Abstract
Abundant experimental evidence has demonstrated attentional selection within the visual modality. Furthermore, the consensus view is currently that two processes contribute to selection: the amplification of the target stimuli and the ignoring (or suppression) of any distractor information. However, at present it is less clear how selection is achieved within the tactile modality. In the present study, we analyze the aftereffects of ignoring tactile distractors, in a novel tactile variant of the negative priming paradigm. In the typical negative priming paradigm, repeating an ignored distractor stimulus as the target on the following trial usually leads to a cost in terms of reaction times (RTs) or error rates, thereby indicating that selection is achieved in part by the ignoring of distractors. In two experiments, we observed significant RT costs when a previously ignored vibrotactile stimulus constituted the target in the next trial. This result shows that tactile selection is in part achieved by active ignoring of distractor representations, as has been shown previously in both the visual and auditory modalities.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allport, A. (1987). Selection for action: Some behavioral and neurophysiological considerations of attention and action. In H. Heuer & A. F. Sanders (Eds.), Perspectives on perception and action (pp. 395–419). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Allport, A. (1993). Attention and control: Have we been asking the wrong questions? A critical review of twenty-five years. In D. E. Meyer & S. Kornblum (Eds.), Attention and performance XIV: Synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence, and cognitive neuroscience (pp. 183–218). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Brungart, D. S., Simpson, B. D., Ericson, M. A., & Scott, K. R. (2001). Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of multiple simultaneous talkers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110, 2527–2538.
Buchner, A., Zabal, A., & Mayr, S. (2003). Auditory, visual, and cross-modal negative priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 917–923.
Calvert, G. A., Spence, C., & Stein, B. E. (Eds.) (2004). The handbook of multisensory processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Craig, J. C. (1974). Vibrotactile difference thresholds for intensity and the effect of a masking stimulus. Perception & Psychophysics, 15, 123–127.
Craig, J. C. (1995). Vibrotactile masking: The role of response competition. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 1190–1200.
Craig, J. C. (2000). Processing of sequential tactile patterns: Effects of a neutral stimulus. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 596–606.
Craig, J. C., & Evans, P. M. (1995). Tactile selective attention and temporal masking. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 511–518.
Dell’Acqua, R., Jolicoeur, P., Sessa, P., & Turatto, M. (2006). Attentional blink and selection in the tactile domain. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 18, 537–559.
Dell’Acqua, R., Turatto, M., & Jolicoeur, P. (2001). Cross-modal attentional deficits in processing tactile stimulation. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 777–789.
Driver, J., & Grossenbacher, P. G. (1996). Multimodal spatial constraints on tactile selective attention. In T. Inui & J. L. McClelland (Eds.), Attention and performance XVI: Information integration in perception and communication (pp. 209–235). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Bradford Books.
Evans, P. M., & Craig, J. C. (1991). Tactile attention and the perception of moving tactile stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 355–364.
Fox, E. (1995). Negative priming from ignored distractors in visual selection: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 145–173.
Frings, C. (2006). Relevant distractors do not cause negative priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 322–327.
Frings, C., & Wentura, D. (2006a). Negative priming is stronger for task-relevant dimensions: Evidence of flexibility in the selective ignoring of distractor information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 683–693.
Frings, C., & Wentura, D. (2006b). Strategy effects counteract distractor inhibition: Negative priming with constantly absent probe distractors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 32, 854–864.
Frings, C., & Wühr, P. (2007). Prime display offset modulates negative priming only for easy-selection tasks. Memory & Cognition, 35, 504–513.
Hillstrom, A. P., Shapiro, K. L., & Spence, C. (2002). Attentional limitations in processing sequentially presented vibrotactile targets. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 1068–1082.
Houghton, G., & Tipper, S. P. (1994). A model of inhibitory mechanisms in selective attention. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 53–112). San Diego: Academic Press.
Houghton, G., Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B., & Shore, D. I. (1996). Inhibition and interference in selective attention: Some tests of a neural network model. Visual Cognition, 3, 119–164.
Johnston, W. A., & Dark, V. J. (1986). Selective attention. Annual Review of Psychology, 37, 43–75.
Joordens, S., Betancourt, I., & Spalek, T. M. (2006). Selective attention versus selection for action: Negative priming is not the result of distractors being unattended. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 890–896.
Kane, M. J., May, C. P., Hasher, L., Rahhal, T., & Stoltzfus, E. R. (1997). Dual mechanisms of negative priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 632–650.
MacLeod, C. M., Chiappe, D. L., & Fox, E. (2002). The crucial roles of stimulus matching and stimulus identity in negative priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 521–528.
Marks, L. E. (2004). Cross-modal interactions in speeded classification. In G. A. Calvert, C. Spence, & B. E. Stein (Eds.), The handbook of multisensory processes (pp. 85–105). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
May, C. P., Kane, M. J., & Hasher, L. (1995). Determinants of negative priming. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 35–54.
Mayr, S., & Buchner, A. (2006). Evidence for episodic retrieval of inadequate prime responses in auditory negative priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 32, 932–943.
Milliken, B., Joordens, S., Merikle, P. M., & Seiffert, A. E. (1998). Selective attention: A reevaluation of the implications of negative priming. Psychological Review, 105, 203–229.
Neill, W. T. (1997). Episodic retrieval in negative priming and repetition priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 1291–1305.
Neumann, O. (1996). Theories of attention. In O. Neumann & A. F. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of perception and action: Vol. 3. Attention (pp. 389–446). San Diego: Academic Press.
Pashler, H. E. (1998). The psychology of attention. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Röder, B., Kusmierek, A., Spence, C., & Schicke, T. (2007). Developmental vision determines the reference frame for the multisensory control of action. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 4753–4758.
Rothermund, K., Wentura, D., & De Houwer, J. (2005). Retrieval of incidental stimulus-response associations as a source of negative priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31, 482–495.
Ruthruff, E., & Miller, J. (1995). Negative priming depends on ease of selection. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 715–723.
Simon, J. R. (1990). The effects of an irrelevant directional cue on human information processing. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective (pp. 31–86). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Soto-Faraco, S., Ronald, A., & Spence, C. (2004). Tactile selective attention and body posture: Assessing the multisensory contributions of vision and proprioception. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 1077–1094.
Soto-Faraco, S., Spence, C., Fairbank, K., Kingstone, A., Hillstrom, A. P., & Shapiro, K. (2002). A crossmodal attentional blink between vision and touch. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 731–738.
Spence, C., & Driver, J. (Eds.) (2004). Crossmodal space and crossmodal attention. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Spence, C., Lloyd, D., McGlone, F., Nicholls, M. E. R., & Driver, J. (2000). Inhibition of return is supramodal: A demonstration between all possible pairings of vision, touch, and audition. Experimental Brain Research, 134, 42–48.
Spence, C., Nicholls, M. E. R., Gillespie, N., & Driver, J. (1998). Cross-modal links in exogenous covert spatial orienting between touch, audition, and vision. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 544–557.
Tipper, S. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37A, 571–590.
Tipper, S. P. (2001). Does negative priming reflect inhibitory mechanisms? A review and integration of conflicting views. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 321–343.
Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Uttal, W. R. (1960). Inhibitory interaction of responses to electrical stimuli in the fingers. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 53, 47–51.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Frings, C., Bader, R. & Spence, C. Selection in touch: Negative priming with tactile stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics 70, 516–523 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/PP.70.3.516
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/PP.70.3.516