Abstract
A convincing deceiver must act in discordance with their knowledge of the truth. To do so requires the deceiver to resolve competition between what is known to be true and what is intended to be false. We investigated the temporal signature of this competition by examining the action dynamics of arm movement while participants responded falsely or truthfully to autobiographical information. The participants answered no or yes by navigating a Nintendo Wii Remote to no and yes regions on a large projector screen. Trajectory analyses of the fine-grained arm movements show increased complexity in false responding relative to truthful responding, with the greatest difference in false yes answers. The dynamic motor movements also reveal greater strength of competition during the act of false responding, thereby extending traditional response time measures that capture latent competition alone. These results suggest that deceptive processes may be detectable when action is allowed to covary with thought. Supplemental figures and a list of the sentence stimuli may be downloaded from http://pbr.psychonomic-journals.org/content/supplemental.
Article PDF
References
Dale, R., Kehoe, C., & Spivey, M. J. (2007). Graded motor responses in the time course of categorizing atypical exemplars. Memory & Cognition, 35, 15–28.
Dale, R., Roche, J., Snyder, K., & McCall, R. (2008). Exploring action dynamics as an index of paired-associate learning. PLoS ONE, 3, e1728. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001728.
DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. J., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 74–118.
Ekman, P. (1997). Lying and deception. In N. L. Stein, P. A. Ornstein, B. Tversky, & C. Brainerd (Eds.), Memory for everyday and emotional events (pp. 333–348). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Farmer, T. A., Cargill, S. A., Hindy, N. C., Dale, R., & Spivey, M. J. (2007). Tracking the continuity of language comprehension: Computer mouse trajectories suggest parallel syntactic processing. Cognitive Science, 31, 889–909.
Gilbert, D. T.(1991). How mental systems believe. American Psychologist, 46, 107–119.
Gilbert, D. T., Tafarodi, R. W., & Malone, P. S. (1993). You can't not believe everything you read. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 65, 221–233.
Gregg, A. P. (2007). When vying reveals lying: The timed antagonistic response alethiometer. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 621–647.
Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A., & Woolley, J. D. (1982). Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111, 228–238.
McKinstry, C., Dale, R., & Spivey, M. J. (2008). Action dynamics reveal parallel competition in decision making. Psychological Science, 19, 22–24.
Monrose, F., & Rubin, A. D. (2000). Keystroke dynamics as a biometric for authentication. Future Generation Computer Systems, 16, 351–359.
Sartori, G., Agosta, S., Zogmaister, C., Ferrara, S. D., & Castiello, U. (2008). How to accurately assess autobiographical events. Psychological Science, 19, 772–780.
Spence, S. A., Hunter, M. D., Farrow, T. F. D., Green, R. D., Leung, D. H., Hughes, C. J., & Venkatasubramanian, G. (2004). A cognitive neurobiological account of deception: Evidence from functional neuroimaging. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 359, 1755–1762.
Spivey, M. J., Grosjean, M., & Knoblich, G. (2005). Continuous attraction toward phonological competitors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 10393–10398.
Vendemia, J. M., & Buzan, R. F. (2004). Neuronal mechanisms of deception and response congruity in a visual two-stimulus paradigm involving autobiographical information. Psychophysiology, 40, 25–36.
Vrij, A. (2001). Detecting lies and deceit: The psychology of lying and the implications for professional practice. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley.
Walczyk, J. J., Mahoney, K. T., Doverspike, D., & Griffith-Ross, D. A. (2009). Cognitive lie detection: Response time and consistency of answers as cues to deception. Journal of Business & Psychology, 24, 33–49.
Walczyk, J. J., Schwartz, J. P., Clifton, R., Adams, B., Wei, M., & Zha, P. (2005). Lying person-to-person about life events: A cognitive framework for lie detection. Personnel Psychology, 58, 141–170.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by a National Science Foundation (NSF) Graduate Research Fellowship to the first author, by NSF Grant BCS-0720322, and by IES Grant R305a080589.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Duran, N.D., Dale, R. & McNamara, D.S. The action dynamics of overcoming the truth. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 17, 486–491 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.4.486
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.4.486