Abstract
Studies examining the beneficial effect of testing on memory have relied almost exclusively on verbal materials. Whether testing can improve the learning of novel, abstract visuospatial information was investigated, using Chinese characters as study stimuli. Subjects with no prior Chinese language experience studied English words paired with their Chinese equivalents. Subsequently, they either restudied the pairs twice or attempted to retrieve covertly the Chinese characters twice (with feedback provided afterward). The durations of the study and the retrieval/feedback trials were equated. On a final test given after 10 min (Experiment 1) or 24 h (Experiment 2), the subjects who had practiced retrieval were more accurate at writing/drawing the Chinese characters than were those who had studied repeatedly. The same result was replicated when learning condition was manipulated within subjects (Experiment 3). In predictions of future performance made after training, however, the subjects seemed unaware that retrieval practice was more effective than repeated studying. Testing enhances visuospatial learning, with potential implications for learning a foreign language that uses a writing script different from one’s language: Repeated retrieval from memory trumps repeated studying.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbott, E. E. (1909). On the analysis of the factors of recall in the learning process. Psychological Monographs, 11, 159–177.
Agarwal, P. K., Karpicke, J. D., Kang, S. H. K., Roediger, H. L., III, & McDermott, K. B. (2008). Examining the testing effect with open-and closed-book tests. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 861–876. doi:10.1002/acp.1391
Bjork, R. A. (1975). Retrieval as a memory modifier: An interpretation of negative recency and related phenomena. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Information processing and cognition: The Loyola symposium (pp. 123–144). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bjork, R. A. (1994). Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. In J. Metcalfe & A. R. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 185–205). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Butler, A. C., & Roediger, H. L., III (2007). Testing improves long-term retention in a simulated classroom setting. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19, 514–527. doi:10.1080/09541440701326097
Carpenter, S. K. (2009). Cue strength as a moderator of the testing effect: The benefits of elaborative retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 35, 1563–1569. doi:10.1037/a0017021
Carpenter, S. K., & DeLosh, E. L. (2005). Application of the testing and spacing effects to name learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 619–636. doi:10.1002/acp.1101
Carpenter, S. K., & DeLosh, E. L. (2006). Impoverished cue support enhances subsequent retention: Support for the elaborative retrieval explanation of the testing effect. Memory & Cognition, 34, 268–276.
Carpenter, S. K., & Pashler, H. (2007). Testing beyond words: Using tests to enhance visuospatial map learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 474–478.
Carpenter, S. K., Pashler, H., & Vul, E. (2006). What types of learning are enhanced by a cued recall test? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 826–830.
Carpenter, S. K., Pashler, H., Wixted, J. T., & Vul, E. (2008). The effects of tests on learning and forgetting. Memory & Cognition, 36, 438–448. doi:10.3758/MC.36.2.438
Carrier, M., & Pashler, H. (1992). The influence of retrieval on retention. Memory & Cognition, 20, 633–642.
Chan, J. C. K., McDermott, K. B., & Roediger, H. L., III (2006). Retrieval-induced facilitation: Initially nontested material can benefit from prior testing of related material. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 553–571. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.135.4.553
Connor, L. T., Dunlosky, J., & Hertzog, C. (1997). Age-related differences in absolute but not relative metamemory accuracy. Psychology & Aging, 12, 50–71. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.12.1.50
Cull, W. L. (2000). Untangling the benefits of multiple study opportunities and repeated testing for cued recall. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, 215–235. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720 (200005/06)14:3<215::AID-ACP640>3.0.CO;2-1
Dunlosky, J., Hertzog, C., Kennedy, M. R. T., & Thiede, K. W. (2005). The self-monitoring approach for effective learning. Cognitive Technology, 10, 4–11.
Glover, J. A. (1989). The “testing” phenomenon: Not gone but nearly forgotten. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 392–399. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.392
Hertzog, C., Dixon, R. A., & Hultsch, D. F. (1990). Relationships between metamemory, memory predictions, and memory task performance in adults. Psychology & Aging, 5, 215–227. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.5.2.215
Hourihan, K. L., Ozubko, J. D., & MacLeod, C. M. (2009). Directed forgetting of visual symbols: Evidence for nonverbal selective rehearsal. Memory & Cognition, 37, 1059–1068. doi:10.3758/MC.37.8.1059
Kang, S. H. K., McDermott, K. B., & Roediger, H. L., III (2007). Test format and corrective feedback modify the effect of testing on long-term retention. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19, 528–558. doi:10.1080/09541440601056620
Karpicke, J. D., Butler, A. C., & Roediger, H. L., III (2009). Metacognitive strategies in student learning: Do students practice retrieval when they study on their own? Memory, 17, 471–479. doi:10.1080/09658210802647009
Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L., III (2008). The critical importance of retrieval for learning. Science, 319, 966–968. doi:10.1126/science.1152408
Karpicke, J. D., & Smith, M. (2010). Separate mnemonic effects of retrieval practice and elaborative encoding. Manuscript under revision.
Krumboltz, J. D., & Weisman, R. G. (1962). The effect of overt versus covert responding to programed instruction on immediate and delayed retention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 53, 89–92. doi:10.1037/h0041100
McDaniel, M. A., & Fisher, R. P. (1991). Tests and test feedback as learning sources. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 16, 192–201. doi:10.1016/0361-476X(91)90037-L
Pyc, M. A., & Rawson, K. A. (2009). Testing the retrieval effort hypothesis: Does greater difficulty correctly recalling information lead to higher levels of memory? Journal of Memory & Language, 60, 437–447. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2009.01.004
Roediger, H. L., III, & Karpicke, J. D. (2006a). The power of testing memory: Basic research and implications for educational practice. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 181–210. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00012.x
Roediger, H. L., III, & Karpicke, J. D. (2006b). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17, 249–255. doi:10.1111/j.l467-9280.2006.01693.x
Shaffer, W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1972). Rehearsal and storage of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 92, 292–296. doi:10.1037/h0032076
Tan, L. H., Spinks, J. A., Eden, G. F., Perfetti, C. A., & Siok, W. T. (2005). Reading depends on writing, in Chinese. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 8781–8785. doi:10.1073/pnas.0503523102
Watkins, M. J. (1985). Strategies of picture rehearsal: A comment on Proctor’s (1983) article. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 11, 821–824. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.11.1-4.821
Wheeler, M. A., Ewers, M., & Buonanno, J. F. (2003). Different rates of forgetting following study versus test trials. Memory, 11, 571–580. doi:10.1080/09658210244000414
Wheeler, M. A., & Roediger, H. L., III (1992). Disparate effects of repeated testing: Reconciling Ballard’s (1913) and Bartlett’s (1932) results. Psychological Science, 3, 240–245. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00036.x
Wohldmann, E. L., Healy, A. E., & Bourne, L. E., Jr. (2008). A mental practice superiority effect: Less retroactive interference and more transfer than physical practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 34, 823–833. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.34.4.823
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by a Collaborative Activity Award (220020041) from the James S. McDonnell Foundation.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kang, S.H.K. Enhancing visuospatial learning: The benefit of retrieval practice. Mem Cogn 38, 1009–1017 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.38.8.1009
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.38.8.1009