Abstract
Inner speech is typically characterized as either the activation of abstract linguistic representations or a detailed articulatory simulation that lacks only the production of sound. We present a study of the speech errors that occur during the inner recitation of tongue-twister-like phrases. Two forms of inner speech were tested: inner speech without articulatory movements and articulated (mouthed) inner speech. Although mouthing one’s inner speech could reasonably be assumed to require more articulatory planning, prominent theories assume that such planning should not affect the experience of inner speech and, consequently, the errors that are “heard” during its production. The errors occurring in articulated inner speech exhibited the phonemic similarity effect and the lexical bias effect—two speech-error phenomena that, in overt speech, have been localized to an articulatory-feature-processing level and a lexical—phonological level, respectively. In contrast, errors in unarticulated inner speech did not exhibit the phonemic similarity effect—just the lexical bias effect. The results are interpreted as support for a flexible abstraction account of inner speech. This conclusion has ramifications for the embodiment of language and speech and for the theories of speech production.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abramson, M., & Goldinger, S. D. (1997). What the reader’s eye tells the mind’s ear: Silent reading activates inner speech. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 1059–1068.
Aziz-Zadeh, L., Cattaneo, L., Rochat, M., & Rizzolatti, G. (2005). Covert speech arrest induced by rTMS over both motor and nonmotor left hemisphere frontal sites. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 928–938. doi:10.1162/0898929054021157
Baars, B. J., Motley, M. T., & MacKay, D. G. (1975). Output editing for lexical status in artificially elicited slips of the tongue. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 14, 382–391. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(75)80017-X
Baddeley, A., & Wilson, B. (1985). Phonological coding and short-term memory in patients without speech. Journal of Memory & Language, 24, 490–502. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(85)90041-5
Bailey, T. M., & Hahn, U. (2005). Phoneme similarity and confusability. Journal of Memory & Language, 52, 339–362. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2004.12.003
Barch, D. M., Sabb, F. W., Carter, C. S., Braver, T. S., Noll, D. C., & Cohen, J. D. (1999). Overt verbal responding during fMRI scanning: Empirical investigations of problems and potential solutions. NeuroImage, 10, 642–657. doi:10.1006/nimg.1999.0500
Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 22, 577–609. doi:10.1017/S0140525X99002149
Brocklehurst, P., & Corley, M. (2009, September). Lexical bias and phonemic similarity: The case of inner speech. Poster presented at the 15th Annual Conference on Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing, Barcelona.
Caplan, D., Rochon, E., & Waters, G. S. (1992). Articulatory and phonological determinants of word length effects in span tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45A, 177–192. doi:10.1080/14640749208401323
Cook, A. E., & Meyer, A. S. (2008). Capacity demands of phoneme selection in word production: New evidence from dual-task experiments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 34, 886–899. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.34.4.886
Dell, G. S. (1978). Slips of the mind. In M. Paradis (Ed.), The fourth LACUS forum (pp. 69–75). Columbia, SC: Hornbeam.
Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283–321. doi:1 0.1037/0033-295X.93.3.283
Dell, G. S. (1990). Effects of frequency and vocabulary type on phonological speech errors. Language & Cognitive Processes, 5, 313–349. doi: 10.1080/01690969008407066
Dell, G. S., & Repka, R. J. (1992). Errors in inner speech. In B. J. Baars (Ed.), Experimental slips and human error: Exploring the architecture of volition (pp. 237–262). New York: Plenum.
Ferreira, V. S., & Pashler, H. (2002). Central bottleneck influences on the processing stages of word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 28, 1187–1199. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.28.6.1187
Frisch, S. (1996). Similarity and frequency in phonology. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
Galantucci, B., Fowler, C. A., & Turvey, M. T. (2006). The motor theory of speech perception reviewed. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 361–377.
Garnsey, S. M., & Dell, G. S. (1984). Some neurolinguistic implications of prearticulatory editing in production. Brain & Language, 23, 64–73. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(84)90006-3
Gibbons, J. D. (1985). Nonparametric methods for quantitative analysis (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: American Sciences Press.
Goldrick, M. (2004). Phonological features andphonotactic constraints in speech production. Journal of Memory & Language, 51, 586–603. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2004.07.004
Goldrick, M., & Rapp, B. (2007). Lexical and post-lexical phonological representations in spoken production. Cognition, 102, 219–260. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2005.12.010
Hartsuiker, R. J. (2006). Are speech error patterns affected by a monitoring bias? Language & Cognitive Processes, 21, 856–891. doi:10.1080/01690960600824138
Hartsuiker, R. J., Corley, M., & Martensen, H. E. (2005). The lexical bias effect is modulated by context, but the standard monitoring account doesn’t fly: Related beply to Baars et al. (1975). Journal of Memory & Language, 52, 58–70. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2004.07.006
Hartsuiker, R. J., Kolk, H. H. J., & Martensen, H. (2005). The division of labor between internal and external speech monitoring. In R. J. Hartsuiker, R. Bastiaanse, A. Postma, & F. Wijnen (Eds.), Phonological encoding and monitoring in normal and pathological speech (pp. 187–205). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
Hollander, M., & Wolfe, D. A. (1973). Nonparametric statistical methods. New York: Wiley.
Hu, X., & Batchelder, W. H. (1994). The statistical analysis of general processing tree models with the EM algorithm. Psychometrika, 59, 21–47. doi:10.1007/BF02294263
Huettig, F., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2010). Listening to yourself is like listening to others: External, but not internal, verbal self-monitoring is based on speech perception. Language & Cognitive Processes, 25, 347–374. doi:10.1080/01690960903046926
Indefrey, P., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2004). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition, 92, 101–144. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2002.06.001
Kittredge, A. K., Dell, G. S., Verkuilen, J., & Schwartz, M. F. (2008). Where is the effect of frequency in word production? Insights from aphasic picture-naming errors. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 25, 463–492. doi:10.1080/02643290701674851
Kučera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Levelt, W. J. M. (1983). Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition, 14, 41–104. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(83)90026-4
Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Levelt, W. J. M. (1999). Producing spoken language: A blueprint of the speaker. In C. M. Brown & P. Hagoort (Eds.), The neurocognition of language (pp. 83–122). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 22, 1–38. doi:10.1017/S0140525X99001776
Liberman, A. M., Delattre, P., & Cooper, F. S. (1952). The role of selected stimulus-variables in the perception of the unvoiced stop consonants. American Journal of Psychology, 65, 497–516. doi:10.2307/1418032
Liberman, A. M., & Mattingly, I. G. (1985). The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition, 21, 1–36. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(85)90021-6
MacKay, D. G. (1970). Spoonerisms: The structure of errors in the serial order of speech. Neuropsychologia, 8, 323–350. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(70)90078-3
MacKay, D. G. (1981). The problem of rehearsal or mental practice. Journal of Motor Behavior, 13, 274–285.
MacKay, D. G. (1990). Perception, action, and awareness: A three-body problem. In O. Neumann, & W. Prinz (Eds.), Relationships between perception and action (pp. 269–303). Heidelberg: Springer.
MacKay, D. G. (1992). Constraints on theories of inner speech. In D. Reisberg (Ed.), Auditory imagery (pp. 121–149). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
McGuire, P. K., Silbersweig, D. A., Murray, R. M., David, A. S., Frackowiak, R. S., & Frith, C. D. (1996). Functional anatomy of inner speech and auditory verbal imagery. Psychological Medicine, 26, 29–38. doi:10.1017/S0033291700033699
Moshagen, M. (2010). multiTree: A computer program for the analysis of multinomial processing tree models. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 42–54. doi:10.3758/BRM.42.1.42
Nickels, L., & Howard, D. (1995). Phonological errors in aphasic naming: Comprehension, monitoring and lexicality. Cortex, 31, 209–237.
Nooteboom, S. G. (2005). Lexical bias revisited: Detecting, rejecting and repairing speech errors in inner speech. Speech Communication, 47, 43–58. doi:10.1016/j.specom.2005.02.003
Nooteboom, S., & Quené, H. (2008). Self-monitoring and feedback: A new attempt to find the main cause of lexical bias in phonological speech errors. Journal of Memory & Language, 58, 837–861. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.05.003
Nozari, N., & Dell, G. S. (2009). More on lexical bias: How efficient can a “lexical editor” be? Journal of Memory & Language, 60, 291–307. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2008.09.006
Oomen, C. C., & Postma, A. (2001). Effects of time pressure on mechanisms of speech production and self-monitoring. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30, 163–184. doi:10.1023/A:1010377828778
Oppenheim, G. M., & Dell, G. S. (2008). Inner speech slips exhibit lexical bias, but not the phonemic similarity effect. Cognition, 106, 528–537. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.02.006
Özdemir, R., Roelofs, A., & Levelt, W. J. (2007). Perceptual uniqueness point effects in monitoring internal speech. Cognition, 105, 457–465. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2006.10.006
Palmer, E. D., Rosen, H. J., Ojemann, J. G., Buckner, R. L., Kelley, W. M., & Petersen, S. E. (2001). An event-related fMRI study of overt and covert word stem completion. NeuroImage, 14, 182–193. doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0779
Paulesu, E., Frith, C. D., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1993). The neural correlates of the verbal component of working memory. Nature, 362, 342–345. doi:10.1038/362342a0
Postma, A. (2000). Detection of errors during speech production: A review of speech monitoring models. Cognition, 77, 97–132. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00090-1
Postma, A., & Noordanus, C. (1996). The production and detection of speech errors in silent, mouthed, noise-masked, and normal auditory feedback speech. Language & Speech, 39, 375–392.
Pulvermüller, F. (2005). Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 576–582. doi:10.1038/nrn1706
Reisberg, D., Smith, J. D., Baxter, D. A., & Sonenshine, M. (1989). “Enacted” auditory images are ambiguous; “pure” auditory images are not. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41A, 619–641.
Roelofs, A. (2004). Error biases in spoken word planning and monitoring by aphasic and nonaphasic speakers: Comment on Rapp and Goldrick (2000). Psychological Review, 111, 561–572. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.111.2.561
Sahin, N. T., Pinker, S., Cash, S. S., Schomer, D., & Halgren, E. (2009). Sequential processing of lexical, grammatical, and phonological information within Broca’s area. Science, 326, 445–449. doi:10.1126/science.1174481
Schiller, N. O., Jansma, B. M., Peters, J., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2006). Monitoring metrical stress in polysyllabic words. Language & Cognitive Processes, 21, 112–140. doi:10.1080/01690960400001861
Shergill, S. S., Bullmore, E. T., Brammer, M. J., Williams, S. C. R., Murray, R. M., & McGuire, P. K. (2001). A functional study of auditory verbal imagery. Psychological Medicine, 31, 241–253. doi:10.1017/S003329170100335X
Sheskin, D. (2000). Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press.
Shuster, L. I., & Lemieux, S. K. (2005). An fMRI investigation of covertly and overtly produced mono- and multisyllabic words. Brain & Language, 93, 20–31. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2004.07.007
Smith, J. D., Reisberg, D., & Wilson, M. (1992). Subvocalization and auditory imagery: Interactions between the inner ear and the inner voice. In D. Reisberg (Ed.), Auditory imagery (pp. 95–119). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Smith, S. M., Brown, H. O., Toman, J. E. P., & Goodman, L. S. (1947). The lack of cerebral effects of d-tubocuarine. Anesthesiology, 8, 1–14. doi:10.1097/00000542-194701000-00001
Sokolov, A. N. (1972). Inner speech and thought. New York: Plenum.
Stemberger, J. P. (1991). Apparent anti-frequency effects in language production: The addition bias and phonological underspecification. Journal of Memory & Language, 30, 161–185. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(91)90002-2
Thompson-Schill, S. L., D’Esposito, M., Aguirre, G. K., & Farah, M. J. (1997). Role of left inferior prefrontal cortex in retrieval of semantic knowledge: A reevaluation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 94, 14792–14797. doi:10.1073/pnas.94.26.14792
Vallar, G., & Cappa, S. F. (1987). Articulation and verbal short-term memory: Evidence from anarthria. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 4, 55–77. doi:10.1080/02643298708252035
Vigliocco, G., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2002). The interplay of meaning, sound, and syntax in sentence production. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 442–472. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.128.3.442
Vygotskiî, L. S. (1965). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Watson, J. B. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological Review, 20, 158–177. doi:10.1037/h0074428
Wheeldon, L. R., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1995). Monitoring the time course of phonological encoding. Journal of Memory & Language, 34, 311–334. doi:10.1006/jmla.1995.1014
Yetkin, F. Z., Hammeke, T. A., Swanson, S. J., Morris, G. L., Mueller, W. M., McAuliffe, T. L., & Haughton, V. M. (1995). A comparison of functional MR activation patterns during silent and audible language tasks. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 16, 1087–1092.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants DC 000191 and HD 44458.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Oppenheim, G.M., Dell, G.S. Motor movement matters: The flexible abstractness of inner speech. Mem Cogn 38, 1147–1160 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.38.8.1147
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.38.8.1147