Skip to main content
Log in

Distortions in location memory

  • Brief Reports
  • Published:
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Memory for the location of a briefly presented target is often distorted in systematic ways. When people remember dot locations within a circular space, they typically show memory biases that appear to reflect a categorical strategy. However, memory for a target location can also be biased toward visible markers or landmarks. In the present study, we investigated the interaction of categorical and landmark effects by providing sectioning lines in a circular space. In the absence of lines, response biases showed categorical effects, whereas in the presence of lines, response biases suggested that participants used a landmark-based scheme. Possible relations between the strategies are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Appelle, S. (1972). Perception and discrimination as a function of stimulus orientation: The “oblique effect” in man and animals. Psychological Bulletin, 78, 266–278.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Belli, R. F. (1988). Color blend retrievals: Compromise memories or deliberate compromise responses? Memory & Cognition, 16, 314–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, D. J., & Subbiah, I. (1994). Subjective landmarks in perception and memory for spatial location. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 119–139.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, T. L. (1998). Some effects of representational friction, target size, and memory averaging on memory for vertically moving targets. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52, 44–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, T. L., & Ruppel, S. E. (2000). Spatial memory averaging, the landmark attraction effect, and representational gravity. Psychological Research, 64, 41–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huttenlocher, J., Hedges, L. V., Corrigan, B., & Crawford, L. E. (2004). Spatial categories and the estimation of location. Cognition, 93, 75–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huttenlocher, J., Hedges, L. V., & Duncan, S. (1991). Categories and particulars: Prototype effects in estimating spatial location. Psychological Review, 98, 352–376.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neuberg, S. L., & Fiske, S. T. (1987). Motivational influences on impression formation: Outcome dependency, accuracy-driven attention, and individuating processes. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 53, 431–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, T., Werner, S., & Diedrichsen, J. (2003). Spatial distortions induced by multiple visual landmarks: How local distortions combine to produce complex distortion patterns. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 861–873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheth, B. R., & Shimojo, S. (2001). Compression of space in visual memory. Vision Research, 41, 329–341.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, B., & Schiano, D. J. (1989). Perceptual and conceptual factors in distortions in memory for graphs and maps. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 387–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcia Spetch.

Additional information

This research was supported by an NSERC research grant to M.S.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Verbeek, E., Spetch, M. Distortions in location memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 15, 328–336 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.2.328

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.2.328

Keywords

Navigation