Abstract
Some of the most important information we encounter changes so rapidly that our perceptual systems cannot process all of it in detail. Spatially selective attention is critical for perception when more information than can be processed in detail is presented simultaneously at distinct locations. When presented with complex, rapidly changing information, listeners may need to selectively attend to specific times rather than to locations. We present evidence that listeners can direct selective attention to time points that differ by as little as 500 msec, and that doing so improves target detection, affects baseline neural activity preceding stimulus presentation, and modulates auditory evoked potentials at a perceptually early stage. These data demonstrate that attentional modulation of early perceptual processing is temporally precise and that listeners can flexibly allocate temporally selective attention over short intervals, making it a viable mechanism for preferentially processing the most relevant segments in rapidly changing streams.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bendixen, A., Grimm, S., & Schröger, E. (2006). The relation between onset, offset, and duration perception as examined by psychophysical data and event-related brain potentials. Journal of Psychophysiology, 20, 40–51.
Bregman, A. (2002). The auditory scene. In D. J. Levitin (Ed.), Founda tions of cognitive psychology: Core readings (pp. 213–248). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bush, W., Sanders, L., & Cave, K. (2007, May). Spatial distribution of visual attention across cued and uncued locations: An ERP study. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Cognitive Neuroscience Society, New York.
Cherry, E. (1953). Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and with two ears. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 25, 975–979.
Clark, V., & Hillyard, S. (1996). Spatial selective attention affects early extrastriate but not striate components of the visual evoked potential. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 387–402.
Correa, A., Lupiáñez, J., Madrid, E., & Tudela, P. (2006). Temporal attention enhances early visual processing: A review and new evidence from event-related potentials. Brain Research, 1076, 116–128.
Correa, A., Lupiáñez, J., Milliken, B., & Tudela, P. (2004). Endogenous temporal orienting of attention in detection and discrimination tasks. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 264–278.
Correa, A., Lupiáñez, J., & Tudela, P. (2005). Attentional preparation based on temporal expectancy modulates processing at the perceptual level. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 328–334.
Correa, A., Lupiáñez, J., & Tudela, P. (2006). The attentional mechanism of temporal orienting: Determinants and attributes. Experimental Brain Research, 169, 58–68.
Coull, J., Frith, C., Büchel, C., & Nobre, A. (2000). Orienting attention in time: Behavioral and neuroanatomical distinction between exogenous and endogenous shifts. Neuropsychologia, 38, 808–819.
Coull, J., & Nobre, A. (1998). Where and when to pay attention: The neural systems for directing attention to spatial locations and to time intervals as revealed by both PET and fMRI. Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 7426–7435.
Cusack, R., & Carlyon, R. (2003). Perceptual asymmetries in audition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 713–725.
Doherty, J., Rao, A., Mesulam, M., & Nobre, A. (2005). Synergistic effect of combined temporal and spatial expectations on visual attention. Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 8259–8266.
Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433–458.
Eimer, M. (1999). Attending to quadrants and ring-shaped regions: ERP effects of visual attention in different spatial selection tasks. Psychophysiology, 36, 491–503.
Garner, W. (1987). Location and color as cuing dimensions in contingent classification. Perception & Psychophysics, 41, 202–210.
Griffin, I., Miniussi, C., & Nobre, A. (2001). Orienting attention in time. Frontiers in Bioscience, 6, 660–671.
Griffin, I., Miniussi, C., & Nobre, A. (2002). Multiple mechanisms of selective attention: Differential modulation of stimulus processing by attention to space or time. Neuropsychologia, 40, 2325–2340.
Grondin, S. (2001). From physical time to the first and second moments of psychological time. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 22–44.
Grondin, S. (2003). Sensory modalities and temporal processing. In H. Helfrich (Ed.), Time and mind II: Information processing perspectives (pp. 61–77). Ashland, OH: Hogrefe & Huber.
Hansen, J., & Hillyard, S. (1980). Endogenous brain potentials associated with selective auditory attention. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 49, 277–290.
Heinze, H.-J., Luck, S., Mangun, G., & Hillyard, S. (1990). Visual event-related potentials index focused attention within bilateral stimulus arrays: I. Evidence for early selection. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 75, 511–527.
Hillyard, S. (1981). Selective auditory attention and early event-related potentials: A rejoinder. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 35, 159–174.
Hillyard, S., Hink, R., Schwent, V., & Picton, T. (1973). Electrical signs of selective attention in the human brain. Science, 182, 177–179.
Hillyard, S., Vogel, E., & Luck, S. (1998). Sensory gain control (amplification) as a mechanism of selective attention: Electrophysiological and neuroimaging evidence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B, 353, 1257–1270.
Hillyard, S., Woldorff, M., Mangun, G., & Hansen, J. (1987). Mechanisms of early selective attention in auditory and visual mo-dalities. In R. J. Ellingson, N. M. F. Murray, & A. M. Halliday (Eds.), The London Symposia (pp. 317–324). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Kasai, T., Morotomi, T., Katayama, J., & Kumada, T. (2003). Attending to a location in three-dimensional space modulates early ERPs. Cognitive Brain Research, 17, 273–285.
Kubovy, M. (1981). Concurrent-pitch segregation and the theory of indispensable attributes. In M. Kubovy & J. Pomerantz (Eds.), Perceptual organization (pp. 55–98). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Lange, K., & Röder, B. (2006). Orienting attention to points in time improves stimulus processing both within and across modalities. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 715–729.
Lange, K., Rösler, F., & Röder, B. (2003). Early processing stages are modulated when auditory stimuli are presented at an attended moment in time: An event-related potential study. Psychophysiology, 40, 806–817.
Luck, S. (2005). An introduction to the event-related potential technique. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Macar, F., & Vidal, F. (2004). Event-related potentials as indices of time processing: A review. Journal of Psychophysiology, 18, 89–104.
Martens, S., & Johnson, A. (2005). Timing attention: Cuing target onset interval attenuates the attentional blink. Memory & Cognition, 33, 234–240.
Milliken, B., Lupiáñez, J., Roberts, M., & Stevanovski, B. (2003). Orienting in space and time: Joint contributions to exogenous spatial cuing effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 877–883.
Miniussi, C., Wilding, E., Coull, J., & Nobre, A. (1999). Orienting attention in time: Modulation of brain potentials. Brain, 122, 1507–1518.
Näätänen, R., Gaillard, A., & Mäntysalo, S. (1978). Early selective-attention effects on evoked potential reinterpreted. Acta Psychologica, 42, 313–329.
Näätänen, R., Teder-Sälejärvi, W., Alho, K., & Lavikainen, J. (1992). Auditory attention and selective input modulation: A topographical ERP study. NeuroReport, 3, 493–496.
Neville, H., & Lawson, D. (1987). Attention to central and peripheral visual space in a movement detection task: III. Separate effects of auditory deprivation and acquisition of a visual language. Brain Research, 405, 284–294.
Nobre, A. (2001). Orienting attention to instants in time. Neuropsychologia, 39, 1317–1328.
Nobre, A., & O’Reilly, J. (2004). Time is of the essence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 387–389.
Posner, M. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3–25.
Posner, M., Snyder, C., & Davidson, B. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 160–174.
Pouthas, V., Garnero, L., Ferrandez, A.-M., & Renault, B. (2000). ERPs and PET analysis of time perception: Spatial and temporal brain mapping during visual discrimination tasks. Human Brain Mapping, 10, 49–60.
Roth, W., Ford, J., Lewis, S., & Kopell, B. (1976). Effects of stimulus probability and task-relevance on event-related potentials. Psychophysiology, 13, 311–317.
Ruchkin, D., McCalley, M., & Glaser, E. (1977). Event related potentials and time estimation. Psychophysiology, 14, 451–455.
Sanders, L., & Neville, H. (2003). An ERP study of continuous speech processing. I. Segmentation, semantics, and syntax in native speakers. Cognitive Brain Research, 15, 228–240.
Sanders, L., Newport, E., & Neville, H. (2002). Segmenting nonsense: An event-related potential index of perceived onsets in continuous speech. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 700–703.
Sanders, L., & Poeppel, D. (2007). Local and global auditory processing: Behavioral and ERP evidence. Neuropsychologia, 45, 1172–1186.
Shedden, J., & Nordgaard, C. (2001). ERP time course of perceptual and post-perceptual mechanisms of spatial selection. Cognitive Brain Research, 11, 59–75.
Talsma, D., & Woldorff, M. (2005). Selective attention and multisensory integration: Multiple phases of effects on the evoked brain activity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 1098–1114.
Van Boxtel, G., & Böcker, K. (2004). Cortical measures of anticipation. Journal of Psychophysiology, 18, 61–76.
Woldorff, M., Fox, P., Matzke, M., Lancaster, J., Veeraswamy, S., Zamarripa, F., et al. (1997). Retinotopic organization of early visual spatial attention effects as revealed by PET and ERPs. Human Brain Mapping, 5, 280–286.
Wright, B., & Fitzgerald, M. (2004). The time course of attention in a simple auditory detection task. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 508–516.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This study was supported by NIH NIDCD Grant R03DC008684 to L.D.S. as well as by NIH training support (5T32 NS007490) to L.B.A.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sanders, L.D., Astheimer, L.B. Temporally selective attention modulates early perceptual processing: Event-related potential evidence. Perception & Psychophysics 70, 732–742 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/PP.70.4.732
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/PP.70.4.732