-code activation.Psychological Research,56, 261–268.
Hommel, B. (1995). Stimulus-response compatibility and the Simon effect: Toward an empirical clarification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,21, 764–775.
Kohler, E., Keysers, C., Umiltà, M. A., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., &Rizzolatti, G. (2002). Hearing sounds, understanding actions: Action representation in mirror neurons.Science,297, 846–848.
Lhermitte, F. (1983). “Utilization behaviour” and its relation to lesions of the frontal lobes.Brain,106, 237–255.
Michaels, C. F. (1988). S-R compatibility between response position and destination of apparent motion: Evidence of the detection of affordances.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,14, 231–240.
Phillips, J. C., &Ward, R. (2002). S-R correspondence effects of irrelevant visual affordance: Time course and specificity of response activation.Visual Cognition,9, 540–558.
Prinz, W. (1990). A common coding approach to perception and action. In O. Neumann & W. Prinz (Eds.),Relationships between perception and action: Current approaches (pp. 167–201). Berlin: Springer.
Prinz, W., &Hommel, B. (Eds.) (2002).Attention and performance XIX: Common mechanisms in perception and action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rizzolatti, G., &Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system.Annual Review of Neuroscience,27, 169–192.
Simon, J. R. (1969). Reactions toward the source of stimulation.Journal of Experimental Psychology,81, 174–176.
Tucker, M., &Ellis, R. (1998). On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 830–846.
Tucker, M., &Ellis, R. (2004). Action priming by briefly presented objects.Acta Psychologica,116, 185–203.
Umiltà, M. A., Kohler, E., Gallese, V., Fogassi, L., Fadiga, L., Keysers, C., &Rizzolatti, G. (2001). I know what you are doing: A neurophysiological study.Neuron,31, 155–165.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by Economic and Social Research Council Grant RES-000-23-0429, awarded to S.P.T. and A.E.H.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tipper, S.P., Paul, M.A. & Hayes, A.E. Vision-for-action: The effects of object property discrimination and action state on affordance compatibility effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 13, 493–498 (2006). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193875
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193875