Abstract
An implementation intention encoding, one that specifies the concrete situation that is appropriate for initiating an intended action and links that situational cue to the intended action, has been shown to improve prospective memory. One proposed mechanism is that implementation intentions create automatized prospective remembering. This view anticipates that implementation intentions should prevent prospective memory decline in highly cognitively demanding situations. Contrary to this expectation, although implementation intention encoding enhanced prospective memory (Experiments 1 and 2), implementation-intention encoding did not buffer against significant prospective memory decline in high-cognitive-demand conditions (Experiments 1–3), and in Experiment 3, implementation intention encoding produced lower levels of prospective memory performance than did behavioral practice in the high-cognitive-demand situation. We suggest that although implementation intentions may stimulate a strong associative encoding (between an anticipated environmental cue and an intended action), that encoding does not support a completely automatized prospective memory response.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aarts, H., &Dijksterhuis, A. (2000). Habits as knowledge structures: Automaticity in goal-directed behavior.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,78, 53–63.
Azouvi, P., Jokic, C., Van der Linden, M., Marlier, N., &Bussel, B. (1996). Working memory and supervisory control after severe closed-head injury: A study of dual task performance and random generation.Journal of Clinical & Experimental Neuropsychology,18, 317–337.
Ball, C. T., &Little, J. C. (2006). A comparison of involuntary autobiographical memory retrievals.Applied Cognitive Psychology,20, 1167–1179.
Bayer, U. C., Achtziger, A., Gollwitzer, P. M., &Moskowitz, G. B. (2009). Responding to subliminal cues: Do if-then plans facilitate action preparation and initiation without conscious intent?Social Cognition,27, 183–201.
Brandstätter, V., Lengfelder, A., &Gollwitzer, P. M. (2001). Implementation intentions and efficient action initiation.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,81, 946–960.
Callender, A. A., &McDaniel, M. A. (2007). The benefits of embedded question adjuncts for low and high structure builders.Journal of Educational Psychology,99, 339–348.
Chasteen, A. L., Park, D. C., &Schwarz, N. (2001). Implementation intentions and facilitation of prospective memory.Psychological Science,12, 457–461.
Cohen, A.-L., Dixon, R. A., &Lindsay, D. S. (2005). The intention interference effect and aging: Similar magnitude of effects for young and old adults.Applied Cognitive Psychology,19, 1177–1197.
Cohen, A.-L., &Gollwitzer, P. M. (2008). The cost of remembering to remember: Cognitive load and implementation intentions influence ongoing task performance. In M. Kliegel, M. A. McDaniel, & G. O. Einstein (Eds.),Prospective memory: Cognitive, neuroscience, developmental, and applied perspectives (pp. 367–390). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (in press). Prospective memory and what costs do not reveal about retrieval processes: A commentary on Smith, Hunt, McVay, and McConnell (2007).Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition.
Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., Thomas, R., Mayfield, S., Shank, H., Morrisette, N., &Breneiser, J. (2005). Multiple processes in prospective memory retrieval: Factors determining monitoring versus spontaneous retrieval.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,134, 327–342.
Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., Williford, C. L., Pagan, J. L., &Dismukes, R. K. (2003). Forgetting of intentions in demanding situations is rapid.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied,9, 147–162.
Einstein, G. O., Smith, R. E., McDaniel, M. A., &Shaw, P. (1997). Aging and prospective memory: The influence of increased task demands at encoding and retrieval.Psychology & Aging,12, 479–488.
Evans, F. J. (1978). Monitoring attention deployment by random number generation: An index to measure subjective randomness.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,12, 35–38.
Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans.American Psychologist,54, 493–503.
Gollwitzer, P. M., &Brandstätter, V. (1997). Implementation intentions and effective goal pursuit.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,73, 186–199.
Hirshman, E., &Bjork, R. A. (1988). The generation effect: Support for a two-factor theory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,14, 484–494.
Kliegel, M., Martin, M., McDaniel, M. A., &Einstein, G. O. (2001). Varying the importance of a prospective memory task: Differential effects across time- and event-based prospective memory.Memory,9, 1–11.
Kliegel, M., Martin, M., McDaniel, M. A., &Einstein, G. O. (2004). Importance effects on performance in event-based prospective memory tasks.Memory,12, 553–561.
Kliegel, M., Martin, M., McDaniel, M. A., Einstein, G. O., &Moor, C. (2007). Realizing complex delayed intentions in young and old adults: The role of planning aids.Memory & Cognition,35, 1735–1746.
Kvavilashvili, L., &Mandler, G. (2004). Out of one's mind: A study of involuntary semantic memories.Cognitive Psychology,48, 47–94.
Liu, L. L., &Park, D. C. (2004). Aging and medical adherence: The use of automatic processes to achieve effortful things.Psychology & Aging,19, 318–325.
Marsh, R. L., &Hicks, J. L. (1998). Event-based prospective memory and executive control of working memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 336–349.
Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., &Watson, V. (2002). The dynamics of intention retrieval and coordination of action in event-based prospective memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,28, 652–659.
McDaniel, M. A., &Einstein, G. O. (2007).Prospective memory: An overview and synthesis of an emerging field. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
McDaniel, M. A., Einstein, G. O., Graham, T., &Rall, E. (2004). Delaying execution of intentions: Overcoming the costs of interruptions.Applied Cognitive Psychology,18, 533–547.
McDaniel, M. A., Einstein, G. O., &Rendell, P. G. (2008). The puzzle of inconsistent age-related declines in prospective memory: A multiprocess explanation. In M. Kliegel, M. A. McDaniel, & G. O. Einstein (Eds.),Prospective memory: Cognitive, neuroscience, developmental, and applied perspectives (pp. 141–160). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
McDaniel, M. A., Guynn, M. J., Einstein, G. O., &Breneiser, J. (2004). Cue-focused and reflexive-associative processes in prospective memory retrieval.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,30, 605–614.
McDaniel, M. A., Howard, D. C., &Butler, K. M. (2008). Implementation intentions facilitate prospective memory under high attention demands.Memory & Cognition,36, 716–724.
McDaniel, M. A., Robinson-Riegler, B., &Einstein, G. O. (1998). Prospective remembering: Perceptually driven or conceptually driven processes?Memory & Cognition,26, 121–134.
McDaniel, M. A., &Waddill, P. J. (1990). Generation effects for context words: Implications for item-specific and multifactor theories.Journal of Memory & Language,29, 201–211.
Milne, S., Orbell, S., &Sheeran, P. (2002). Combining motivational and volitional interventions to promote exercise participation: Protection motivation theory and implementation intentions.British Journal of Health Psychology,7, 163–184.
Moscovitch, M. (1994). Memory and working with memory: Evaluation of a component process model and comparisons with other models. In D. L. Schacter & E. Tulving (Eds.),Memory systems (pp. 269–310). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Norman, K. A., Newman, E. L., &Detre, G. (2007). A neural network model of retrieval-induced forgetting.Psychological Review,114, 887–953.
Orbell, S., Hodgkins, S., &Sheeran, P. (1997). Implementation intentions and the theory of planned behavior.Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin,23, 945–954.
Orbell, S., &Sheeran, P. (2000). Motivational and volitional processes in action initiation: A field study of the role of implementation intentions.Journal of Applied Social Psychology,30, 780–797.
Scullin, M. K., Einstein, G. O., &McDaniel, M. A. (2009). Evidence for spontaneous retrieval of suspended but not finished prospective memories.Memory & Cognition,37, 425–433.
Sheeran, P., &Orbell, S. (1999). Augmenting the theory of planned behavior: Roles for anticipated regret and descriptive norms.Journal of Applied Social Psychology,29, 2107–2142.
Smith, R. E. (2003). The cost of remembering in event-based prospective memory: Investigating the capacity demands of delayed intention performance.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,29, 347–361.
Winograd, E. (1988). Some observations on prospective remembering. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.),Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues (Vol. 1, pp. 348–353). Chichester, U.K.: Wiley.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McDaniel, M.A., Scullin, M.K. Implementation intention encoding does not automatize prospective memory responding. Memory & Cognition 38, 221–232 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.38.2.221
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.38.2.221