Abstract
When asked which of two digits is greater, participants respond more quickly if physical size corresponds to number magnitude, such as in 3 7, than when the two attributes contradict each other, such as in 3 7. This size congruence effect in comparative number judgments is a well-documented phenomenon. We extended existing findings by showing that this effect does not depend on physical size of the number alone but can be observed with number symmetry. In addition, we observed that symmetric numbers are judged as being smaller than asymmetric numbers, which renders an interpretation of the number symmetry congruence effect in terms of physical size implausible. We refer to the polarity correspondence principle (Proctor & Cho, 2006) to explain the present findings.
Article PDF
References
Banks, W. P., Fujii, M., & Kayra-Stuart, F. (1976). Semantic congruity effects in comparative judgments of magnitudes of digits. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 2, 435–447. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.2.3.435
Besner, D., & Coltheart, M. (1979). Ideographic and alphabetic processing in skilled reading of English. Neuropsychologia, 17, 467–472. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(79)90053-8
Brysbaert, M. (1995). Arabic number reading: On the nature of the numerical scale and the origin of phonological recoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 434–452. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.124.4.434
Cohen Kadosh, R., & Henik, A. (2006). A common representation for semantic and physical properties: A cognitive-anatomical approach. Experimental Psychology, 53, 87–94. doi:10.1027/1618-3169.53.2.87
Dehaene, S. (1997). The number sense: How the mind creates mathematics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 371–396. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.122.3.371
Fitousi, D., & Algom, D. (2006). Size congruity effects with two-digit numbers: Expanding the number line? Memory & Cognition, 34, 445–457.
Ganor-Stern, D., Tzelgov, J., & Ellenbogen, R. (2007). Automaticity and two-digit numbers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 33, 483–496. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.33.2.483
Henik, A., & Tzelgov, J. (1982). Is three greater than five: The relation between physical and semantic size in comparison tasks. Memory & Cognition, 10, 389–395.
Ito, Y., & Hatta, T. (2004). Spatial structure of quantitative representation of numbers: Evidence from the SNARC effect. Memory & Cognition, 32, 662–673.
Pansky, A., & Algom, D. (1999). Stroop and Garner effects in comparative judgment of numerals: The role of attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 39–58. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.25.1.39
Pinel, P., Piazza, M., Le Bihan, D., & Dehaene, S. (2004). Distributed and overlapping cerebral representations of number, size, and luminance during comparative judgments. Neuron, 41, 983–993. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(04)00107-2
Proctor, R. W., & Cho, Y. S. (2006). Polarity correspondence: A general principle for performance of speeded binary classification tasks. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 416–442. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.416
Reber, R., Zimmermann, T. D., & Wurtz, P. (2004). Judgments of duration, figure-ground contrast, and size for words and nonwords. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 1105–1114.
Rubinsten, O., & Henik, A. (2005). Automatic activation of internal magnitudes: A study of developmental dyscalculia. Neuropsychology, 19, 641–648. doi:10.1037/0894-4105.19.5.641
Schwarz, W., & Heinze, H.-J. (1998). On the interaction of numerical and size information in digit comparison: A behavioral and event- related potential study. Neuropsychologia, 36, 1167–1179. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00001-3
Schwarz, W., & Ischebeck, A. (2003). On the relative speed account of number-size interference in comparative judgments of numerals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 507–522. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.29.3.507
Verguts, T., & De Moor, W. (2005). Two-digit comparison: Decomposed, holistic, or hybrid? Experimental Psychology, 52, 195–200. doi:10.1027/1618-3169.52.3.195
Walsh, V. (2003). A theory of magnitude: Common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 483–488. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2003.09.002
Weale, R. A. (1975). Apparent size and contrast. Vision Research, 15, 949–955. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(75)90235-7
Weyl, H. (1952). Symmetry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was funded by the Norwegian Research Council, Grant 192415, to R.R. We thank Kenneth Hugdahl and Bjørn Sætrevik for comments on earlier versions of the manuscript.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reber, R., Wurtz, P., Knapstad, M. et al. Polarity correspondence in comparative number magnitude judgments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 17, 219–223 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.2.219
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.2.219