Skip to main content
Log in

Reaching while walking: Reaching distance costs more than walking distance

  • Brief Reports
  • Published:
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Surprisingly little is known about how people plan and control everyday physical actions, such as walking along and picking up objects. In order to explore this topic, we conducted an experiment in which university students were asked to pick up a common object (a child’s beach bucket) that stood on a table several meters from the participant’s start position. The bucket stood either on the left side, in the middle, or on the right side of the table and, depending on instructions, was to be carried to a farther target whose horizontal position was also varied. The questions were which side of the table the participant would walk along when picking up the bucket and which hand the participant would use to pick up and carry the bucket. Participants, most of whom were righthanded, preferred to walk along the left side of the table and to pick up the bucket with the right hand, although they departed from that preference when the reaching distance across the table was uncomfortable or if the target was too far to the right. The data were well fit with a mathematical model that included a right-hand bias and an estimate of functional distance that expressed the cost of reaching over some distance as approximately twice the cost of walking over the same distance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Bryden, P. J., & Roy, E. A. (2006). Preferential reaching across regions of hemispace in adults and children. Developmental Psychobiology, 48, 121–136.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carnahan, H., McFadyen, B. J., Cockell, D. L., & Halverson, A. H. (1996). The combined control of locomotion and prehension. Neuroscience Research Communications, 19, 91–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claxton, L. J., Keen, R., & McCarty, M. E. (2003). Evidence of motor planning in infant reaching behavior. Psychological Science, 14, 354–356.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cockell, D. L., Carnahan, H., & McFadyen, B. J. (1995). A preliminary analysis of the coordination of reaching, grasping, and walking. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 81, 515–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. G., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2004). Where objects are grasped reveals how grasps are planned: Generation and recall of motor plans. Experimental Brain Research, 157, 486–495.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Doyen, A.-L., & Carlier, M. (2002). Measuring handedness: A validation study of Bishop’s reaching card test. Laterality, 7, 115–130.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Georgopoulos, A. P., & Grillner, S. (1989). Visuomotor coordination in reaching and locomotion. Science, 245, 1209–1210.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodnow, J. J., & Levine, R. A. (1973). “The grammar of action”: Sequence and syntax in children’s copying. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 82–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haggard, P. (1998). Planning of action sequences. Acta Psychologica, 99, 201–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marteniuk, R. G., & Bertram, C. P. (2001). Contributions of gait and trunk movement to prehension: Perspectives from world- and bodycentered coordinates. Motor Control, 5, 151–164.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marteniuk, R. G., Leavitt, J. L., MacKenzie, C. L., & Athenes, S. (1990). Functional relationships between grasp and transport components in a prehension task. Human Movement Science, 9, 149–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97–113.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, D. A., Cohen, R. G., Meulenbroek, R. G., & Vaughan, J. (2006). Plans for grasping objects. In M. Latash & F. Lestienne (Eds.), Motor control and learning over the lifespan (pp. 9–25). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, D. A., Halloran, E. S., & Cohen, R. G. (2006). Grasping movement plans. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 918–922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todorov, E. (2004). Optimality principles in sensorimotor control. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 907–915.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • van der Wel, R. P., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2007). Coordination of locomotion and prehension. Experimental Brain Research, 176, 281–287.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weigelt, M., Cohen, R. G., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2007). Returning home: Locations rather than movements are recalled in human object manipulation. Experimental Brain Research, 149, 191–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weir, P. L., MacDonald, J. R., Mallat, B. J., Leavitt, J. L., & Roy, E. A. (1998). Age-related differences in prehension: The influence of task goals. Journal of Motor Behavior, 30, 79–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David A. Rosenbaum.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rosenbaum, D.A. Reaching while walking: Reaching distance costs more than walking distance. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 15, 1100–1104 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.6.1100

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.6.1100

Keywords

Navigation