Abstract
In mathematics, the ordinal (relative) magnitude of a numerical object conveys a separate meaning from its cardinal (absolute) magnitude, whereas its physical size bears no inherent relationship to its magnitude. In numerical cognition, the ordinal—cardinal distinction has been scarcely addressed, whereas the size—magnitude distinction has been studied extensively, with the surprising demonstration of an interaction between semantic magnitude and physical size (Besner & Coltheart, 1979). The present work used coins to study the intricate relations between these meanings. In two experiments, Israeli observers (Experiment 1) and American observers (Experiment 2) performed numerical and physical comparative judgments of coins. Consensual markers of magnitude activation (e.g., the size congruity effect and the distance effect) were obtained. The results of the two experiments converged on the same conclusions. Comparisons of value were governed by ordinal magnitude. Magnitude interfered with comparisons of size, but size did not affect value. The results provided a set of clear dissociations between cardinal and ordinal magnitude and between value and size of coins. They highlight the important role played by ordinal information in magnitude processing.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ben Nathan, M., Shaki, S., Salti, M., & Algom, D. (2009). Numbers and space: Associations and dissociations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 578–582.
Besner, D., & Coltheart, M. (1979). Ideographic and alphabetic processing in skilled reading of English. Neuropsychologia, 17, 467–472.
Choplin, J. M., & Logan, G. D. (2005). A memory-based account of automatic numerosity processing. Memory & Cognition, 33, 17–28.
Damian, M. F. (2004). Asymmetries in the processing of Arabic digits and number words. Memory & Cognition, 32, 164–171.
Dehaene, S., Dupoux, E., & Mehler, J. (1990). Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 626–641.
Fias, W., Reynvoet, B., & Brysbaert, M. (2001). Are Arabic numerals processed as pictures in a Stroop interference task? Psychological Research, 65, 242–249.
Fitousi, D., & Algom, D. (2006). Size congruity effects with two-digit numbers: Expanding the number line? Memory & Cognition, 34, 445–457.
Fitousi, D., Shaki, S., & Algom, D. (2009). The role of parity, physical size, and magnitude in numerical cognition: The SNARC effect revisited. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71, 143–155.
Frege, G. (1884). Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik. Jena: Hermann Pohle.
Moyer, R. S. (1973). Comparing objects in memory: Evidence suggesting an internal psychophysics. Perception & Psychophysics, 13, 180–184.
Moyer, R. S., & Dumais, S. T. (1978). Mental comparison. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 12, pp. 117–155). New York: Academic Press.
Moyer, R. S., & Landauer, T. K. (1967). Time required forjudgments of numerical inequality. Nature, 215, 1519–1520.
Paivio, A. (1975). Perceptual comparisons through the mind’s eye. Memory & Cognition, 3, 635–647.
Petrusic, W. M. (1992). Semantic congruity effects and theories of the comparison process. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 962–986.
Piazza, M., Pinel, P., Bihan, D. L., & Dehaene, S. (2007). A magnitude code common to numerosities and number symbols in human intraparietal cortex. Neuron, 53, 293–305.
Restle, F. (1970). Speed of adding and comparing numbers. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83, 274–278.
Russell, B. (1919). Introduction to mathematical philosophy. London: Allen & Unwin.
Shepard, R. N., Kilpatrick, D. W., & Cunningham, J. P. (1975). The internal representation of number. Cognitive Psychology, 1, 82–138.
Shoben, E. J., Cech, C. G., Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Sailor, K. M. (1989). Serial position effects in comparative judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15, 273–286.
Tzelgov, J., Meyer, J., & Henik, A. (1992). Automatic and intentional processing of numerical information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 18, 166–179.
Walsh, V. (2003). A theory of magnitude: Common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 483–488.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was performed while the author was at Tel-Aviv University and at Pennsylvania State University
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fitousi, D. Dissociating between cardinal and ordinal and between the value and size magnitudes of coins. Psychon Bull Rev 17, 889–894 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.6.889
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.6.889