Abstract
The temporal stability of delay-discount rates for monetary rewards was assessed using a monetary choice questionnaire (Kirby & Marakovic, 1996). Of 100 undergraduate participants who completed the questionnaire at the initial session, 81 returned 5 weeks later and 46 returned 57 weeks later for subsequent sessions. The 5-week test—retest stability of discount rates was .77 (95% confidence interval 5 .67—.85), the 1-year stability was .71 (.50–.84), and the 57-week stability was .63 (.41—.77). Thus, at least when similar testing situations are reinstated, discount rates as individual differences have 1-year stabilities in the range that is typically obtained for personality traits. Discount rates index an attribute of the person that is relatively stable over time but that is moderated by aspects of the situation, such as reward type and deprivational state.
Article PDF
References
Acheson, A., Richards, J. B., & de Wit, H. (2007). Effects of sleep deprivation on impulsive behaviors in men and women. Physiology & Behavior, 91, 579–587.
Ainslie, G. (1975). Specious reward: A behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 463–496.
Baker, F., Johnson, M. W., & Bickel, W. K. (2003). Delay discounting in current and never-before cigarette smokers: Similarities and differences across commodity, sign, and magnitude. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 382–392.
Dittmar, H. (2001). Impulse buying in ordinary and “compulsive” consumers. In E. U. Weber, J. Baron, & G. Loomes (Eds.), Conflict and tradeoffs in decision making (pp. 110–135). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Duckworth, A. L., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents. Psychological Science, 16, 939–944.
Estes, W. K. (1997). On the communication of information by displays of standard errors and confidence intervals. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 330–341.
Field, M., Santarcangelo, M., Sumnall, H., Goudie, A., & Cole, J. (2006). Delay discounting and the behavioural economics of cigarette purchases in smokers: The effects of nicotine deprivation. Psychopharmacology, 186, 255–263.
Fleeson, W. (2007). Situation-based contingencies underlying trait-content manifestation in behavior. Journal of Personality, 75, 825–862.
Green, L., Fisher, E. B., Jr., Perlow, S., & Sherman, L. (1981). Preference reversal and self-control: Choice as a function of reward amount and delay. Behaviour Analysis Letters, 1, 43–51.
Green, L., & Myerson, J. (2004). A discounting framework for choice with delayed and probabilistic rewards. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 769–792.
Green, L., Myerson, J., Lichtman, D., Rosen, S., & Fry, A. (1996). Temporal discounting in choice between delayed rewards: The role of age and income. Psychology & Aging, 11, 79–84.
Green, L., Myerson, J., & Ostaszewski, P. (1999). Discounting of delayed rewards across the life span: Age differences in individual discounting functions. Behavioural Processes, 46, 89–96.
Johnson, M. W., Bickel, W. K., & Baker, F. (2007). Moderate drug use and delay discounting: A comparison of heavy, light, and never smokers. Experimental & Clinical Psychopharmacology, 15, 187–194.
Kirby, K. N., & Finch, J. (2008). The hierarchical structure of selfreported impulsivity in a college-age population. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Kirby, K. N., Godoy, R., Reyes-García, V., Byron, E., Apaza, L., Leonard, W., et al. (2002). Correlates of delay-discount rates: Evidence from Tsimane’ Amerindians of the Bolivian rain forest. Journal of Economic Psychology, 23, 291–316.
Kirby, K. N., & Marakovic, N. N. (1996). Delay-discounting probabilistic rewards: Rates decrease as amounts increase. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 100–104.
Kirby, K. N., & Petry, N. M. (2004). Heroin and cocaine abusers have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than alcoholics or non-drugusing controls. Addiction, 99, 461–471.
Kirby, K. N., Petry, N. M., & Bickel, W. K. (1999). Heroin addicts have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than non-drug-using controls. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 78–87.
Kirby, K. N., Winston, G. C., & Santiesteban, M. (2005). Impatience and grades: Delay-discount rates correlate negatively with college GPA. Learning & Individual Differences, 15, 213–222.
Mazur, J. E. (1987). An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. In M. L. Commons, J. E. Mazur, J. A. Nevin, & H. Rachlin (Eds.), Quantitative analyses of behavior: The effect of delay and of intervening events on reinforcement value (Vol. 5, pp. 55–73). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ohmura, Y., Takahashi, T., Kitamura, N., & Wehr, P. (2006). Threemonth stability of delay and probability discounting measures. Experimental & Clinical Psychopharmacology, 14, 318–328.
Petry, N. M. (2001). Pathological gamblers, with and without substance abuse disorders, discount delayed rewards at high rates. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110, 482–487.
Rachlin, H. (2000). The science of self-control. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Remmers, H. H. (1963). Rating methods in research on teaching. In N. L. Gage (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Schuerger, J. M., Tait, E., & Tavernelli, M. (1982). Temporal stability of personality by questionnaire. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 43, 176–182.
Simpson, C. A., & Vuchinich, R. E. (2000). Reliability of a measure of temporal discounting. Psychological Record, 50, 3–16.
Steiger, J. H., & Fouladi, R. T. (1992). R2: A computer program for interval estimation, power calculation, and hypothesis testing for the squared multiple correlation. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 4, 581–582.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was funded by NIH Grant MH55262, and preparation of the manuscript was supported in part by NSF Grant SES-0617868.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kirby, K.N. One-year temporal stability of delay-discount rates. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 16, 457–462 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.3.457
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.3.457