Abstract
Because the objects that surround us are three-dimensional, their appearance and our visual perception of them change depending on an object’s orientation relative to a viewpoint. One of the most remarkable effects of object orientation is that viewers prefer three-quarter views over others, such as front and back, but the exact source of this preference has not been firmly established. We show that object orientation perception of the threequarter view is relatively imprecise and that this impreciseness is related to preference for this view. Human vision is largely insensitive to variations among different three-quarter views (e.g., 45° vs. 50°); therefore, the three-quarter view is perceived as if it corresponds to a wide range of orientations. In other words, it functions as the typical representation of the object.
Article PDF
References
Bar, M., & Neta, M. (2007). Visual elements of subjective preference modulate amygdala activation. Neuropsychologia, 45, 2191–2200.
Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115–147.
Biederman, I. (2001). Recognizing depth-rotated objects: A review of recent research and theory. Spatial Vision, 13, 241–253.
Biederman, I., & Bar, M. (1999). One-shot viewpoint invariance in matching novel objects. Vision Research, 39, 2885–2899.
Blanz, V., Tarr, M. J., & Bülthoff, H. H. (1999). What object attributes determine canonical views? Perception, 28, 575–599.
Bornstein, R. F. (1989). Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 265–289.
Grammer, K., & Thornhill, R. (1994). Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: The role of symmetry and averageness. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 108, 233–242.
Humphrey, G. K., & Jolicoeur, P. (1993). An examination of the effects of axis foreshortening, monocular depth cues, and visual field on object identification. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46A, 137–159.
Lawson, R., & Humphreys, G. W. (1999). The effects of view in depth on the identification of line drawings and silhouettes of familiar objects: Normality and pathology. Visual Cognition, 6, 165–195.
Lawson, R., Humphreys, G. W., & Jolicœur, P. (2000). Combined effects of plane disorientation and foreshortening on picture naming: One manipulation or two? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 568–581.
Marr, D. (1982). Vision. San Francisco: Freeman.
Mitsumatsu, H., & Yokosawa, K. (2002). How do the internal details of the object contribute to recognition? Perception, 31, 1289–1298.
Møller, A. P. (1992). Female swallow preference for symmetrical male sexual ornaments. Nature, 357, 238–240.
Newell, F. N., & Findlay, J. M. (1997). The effect of depth rotation on object identification. Perception, 26, 1231–1257.
Niimi, R., & Yokosawa, K. (2008). Determining the orientation of depth-rotated familiar objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 208–214.
Palmer, S. (1999). Vision science: Photons to phenomenology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Palmer, S., Rosch, E., & Chase, P. (1981). Canonical perspective and the perception of objects. In J. [B.] Long & A. [D.] Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance IX (pp. 135–151). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Sebrechts, M. M., & Garner, W. R. (1981). Stimulus-specific consequences of pattern goodness. Memory & Cognition, 9, 41–49.
Senior, C. (2003). Beauty in the brain of the beholder. Neuron, 38, 525–528.
Tarr, M. J. (1995). Rotating objects to recognize them: A case study on the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of threedimensional objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 55–82.
Verfaillie, K., & Boutsen, L. (1995). A corpus of 714 full-color images of depth-rotated objects. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 925–961.
Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology Monographs, 9, 1–27.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This study was supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (awarded to both R.N. and K.Y.).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Niimi, R., Yokosawa, K. Three-quarter views are subjectively good because object orientation is uncertain. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 16, 289–294 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.2.289
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.2.289