Skip to main content
Log in

Spatial memories of virtual environments: How egocentric experience, intrinsic structure, and extrinsic structure interact

  • Brief Reports
  • Published:
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous research has uncovered three primary cues that influence spatial memory organization: egocentric experience, intrinsic structure (object defined), and extrinsic structure (environment defined). In the present experiments, we assessed the relative importance of these cues when all three were available during learning. Participants learned layouts from two perspectives in immersive virtual reality. In Experiment 1, axes defined by intrinsic and extrinsic structures were in conflict, and learning occurred from two perspectives, each aligned with either the intrinsic or the extrinsic structure. Spatial memories were organized around a reference direction selected from the first perspective, regardless of its alignment with intrinsic or extrinsic structures. In Experiment 2, axes defined by intrinsic and extrinsic structures were congruent, and spatial memories were organized around reference axes defined by those congruent structures, rather than by the initially experienced view. The findings are discussed in the context of spatial memory theory as it relates to real and virtual environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Avraamides, M. N., & Kelly, J. W. (2005). Imagined perspective-changing within and across novel environments. In C. Freksa, B. Nebel, M. Knauff, & B. Krieg-Brückner (Eds.), Lecture notes in artificial intelligence: Spatial cognition IV (pp. 245–258). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diwadkar, V. A., & McNamara, T. P. (1997). Viewpoint dependence in scene recognition. Psychological Science, 8, 302–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J. W., Avraamides, M. N., & Loomis, J. M. (2007). Sensorimotor alignment effects in the learning environment and in novel environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 33, 1092–1107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lessels, S., & Ruddle, R. A. (2005). Movement around real and virtual cluttered environments. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 14, 580–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, T. P. (2003). How are the locations of objects in the environment represented in memory? In C. Freksa, W. Brauer, C. Habel, & K. F. Wender (Eds.), Lecture notes in artificial intelligence: Spatial cognition III (pp. 174–191). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, T. P., Rump, B., & Werner, S. (2003). Egocentric and geocentric frames of reference in memory of large-scale space. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 589–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montello, D. R. (1991). Spatial orientation and the angularity of urban routes: A field study. Environment & Behavior, 23, 47–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mou, W., & McNamara, T. P. (2002). Intrinsic frames of reference in spatial memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 28, 162–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, A. E., Montello, D. R., & Hegarty, M. (1999). Spatial knowledge acquisition from maps and from navigation in real and virtual environments. Memory & Cognition, 27, 741–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruddle, R. A., & Lessels, S. (2006). For efficient navigational search, humans require full physical movement, but not a rich visual scene. Psychological Science, 17, 460–465.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shelton, A. L., & McNamara, T. P. (1997). Multiple views of spatial memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 102–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shelton, A. L., & McNamara, T. P. (2001). Systems of spatial reference in human memory. Cognitive Psychology, 43, 274–310.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Valiquette, C. M., McNamara, T. P., & Labrecque, J. S. (2007). Biased representations of the spatial structure of navigable environments. Psychological Research, 71, 288–297.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Werner, S., & Schmidt, K. (1999). Environmental reference systems for large-scale spaces. Spatial Cognition & Computation, 1, 447–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B., Narasimham, G., Westerman, C., Rieser, J., & Bodenheimer, B. (2007). Functional similarities in spatial representations between real and virtual environments. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 4 (2, No. 12).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan W. Kelly.

Additional information

This work was supported by NIMH Grant 2-R01-MH57868 and a Vanderbilt University Discovery Grant.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kelly, J.W., McNamara, T.P. Spatial memories of virtual environments: How egocentric experience, intrinsic structure, and extrinsic structure interact. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 15, 322–327 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.2.322

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.2.322

Keywords

Navigation