Abstract
The present study investigated the relative contribution of bottom-up and top-down control to task selection in the voluntary task-switching (VTS) procedure. In order to manipulate the efficiency of top-down control, a concurrent working memory load was imposed during VTS. In three experiments, bottom-up factors, such as stimulus repetitions, repetition of irrelevant information, and stimulus-task associations, were introduced in order to investigate their influence on task selection. We observed that the tendency to repeat tasks was stronger under load, suggesting that top-down control counteracts the automatic tendency to repeat tasks. The results also indicated that task selection can be guided by several elements in the environment, but that only the influence of stimulus repetitions depends on the efficiency of top-down control. The theoretical implications of these findings are discussed within the interplay between top-down and bottom-up control that underlies the voluntary selection of tasks.
Article PDF
References
Allport, A., & Wylie, G. (2000). Task switching, stimulus-response bindings, and negative priming. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 35–70). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Arrington, C. M. (2008). The effect of stimulus availability on task choice in voluntary task switching. Memory & Cognition, 36, 991–997. doi:10.3758/MC.36.5.991
Arrington, C. M., & Logan, G. D. (2004). Episodic and semantic components of the compound-stimulus strategy in the explicit taskcuing procedure. Memory & Cognition, 32, 965–976.
Arrington, C. M., & Logan, G. D. (2005). Voluntary task switching: Chasing the elusive homunculus. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31, 683–702. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.4.683
Baddeley, A. [D.] (1992). Working memory. Science, 255, 556–559. doi:10.1126/science.1736359
Hommel, B. (1998). Event files: Evidence for automatic integration of stimulus-response episodes. Visual Cognition, 5, 183–216.
Hübner, R., & Druey, M. D. (2006). Response execution, selection, or activation: What is sufficient for response-related repetition effects under task shifting? Psychological Research, 70, 245–261. doi:10.1007/s00426-005-0219-8
Lavie, N. (2005). Distracted and confused?: Selective attention under load. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 75–82.
Liefooghe, B., Demanet, J., & Vandierendonck, A. (2009). Is advance reconfiguration in voluntary task switching affected by the design employed? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 850–857. doi:10.1080/17470210802570994
Liefooghe, B., Vandierendonck, A., Muyllaert, I., Verbruggen, F., & Vanneste, W. (2005). The phonological loop in task alternation and task repetition. Memory, 13, 550–560. doi:10.1080/ 09658210444000250
Lien, M.-C., & Ruthruff, E. (2008). Inhibition of task set: Converging evidence from task choice in the voluntary task-switching paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 1111–1116. doi:10.3758/ PBR.15.6.1111
Logan, G. D. (2007). What it costs to implement a plan: Plan-level and task-level contributions to switch costs. Memory & Cognition, 35, 591–602.
Logan, G. D., & Gordon, R. D. (2001). Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations. Psychological Review, 108, 393–434. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.2.393
Mattler, U. (2003). Priming of mental operations by masked stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 167–187.
Mayr, U., & Bell, T. (2006). On how to be unpredictable: Evidence from the voluntary task-switching paradigm. Psychological Science, 17, 774–780. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01781.x
Mayr, U., & Bryck, R. L. (2007). Outsourcing control to the environment: Effects of stimulus/response locations on task selection. Psychological Research, 71, 107–116. doi:10.1007/s00426-005-0039-x
Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24, 167–202. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167
Rapoport, A., & Budescu, D. V. (1997). Randomization in individual choice behavior. Psychological Review, 104, 603–617.
Soetens, E. (1998). Localizing sequential effects in serial choice reaction time with the information reduction procedure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 547–568.
Stevens, M., Lammertyn, J., Verbruggen, F., & Vandierendonck, A. (2006). Tscope: A C library for programming cognitive experiments on the MS Windows platform. Behavior Research Methods, 38, 280–286.
Vandierendonck, A., De Vooght, G., & Van der Goten, K. (1998). Does random time interval generation interfere with working memory executive functions? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 10, 413–442.
Verbruggen, F., & Logan, G. D. (2008). Automatic and controlled response inhibition: Associative learning in the go/no-go and stopsignal paradigms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 649–672. doi:10.1037/a0013170
Verbruggen, F., & Logan, G. D. (2009). Automaticity of cognitive control: Goal priming in response-inhibition paradigms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 35, 1381–1388. doi:10.1037/a0016645
Waszak, F., Hommel, B., & Allport, A. (2003). Task-switching and long-term priming: Role of episodic stimulus-task bindings in taskshift costs. Cognitive Psychology, 46, 361–413. doi:10.1016/S0010-0285(02)00520-0
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Demanet, J., Verbruggen, F., Liefooghe, B. et al. Voluntary task switching under load: Contribution of top-down and bottom-up factors in goal-directed behavior. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 17, 387–393 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.3.387
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.3.387