Abstract
We investigated the role of vision in tactile enumeration within and outside the subitizing range. Congenitally blind and sighted (blindfolded) participants were asked to enumerate quickly and accurately the number of fingers stimulated. Both groups of participants enumerated one to three fingers quickly and accurately but were much slower and less accurate with four to nine fingers. Within the subitizing range, blind participants performed no differently from both sighted (blindfolded) and sighted-seeing participants. Outside of the subitizing range, blind and sighted-seeing participants showed better performance than did sighted-blindfolded participants, suggesting that lack of access to the predominant sensory modality does affect performance. Together, these findings further support the claim that subitizing is a general perceptual mechanism and demonstrate that vision is not necessary for the development of the subitizing mechanism.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Camos, V., & Tillmann, B. (2008). Discontinuity in the enumeration of sequentially presented auditory and visual stimuli. Cognition, 107, 1135–1143.
Castronovo, J., & Seron, X. (2007). Numerical estimation in blind subjects: Evidence of the impact of blindness and its following experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 33, 1089–1106.
Collignon, O., Renier, L., Bruyer, R., Tranduy, D., & Veraart, C. (2006). Improved selective and divided spatial attention in early blind subjects. Brain Research, 1075, 175–182.
Dehaene, S., & Cohen, L. (1994). Dissociable mechanisms of subitizing and counting: Neuropsychological evidence from simultanagnosic patients. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 958–975.
de Hevia, M. D., Vallar, G., & Girelli, L. (2008). Visualizing numbers in the mind’s eye: The role of visuo-spatial processes in numerical abilities. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 32, 1361–1372.
Fraiberg, S. (1977). Insights from the blind: Comparative studies of blind and sighted infants. New York: Basic Books.
Gaunet, F., Martinez, J.-L., & Thinus-Blanc, C. (1997). Early-blind subjects’ spatial representation of manipulatory space: Exploratory strategies and reaction to change. Perception, 26, 345–366.
Gaunet, F., & Rossetti, Y. (2006). Effects of visual deprivation on space representation: Immediate and delayed pointing toward memorised proprioceptive targets. Perception, 35, 107–124.
Hartlage, L. C. (1969). Verbal tests of spatial conceptualization. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 80, 180–182.
Hubbard, E. M., Piazza, M., Pinel, P., & Dehaene, S. (2005). Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 435–448.
Jevons, W. S. (1871). The power of numerical discrimination. Nature, 3, 281–282.
Kaufman, E. L., Lord, M. W., Reese, T. W., & Volkmann, J. (1949). The discrimination of visual number. American Journal of Psychology, 62, 498–525.
Lewald, J. (2002). Opposing effects of head position on sound localization in blind and sighted human subjects. European Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 1219–1224.
Logan, G. D., & Zbrodoff, N. J. (2003). Subitizing and similarity: Toward a pattern-matching theory of enumeration. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 676–682.
Mandler, G., & Shebo, B. J. (1982). Subitizing: An analysis of its component processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111, 1–22.
Nan, Y., Knösche, T. R., & Luo, Y.-J. (2006). Counting in everyday life: Discrimination and enumeration. Neuropsychologia, 44, 1103–1113.
Olivers, C. N. L., & Watson, D. G. (2008). Subitizing requires attention. Visual Cognition, 16, 439–462.
Piazza, M., Giacomini, E., e Bihan, D., &, Dehaene, S. (2003). Single-trial classification of parallel pre-attentive and serial attentive processes using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 270, 1237–1245.
Plaisier, M. A., Bergmann Tiest, W. M., & Kappers, A. M. L. (2009a). One, two, three, many—Subitizing in active touch. Acta Psychologica, 131, 163–170.
Plaisier, M. A., Bergmann Tiest, W. M., & Kappers, A. M. L. (2009b). Salient features in 3-D haptic shape perception. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71, 421–430.
Revkin, S. K., Piazza, M., Izard, V., Cohen, L., & Dehaene, S. (2008). Does subitizing reflect numerical estimation? Psychological Science, 19, 607–614.
Riggs, K. J., Ferrand, L., Lancelin, D., Fryziel, L., Dumur, G., & Simpson, A. (2006). Subitizing in tactile perception. Psychological Science, 17, 271–272.
Röder, B., Rösler, F., & Neville, H. J. (1999). Effects of interstimulus interval on auditory event-related potentials in congenitally blind and normally sighted humans. Neuroscience Letters, 264, 53–56.
Sathian, K., Simon, T. J., Peterson, S., Patel, G. A., Hoffman, J. M., & Grafton, S. T. (1999). Neural evidence linking visual object enumeration and attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 36–51.
Trick, L. M. (2008). More than superstition: Differential effects of featural heterogeneity and change on subitizing and counting. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 743–760.
Trick, L. M., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1993). What enumeration studies can show us about spatial attention: Evidence for limited capacity preattentive processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 331–351.
Trick, L. M., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1994). Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision. Psychological Review, 101, 80–102.
von Senden, M. (1960). Space and sight: The perception of space and shape in the congenitally blind before and after operation (P. Heath, Trans.). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Vuokko, E., Niemivirta, M., & Helenius, P. (2009, December). Different brain mechanisms for subitizing and counting revealed by MEG. Poster presented at the Workshop on Learning, Mind, and Brain, Helsinki, Finland.
Warren, H. C. (1897). The reaction time of counting. Psychological Review, 4, 569–591.
Zwiers, M. P., Van Opstal, A. J., & Cruysberg, J. R. M. (2001). A spatial hearing deficit in early-blind humans. Journal of Neuroscience, 21(9, Art. RC142).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ferrand, L., Riggs, K.J. & Castronovo, J. Subitizing in congenitally blind adults. Psychon Bull Rev 17, 840–845 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.6.840
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.6.840