Abstract
The hypercorrection effect is the finding that high-confidence errors are more likely to be corrected after feedback than are low-confidence errors (Butterfield & Metcalfe, 2001). In two experiments, we explored the idea that the hypercorrection effect results from increased attention to surprising feedback. In Experiment 1, participants were more likely to remember the appearance of the presented feedback when the feedback did not match expectations. In Experiment 2, we replicated this effect using more distinctive sources and also demonstrated the hypercorrection effect in this modified paradigm. Overall, participants better remembered both the surface features and the content of surprising feedback.
Article PDF
References
Brewer, W. F., Sampaio, C., & Barlow, M. R. (2005). Confidence and accuracy in the recall of deceptive and nondeceptive sentences. Journal of Memory & Language, 52, 618–627.
Butterfield, B. A. (2005). The hypercorrection effect and its neural correlates. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 66, 2846.
Butterfield, B. [A.], & Mangels, J. A. (2003). Neural correlates of error detection and correction in a semantic retrieval task. Cognitive Brain Research, 17, 793–817.
Butterfield, B. [A.], & Metcalfe, J. (2001). Errors committed with high confidence are hypercorrected. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 1491–1494.
Butterfield, B. [A.], & Metcalfe, J. (2006). The correction of errors committed with high confidence. Metacognition & Learning, 1, 69–84.
Doerksen, S., & Shimamura, A. P. (2001). Source memory enhancement for emotional words. Emotion, 1, 5–11.
Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3–28.
Kulhavy, R. W. (1977). Feedback in written instruction. Review of Educational Research, 47, 211–232.
Kulhavy, R. W., Yekovich, F. R., & Dyer, J. W. (1976). Feedback and response confidence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 522–528.
MacKay, D. G., & Ahmetzanov, M. V. (2005). Emotion, memory, and attention in the taboo Stroop paradigm: An experimental analogue of flashbulb memories. Psychological Science, 16, 25–32.
McGeoch, J. A. (1942). The psychology of human learning, an introduction. New York: Longmans, Green.
Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1980). Norms of 300 general-information questions: Accuracy of recall, latency of recall, and feeling-of-knowing ratings. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 19, 338–368.
Perfect, T. J., Watson, E. L., & Wagstaff, G. F. (1993). Accuracy of confidence ratings associated with general knowledge and eyewitness memory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 144–147.
Raaijmakers, J. G., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1981). Search of associative memory. Psychological Review, 88, 93–134.
Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64–99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported by a collaborative activity award from the James S. McDonnell Foundation.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fazio, L.K., Marsh, E.J. Surprising feedback improves later memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 16, 88–92 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.1.88
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.1.88