Skip to main content
Log in

Semantic processing in “associative” false memory

  • Theoretical and Review Articles
  • Published:
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We studied the semantic properties of a class of illusions, of which the Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm is the most prominent example, in which subjects falsely remember words that are associates of studied words. We analyzed DRM materials for 16 dimensions of semantic content and assessed the ability of these dimensions to predict interlist variability in false memory. For the more general class of illusions, we analyzed pairs of presented and unpresented words that varied in associative strength for the presence of these same 16 semantic properties. DRM materials proved to be exceptionally rich in meaning, as indexed by these semantic properties. Variability in false recall, false recognition, and backward associative strength loaded on a single semantic factor (familiarity/meaningfulness), whereas variability in true recall loaded on a quite different factor (imagery/concreteness). For word association generally, 15 semantic properties varied reliably with forward or backward association between words. Implications for semantic versus associative processing in this class of illusions, for dual-process theories, and for semantic properties of word associations are discussed. nt]mis|The present article was supported, in part, by grants from the National Institutes of Health (MH-061211) and the National Science Foundation (BCS 0553225) to C.J.B. and V.F.R., a grant from the National Cancer Institute (R13CA126359) to V.F.R., and a grant from the Economic and Social Research Council U.K. (RES-062-23-0452) to M.L.H.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anisfeld, M., & Knapp, M. (1968). Association, synonymity, and directionality in false recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 171–179.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, P., Berry, G., & Matthews, J. N. S. (2002). Statistical methods in medical research (4th ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barnhardt, T. M., Choi, H., Gerkens, D. R., & Smith, S. M. (2006). Output position and word relatedness effects in a DRM paradigm: Support for a dual-retrieval process theory of free recall and false memories. Journal of Memory & Language, 55, 213–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjorklund, D. F., & Muir, J. E. (1988). Children’s development of free recall memory: Remembering on their own. Annals of Child Development, 5, 79–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1999). Affective norms for English words (ANEW): Instruction manual and affective ratings (Tech. Rep. C-1). Gainesville, FL: University of Florida, Center for Research in Psychophysiology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brainerd, C. J., Forrest, T. J., Karibian, D., & Reyna, V. F. (2006). Development of the false-memory illusion. Developmental Psychology, 42, 962–979.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brainerd, C. J., Payne, D. G., Wright, R., & Reyna, V. F. (2003). Phantom recall. Journal of Memory & Language, 48, 445–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brainerd, C. J., & Reyna, V. F. (2005). The science of false memory. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brainerd, C. J., Reyna, V. F., & Ceci, S. J. (2008). Developmental reversals in false memory: A review of data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 343–382.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brainerd, C. J., Reyna, V. F., & Mojardin, A. H. (1999). Conjoint recognition. Psychological Review, 106, 160–179.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brainerd, C. J., Reyna, V. F., Wright, R., & Mojardin, A. H. (2003). Recollection rejection: False-memory editing in children and adults. Psychological Review, 110, 762–784.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brainerd, C. J., & Wright, R. (2005). Forward associative strength, backward associative strength, and the false memory illusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31, 554–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brainerd, C. J., Wright, R., Reyna, V. F., & Payne, D. G. (2002). Dual-retrieval processes in free and associative recall. Journal of Memory & Language, 46, 120–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budson, A. E., Todman, R. W., Chong, H., Adams, E. H., Kensinger, E. A., Krangel, T. S., & Wright, C. I. (2006). False recognition of emotional word lists in aging and Alzheimer disease. Cognitive & Behavioral Neurology, 19, 71–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cann, D. R., McRae, K., & Katz, A. N. (2006, November). Knowledge types underlying false recall in the Deese/Roediger-McDermott paradigm. Paper presented at the 47th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Houston.

  • Carneiro, P., Fernandez, A., & Dias, A. R. (2008). The influence of theme identifiability on false memories: Evidence for age-dependent opposite effects. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Corson, Y., & Verrier, N. (2007). Emotion and false memories: Valence or arousal? Psychological Science, 18, 208–211.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cotel, S. C., Gallo, D. A., & Seamon, J. G. (2008). Nonconscious activation causes false memories: Experimental control of conscious processes in the Deese, Roediger, and McDermott task. Consciousness & Cognition, 17, 210–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 11, 671–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dannenbring, G. L., & Briand, K. (1982). Semantic priming and the word repetition effect in a lexical decision task. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 36, 435–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deese, J. (1959). On the prediction of occurrence of certain verbal intrusions in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 17–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dewhurst, S. A. (2001). Category repetition and false recognition: Effects of instance frequency and category size. Journal of Memory & Language, 44, 153–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fillenbaum, S. (1969). Words as feature complexes: False recognition of antonyms and synonyms. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 82, 400–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freyd, J. J., & Gleaves, D. H. (1996). “Remembering” words not presented in lists: Relevance to the current recovered/false memory controversy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 811–813.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallo, D. A. (2006). Associative illusions of memory: False memory research in DRM and related tasks. New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallo, D. A., Roberts, M. J., & Seamon, J. G. (1997). Remembering words not presented in lists: Can we avoid creating false memories? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 271–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallo, D. A., & Roediger, H. L., III (2002). Variability among word lists in eliciting memory illusions: Evidence for associative activation and monitoring. Journal of Memory & Language, 47, 469–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillund, G., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. Psychological Review, 91, 1–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, L., & Eagle, M. (1970). Synonymity, antonymity, and association in false recognition responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83, 244–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunter, R. W., Ivanko, S. L., & Bodner, G. E. (2005). Can test list context manipulations improve recognition accuracy in the DRM paradigm? Memory, 13, 862–873.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holliday, R. E., & Hayes, B. K. (2000). Dissociating automatic and intentional processes in children’s eyewitness memory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 75, 1–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holliday, R. E., & Hayes, B. K. (2001). Automatic and intentional processes in children’s eyewitness suggestibility. Cognitive Development, 16, 617–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holliday, R. E., & Hayes, B. K. (2002). Automatic and intentional processes in children’s recognition memory: The reversed misinformation effect. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holliday, R. E., & Weekes, B. S. (2006). Dissociated developmental trajectories for semantic and phonological false memories. Memory, 14, 624–636.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hovland, C. I. (1951). Human learning and retention. In S. S. Stevens (Ed.), Handbook of experimental psychology (pp. 613–689). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, M. L. (2006). Developmentally invariant dissociations in children’s true and false memories: Not all relatedness is created equal. Child Development, 77, 1112–1123.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Howe, M. L. (2007). Children’s emotional false memories. Psychological Science, 18, 856–860.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Howe, M. L. (2008a). Visual distinctiveness and the development of children’s false memories. Child Development, 79, 65–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Howe, M. L. (2008b). What is false memory development the development of ? Comment on Brainerd, Reyna, and Ceci (2008). Psychological Bulletin, 134, 768–772.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison, K. A., & Balota, D. A. (2005). Decoupling semantic and associative information in false memories: Explorations with semantically ambiguous and unambiguous critical lures. Journal of Memory & Language, 52, 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joordens, S., & Besner, D. (1992). Priming effects that span an intervening unrelated word: Implications for models of memory representation and retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 18, 483–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kensinger, E. A. (2004). Remembering emotional experiences: The contribution of valence and arousal. Reviews in the Neurosciences, 15, 241–251.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kintsch, W., Welsch, D., Schmalhofer, F., & Zimny, S. (1990). Sentence memory: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Memory & Language, 29, 133–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lampinen, J. M., Copeland, S. M., & Neuschatz, J. S. (2001). Recollections of things schematic: Room schemas revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 1211–1222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampinen, J. M., Leding, J. K., Reed, K. B., & Odegard, T. N. (2006). Global gist extraction in children and adults. Memory, 14, 952–964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Libby, L. K., & Neisser, U. (2001). Structure and strategy in the associative false memory paradigm. Memory, 9, 145–163.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mandler, G. (1962). From association to structure. Psychological Review, 69, 425–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masson, M. E. J. (1991). A distributed memory model of context effects in word identification. In D. Besner & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 233–263). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEvoy, C. L., Nelson, D. L., & Komatsu, T. (1999). What is the connection between true and false memories? The differential roles of interitem associations in recall and recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 25, 1177–1194.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKone, E. (2004). Distinguishing true from false memories via lexical decision as a perceptual implicit test. Australian Journal of Psychology, 56, 42–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. A. (1999). The University of South Florida word association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Unpublished manuscript, University of South Florida, Tampa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuschatz, J. S., Benoit, G. E., & Payne, D. G. (2003). Effective warnings in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott false-memory paradigm: The role of identifiability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 35–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odegard, T. N., Holliday, R. E., Brainerd, C. J., & Reyna, V. F. (2008). Attention to global gist processing eliminates age effects in false memories. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 99, 96–113.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papke, L. E., & Wooldridge, J. (1996). Econometric methods for fractional response variables with an application to 401(k) plan participation rates. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11, 619–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, D. G., Elie, C. J., Blackwell, J. M., & Neuschatz, J. S. (1996). Memory illusions: Recalling, recognizing, and recollecting events that never occurred. Journal of Memory & Language, 35, 261–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pezdek, K., Finger, K., & Hodge, D. (1997). Planting false childhood memories: The role of event plausibility. Psychological Science, 8, 437–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, M. B., Roberts, K. P., Ceci, S. J., & Hembrooke, H. (1999). The effects of repeated exposure on children’s suggestibility. Developmental Psychology, 35, 1462–1477.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reyna, V. F., & Brainerd, C. J. (1995). Fuzzy-trace theory: An interim synthesis. Learning & Individual Differences, 7, 1–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reyna, V. F., & Kiernan, B. (1994). The development of gist versus verbatim memory in sentence recognition: Effects of lexical familiarity, semantic content, encoding instructions, and retention interval. Developmental Psychology, 30, 178–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reyna, V. F., & Kiernan, B. (1995). Children’s memory and interpretation of psychological metaphors. Metaphor & Symbolic Activity, 10, 309–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivers, S. E., Reyna, V. F., & Mills, B. (2008). Risk taking under the influence: A fuzzy-trace theory of emotion in adolescence. Developmental Review, 28, 107–144.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Roediger, H. L., III, & McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented on lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 803–814.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roediger, H. L., III, Watson, J. M., McDermott, K. B., & Gallo, D. A. (2001). Factors that determine false recall: A multiple regression analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 385–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, W. A., & Jenkins, J. J. (1954). The complete Minnesota norms for responses to 100 words from the Kent-Rosanoff word association test (Tech. Rep. No. 11, Contract N8 ONR 66216, Office of Naval Research). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seamon, J. G., Luo, C. R., Kopecky, J. J., Price, C. A., Rothschild, L., Fung, N. S., & Schwartz, M. A. (2002). Are false memories more difficult to forget than accurate memories? The effect of retention interval on recall and recognition. Memory & Cognition, 30, 1054–1064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seamon, J. G., Luo, C. R., Schwartz, M. A., Jones, K. J., Lee, D. M., & Jones, S. J. (2002). Repetition can have similar or different effects on accurate and false recognition. Journal of Memory & Language, 46, 323–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. East Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sommers, M. S., & Lewis, B. P. (1999). Who really lives next door: Creating false memories with phonological neighbors. Journal of Memory & Language, 40, 83–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stadler, M. A., Roediger, H. L., III, & McDermott, K. B. (1999). Norms for word lists that create false memories. Memory & Cognition, 27, 494–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, C., & Klauer, K. C. (2008). A simplified conjoint recognition paradigm for the measurement of gist and verbatim memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 34, 570–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starns, J. J., & Hicks, J. L. (2005). Source dimensions are retrieved independently in multidimensional monitoring tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31, 1213–1220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storbeck, J., & Clore, G. L. (2005). With sadness comes accuracy; with happiness, false memory: Mood and the false memory effect. Psychological Science, 16, 785–791.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson-Schill, S. L., Kurtz, K. J., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (1998). Effects of semantic and associative relatedness on automatic priming. Journal of Memory & Language, 38, 440–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toglia, M. P., & Battig, W. F. (1978). Handbook of semantic word norms. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toglia, M. P., Neuschatz, J. S., & Goodwin, K. A. (1999). Recall accuracy and illusory memories: When more is less. Memory, 7, 233–256.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tse, C.-S., & Neely, J. H. (2005). Assessing activation without source monitoring in the DRM false memory paradigm. Journal of Memory & Language, 53, 532–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tussing, A. A., & Greene, R. L. (1999). Differential effects of repetition on true and false recognition. Journal of Memory & Language, 40, 520–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, B. J. (1965). False recognition produced by implicit verbal responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 122–129.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, G. L., Small, M., Penrod, S., Malpass, R. S., Fulero, S. M., & Brimacombe, C. A. E. (1998). Eyewitness identification procedures: Recommendations for lineups and photospreads. Law & Human Behavior, 23, 603–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, M. J., & Townsend, J. T. (2006). On the costs and benefits of faces and words: Process characteristics of feature search in highly meaningful stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 32, 755–779.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, L. L., & Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounding concepts in perceptual simulation: I. Evidence from feature generation. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Yonelinas, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory & Language, 46, 441–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeelenberg, R., & Pecher, D. (2002). False memories and lexical de cision: Even twelve primes do not cause long-term semantic priming. Acta Psychologica, 109, 269–284.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. J. Brainerd.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brainerd, C.J., Yang, Y., Reyna, V.F. et al. Semantic processing in “associative” false memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 15, 1035–1053 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.6.1035

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.6.1035

Keywords

Navigation