Abstract
Studies of deception detection traditionally have focused on verbal communication. Nevertheless, people commonly deceive others through nonverbal cues. Previous research has shown that intentions can be inferred from the ways in which people move their bodies. Furthermore, motor expertise within a given domain has been shown to increase visual sensitivity to other people’s movements within that domain. Does expertise also enhance deception detection from bodily movement? In two psychophysical studies, experienced basketball players and novices attempted to distinguish deceptive intentions (fake passes) and veridical intentions (true passes) from an observed individual’s actions. Whereas experts and novices performed similarly with postural cues, only experts could detect deception from kinematics alone. These results demonstrate a link between action expertise and the detection of nonverbal deception.
Article PDF
References
Abernethy, B. (1989). Expert-novice differences in perception: How expert does the expert have to be? Canadian Journal of Sport Sciences, 14, 27–30.
Abernethy, B., & Zawi, K. (2007). Pickup of essential kinematics underpins expert perception of movement patterns. Journal of Motor Behavior, 39, 353–367.
Behrmann, M., & Ewell, C. (2003). Expertise in tactile pattern recognition. Psychological Science, 14, 480–486.
Blakemore, S.-J., & Frith, C. (2005). The role of motor contagion in the prediction of action. Neuropsychologia, 43, 260–267.
Bond, C. F., Jr., & DePaulo, B. M. (2006). Accuracy of deception judgments. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 10, 214–234.
Bosbach, S., Cole, J., Prinz, W., & Knoblich, G. (2005). Inferring another’s expectation from action: The role of peripheral sensation. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1295–1297.
Buccino, G., Vogt, S., Ritzl, A., Fink, G. R., Zilles, K., Freund, H.-J., & Rizzolatti, G. (2004). Neural circuits underlying imitation learning of hand actions: An event-related fMRI study. Neuron, 42, 323–334.
Calvo-Merino, B., Glaser, D. E., Grèzes, J., Passingham, R. E., & Haggard, P. (2005). Action observation and acquired motor skills: An fMRI study with expert dancers. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 1243–1249.
Calvo-Merino, B., Grèzes, J., Glaser, D. E., Passingham, R. E., & Haggard, P. (2006). Seeing or doing? Influence of visual and motor familiarity in action observation. Current Biology, 16, 1905–1910.
Canal-Bruland, R., & Schmidt, M. (2008). The role of motor and perceptual expertise in the prediction of deceptive movements. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Chouchourelou, A., Matsuka, T., Harber, K., & Shiffrar, M. (2006). The visual analysis of emotional action. Social Neuroscience, 1, 63–74.
Cross, E. S., Hamilton, A. F. de C., & Grafton, S. T. (2006). Building a motor simulation de novo: Observation of dance by dancers. NeuroImage, 31, 1257–1267.
Cutting, J. E., & Koslowski, L. T. (1977). Recognizing friends by their walk: Gait perception without familiarity cues. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 9, 353–356.
Dittrich, W. H., Troscianko, T., Lea, S. E. G., & Morgan, D. (1996). Perception of emotion from dynamic point-light displays represented in dance. Perception, 25, 727–738.
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1969). Nonverbal leakage and clues to deception. Psychiatry: Journal for the Study of Interpersonal Processes, 32, 88–106.
Farrow, D., & Abernethy, B. (2003). Do expertise and the degree of perception-action coupling affect natural anticipatory performance? Perception, 32, 1127–1139.
Frith, C. D., & Frith, U. (2006). How we predict what other people are going to do. Brain Research, 1079, 36–46.
Grèzes, J., Frith, C. D., & Passingham, R. E. (2004a). Brain mechanisms for inferring deceit in the actions of others. Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 5500–5505.
Grèzes, J., Frith, C. D., & Passingham, R. E. (2004b). Inferring false beliefs from the actions of oneself and others: An fMRI study. NeuroImage, 21, 744–750.
Heberlein, A. S., Adolphs, R., Tranel, D., & Damasio, H. (2004). Cortical regions for judgments of emotions and personality traits from pointlight walkers. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 1143–1158.
Jackson, R. C., Warren, S., & Abernethy, B. (2006). Anticipation skill and susceptibility to deceptive movement. Acta Psychologica, 123, 355–371.
Jacobs, A., Pinto, J., & Shiffrar, M. (2004). Experience, context, and the visual perception of human movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 30, 822–835.
Johansson, G. (1973). Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception & Psychophysics, 14, 201–211.
Knoblich, G. (2008). Bodily and motor contributions to action perception. In R. Klatzky, B. MacWhinney, & M. Behrmann (Eds.), Embodiment, ego-space, and action (pp. 45–78). New York: Psychology Press.
Knoblich, G., & Flach, R. (2001). Predicting the effects of actions: Interactions of perception and action. Psychological Science, 12, 467–472.
Loula, F., Prasad, S., Harber, K., & Shiffrar, M. (2005). Recognizing people from their movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 31, 210–220.
Müller, S., Abernethy, B., & Farrow, D. (2006). How do worldclass cricket batsmen anticipate a bowler’s intention? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 2162–2186.
Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169–192.
Runeson, S., & Frykholm, G. (1983). Kinematic specification of dynamics as an informational basis for person-and-action perception: Expectation, gender recognition, and deceptive intention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112, 585–615.
Southgate, V., Senju, A., & Csibra, G. (2007). Action anticipation through attribution of false belief by 2-year-olds. Psychological Science, 18, 587–592.
Troje, N. F., & Bülthoff, H. H. (1996). Face recognition under varying poses: The role of texture and shape. Vision Research, 36, 1761–1771.
Troje, N. F., Westhoff, C., & Lavrov, M. (2005). Person identification from biological motion: Effects of structural and kinematic cues. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 667–675.
Vrij, A. (2004). Why professionals fail to catch liars and how they can improve. Legal & Criminological Psychology, 9, 159–181.
Vrij, A. (2006). Nonverbal communication and deception. In V. Manusov & M. L. Patterson (Eds.), The Sage handbook of nonverbal communication (pp. 341–359). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Wilson, M., & Knoblich, G. (2005). The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 460–473.
Wolpert, D. M., Doya, K., & Kawato, M. (2003). A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 358, 593–602.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by NEI Grant EY12300 and NSF Grant EXP-SA 0730985.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sebanz, N., Shiffrar, M. Detecting deception in a bluffing body: The role of expertise. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 16, 170–175 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.1.170
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.1.170