Abstract
What role do surface features (e.g., color) play in the establishment and maintenance of episodic representations of objects (object files)? Mitroff and Alvarez (2007) showed that stimuli that were linked by a continuous spatiotemporal history yielded object-specific preview benefits—a standard index of object files—whereas stimuli linked only by shared surface features did not. Here, it is shown that abruptly changing the features of an object that has been established on the basis of spatiotemporal history can disrupt object-specific preview benefits (Experiments 1 and 2). Moreover, under some conditions, feature match alone can give rise to the preview benefits (Experiment 3). These results indicate that surface features, as well as spatiotemporal factors, play an important role in establishing and maintaining episodic object representations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436.
Burt, P., & Sperling, G. (1981). Time, distance, and feature trade-offs in visual apparent motion. Psychological Review, 88, 171–195.
Dawson, M. R. (1991). The how and why of what went where in apparent motion: Modeling solutions to the motion correspondence problem. Psychological Review, 98, 569–603.
Flombaum, J. I., & Scholl, B. J. (2006). A temporal same-object advantage in the tunnel effect: Facilitated change detection for persisting objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 32, 840–853.
Flombaum, J. I., Scholl, B. J., & Santos, L. R. (2009). Spatiotemporal priority as a fundamental principle of object persistence. In B. Hood & L. Santos (Eds.), The origins of object knowledge (pp. 135–164). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hein, E., & Moore, C. M. (2009) The role of surface features for correspondencen in apparent motion. Poster presented at the annual conference of the Vision Sciences Society, Naples, FL.
Hollingworth, A., & Franconeri, S. L. (2009). Object correspondence across brief occlusion is established on the basis of both spatiotemporal and surface features. Cognition, 113, 150–166.
Hollingworth, A., Richard, A. M., & Luck, S. J. (2008). Understanding the function of visual short-term memory: Transsaccadic memory, object correspondence, and gaze correction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 163–181.
Kahneman, D., Treisman, A., & Gibbs, B. J. (1992). The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 175–219.
Kolers, P. A. (1972). Aspects of motion perception. New York: Pergamon.
Kolers, P. A., & Pomerantz, J. R. (1971). Figural change in apparent motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 87, 99–108.
Michotte, A. (1963). The perception of causality (T. R. Miles & E. Miles, Trans.). London: Methuen. (Original work published 1946)
Mitroff, S. R., & Alvarez, G. A. (2007). Space and time, not surface features, underlie object persistence. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 1199–1204.
Moore, C. M., & Enns, J. T. (2004). Substitution masking and the flashlag effect. Psychological Science, 15, 866–871.
Moore, C. M., Mordkoff, J. T., & Enns, J. T. (2007). Path of least persistence: Object status mediates visual updating. Vision Research, 47, 1624–1630.
Neuhaus, W. (1930). Experimentelle Untersuchung der Scheinbewegung. Archiv für die gesamte Psychologie, 75, 315–458.
Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437–442.
Richard, A. M., Luck, S. J., & Hollingworth, A. (2008). Establishing object correspondence across eye movements: Flexible use of spatiotemporal and surface feature information. Cognition, 109, 66–88.
Scholl, B. J. (2007). Object persistence in philosophy and psychology. Mind & Language, 22, 563–591.
Stephens, T. M., & Moore, C. M. (2010). Features, space and time: How does the visual system know what went where when? Manuscript submitted for publication.
Ternus, J. (1950). The problem of phenomenal identity. In W. D. Ellis (Ed. & Trans.), A sourcebook of Gestalt psychology (pp. 149–160). New York: Humanities Press. (Original work published 1926)
Ullman, S. (1979). The interpretation of visual motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Xu, F., & Carey, S. (1996). Infants’ metaphysics: The case of numerical identity. Cognitive Psychology, 30, 111–153.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported by NSF Grant BCS-0818536 to C.M.M.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moore, C.M., Stephens, T. & Hein, E. Features, as well as space and time, guide object persistence. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 17, 731–736 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.5.731
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.5.731