Skip to main content
Log in

Relative fluency and illusions of recognition memory

  • Brief Reports
  • Published:
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A hallmark of the experience of perceptual fluency is the sense that a familiar stimulus seems to pop out from its background, such as when one notices the face of a friend in a crowd of strangers. This experience suggests that fluency-based illusions of recognition memory may be more powerful when there are only a few fluent stimuli presented in a recognition context. The results of the present study were consistent with this prediction. The magnitude of fluency-based illusions of recognition memory was inversely related to the percentage of fluent stimuli on a recognition test. Furthermore, standard fluency manipulations did not impact recognition responses in between-participants designs. The results suggest that illusions of recognition memory may be more powerful when fluency is encountered in a context in which the surrounding stimuli are less fluent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bodner, G. E., & Masson, M. E. J. (2001). Prime validity affects masked repetition priming: Evidence for an episodic resource account of priming. Journal of Memory & Language, 45, 616–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodner, G. E., & Masson, M. E. J. (2004). Beyond binary judgments: Prime validity modulates masked repetition priming in the naming task. Memory & Cognition, 32, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. S. (2003). A review of the déjà vu experience. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 394–413.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Forster, K. I., Mohan, K., & Hector, J. (2003). The mechanics of masked priming. In S. Kinoshita & S. J. Lupker (Eds.), Masked priming: The state of the art. Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gellatly, A., Banton, P., & Woods, C. (1995). Salience and awareness in the Jacoby-Whitehouse effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 1374–1379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldinger, S. D., Kleider, H. M., & Shelley, E. (1999). The marriage of perception and memory: Creating two-way illusions with words and voices. Memory & Cognition, 27, 328–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, L. L., & Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 306–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, L. L., & Whitehouse, K. (1989). An illusion of memory: False recognition influenced by unconscious perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 126–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurilla, B. P., & Westerman, D. L. (2008). Processing fluency affects subjective claims for recollection. Memory & Cognition, 36, 82–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masson, M. E. J., & Caldwell, J. I. (1998). Conceptually driven encoding episodes create perceptual misattributions. Acta Psychologica, 98, 183–210.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 16, 519–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murrell, G. A., & Morton, J. (1974). Word recognition and morphemic structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102, 963–968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reber, R., Zimmermann, T. D., & Wurtz, P. (2004). Judgments of duration, figure-ground contrast, and size for words and nonwords. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 1105–1114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snodgrass, J. G., & Corwin, J. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 34–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westerman, D. L., Lloyd, M. E., & Miller, J. K. (2002). The attribution of fluency in recognition memory: The role of expectation. Journal of Memory & Language, 47, 607–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Leboe, J. P. (2003). Two fluency heuristics (and how to tell them apart). Journal of Memory & Language, 49, 62–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Williams, L. D. (1998). Why do strangers feel familiar, but friends don’t? Acta Psychologica, 98, 141–165.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Williams, L. D. (2001a). The discrepancy attribution hypothesis: I. The heuristic basis of feelings and familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Williams, L. D. (2001b). The discrepancy attribution hypothesis: II. Expectation, uncertainty, surprise, and feelings of familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 14–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M. (1988). MRC Psycholinguistic Database: Machine-usable dictionary, version 2.00. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 20, 6–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witherspoon, D., & Allan, L. G. (1985). The effect of a prior presentation on temporal judgments in a perceptual identification task. Memory & Cognition, 13, 101–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yonelinas, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory & Language, 46, 441–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deanne L. Westerman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Westerman, D.L. Relative fluency and illusions of recognition memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 15, 1196–1200 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.6.1196

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.6.1196

Keywords

Navigation