Abstract
Humans routinely encode and retrieve experiences in interactive, collaborative contexts. Yet much of what we know about human memory comes from research on individuals working in isolation. Some recent research has examined collaboration during retrieval, but not much is known about how collaboration during encoding affects memory. We examined this issue. Participants created episodes by elaborating on study materials alone or collaboratively, and they later performed a cued-recall task alone, with the study partner, or with a different partner (Experiment 1). Collaborative encoding impaired recall. This counterintuitive outcome was found for both individual and group recall, even when the same partners collaborated across encoding and retrieval. This impairment was significantly reduced, but persisted, when the encoding instructions encouraged free-flowing collaboration (Experiment 2). Thus, the collaborative-encoding deficit is robust in nature and likely occurs because collaborative encoding produces less effective cues for later retrieval.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andersson, J., & Rönnberg, J. (1995). Recall suffers from collaboration: Joint recall effects of friendship and task complexity. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9, 199–211. doi:10.1002/acp.2350090303
Andersson, J., & Rönnberg, J. (1997). Cued memory collaboration: Effects of friendship and type of retrieval cue. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 273–287. doi:10.1080/713752558
Baddeley, A. [D.] (1986). Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.
Barnier, A. J., & Sutton, J. (2008). From individual to collective memory: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. Memory, 16, 177–182. doi:10.1080/09541440701828274
Basden, B. H., Basden, D. R., Bryner, S., & Thomas, R. L., III (1997). A comparison of group and individual remembering: Does collaboration disrupt retrieval strategies? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 1176–1189. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.23.5.1176
Basden, B. H., Basden, D. R., & Henry, S. (2000). Costs and benefits of collaborative remembering. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, 497–507. doi:10.1002/1099-0720(200011/12)14:6<497::AID-ACP665>3.0.CO;2-4
Basden, B. H., Reysen, M. B., & Basden, D. R. (2002). Transmitting false memories in social groups. American Journal of Psychology, 115, 211–231. doi:10.2307/1423436
Basden, D. R., & Basden, B. H. (1995). Some tests of the strategy disruption interpretation of part-list cuing inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 1656–1669. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.21.6.1656
Blumen, H. M., & Rajaram, S. (2008). Influence of re-exposure and retrieval disruption during group collaboration on later individual recall. Memory, 16, 231–244. doi:10.1080/09658210701804495
Brown, D. S. (2003). High school biology: A group approach to concept mapping. American Biology Teacher, 65, 192–197.
Clark, S. E., Hori, A., Putnam, A., & Martin, T. P. (2000). Group collaboration in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 1578–1588. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.26.6.1578
Coman, A., Manier, D., & Hirst, W. (2009). Forgetting the unforgettable through conversation: Socially shared retrieval-induced forgetting of September 11 memories. Psychological Science, 20, 627–633. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02343.x
Craik, F. I. M., Govoni, R., Naveh-Benjamin, M., & Anderson, N. D. (1996). The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 159–180. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.125.2.159
Cuc, A., Koppel, J., & Hirst, W. (2007). Silence is not golden: A case for socially shared retrieval-induced forgetting. Psychological Science, 18, 727–733. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01967.x
Dudukovic, N. M., Marsh, E. J., & Tversky, B. (2004). Telling a story or telling it straight: The effects of entertaining versus accurate retellings on memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 125–143. doi:10.1002/acp.953
Echterhoff, G., Higgins, E. T., & Groll, S. (2005). Audience-tuning effects on memory: The role of shared reality. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 89, 257–276. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.3.257
Echterhoff, G., Higgins, E. T., Kopietz, R., & Groll, S. (2008). How communication goals determine when audience tuning biases memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 3–21. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.137.1.3
Echterhoff, G., Higgins, E. T., & Levine, J. M. (2009). Shared reality: Experiencing commonality with others’ inner states about the world. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 496–521.
Finlay, F., Hitch, G. J., & Meudell, P. R. (2000). Mutual inhibition in collaborative recall: Evidence for a retrieval-based account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 1556–1567. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.26.6.1556
French, L., Garry, M., & Mori, K. (2008). You say tomato? Collaborative remembering leads to more false memories for intimate couples than for strangers. Memory, 16, 262–273. doi:10.1080/ 09658210701801491
Gabbert, F., Memon, A., Allan, K., & Wright, D. B. (2004). Say it to my face: Examining the effects of socially encountered misinformation. Legal & Criminological Psychology, 9, 215–227. doi:10.1348/ 1355325041719428
Gabbert, F., Memon, A., & Wright, D. B. (2006). Memory conformity: Disentangling the steps toward influence during a discussion. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 480–485.
Gabbert, F., Memon, A., & Wright, D. B. (2007). I saw it for longer than you: The relationship between perceived encoding duration and memory conformity. Acta Psychologica, 124, 319–331. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.03.009
Gathercole, S. E. (2008). Working memory. In J. H. Byrne (Series Ed.) & H. L. Roediger III (Vol. Ed.), Learning and memory: A comprehensive reference. Vol. 2: Cognitive psychology of memory (pp. 33–51). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Graf, P., & Schacter, D. L. (1985). Implicit and explicit memory for new associations in normal and amnesic subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 11, 501–518. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.11.3.501
Halbwachs, M. (1980). The collective memory. (F. J. Ditter, Jr. & V. Y. Ditter, Trans.). New York: Harper Row. (Original work published 1950)
Harris, C. B., Paterson, H. M., & Kemp, R. I. (2008). Collaborative recall and collective memory: What happens when we remember together? Memory, 16, 213–230. doi:10.1080/09658210701811862
Higgins, E. T., & Rholes, W. S. (1978). “Saying is believing”: Effects of message modification on memory and liking for the person described. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 363–378. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(78)90032-x
Hinsz, V. B., Tindale, R. S., & Vollrath, D. A. (1997). The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 43–64. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.43
Hirst, W., & Manier, D. (2008). Towards a psychology of collective memory. Memory, 16, 183–200. doi:10.1080/09658210701811912
Jenkins, J. J. (1979). Four points to remember: A tetrahedral model of memory experiments. In L. S. Cermak & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Levels of processing in human memory (pp. 429–446). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Johansson, N. O., Andersson, J., & Rönnberg, J. (2005). Compensating strategies in collaborative remembering in very old couples. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 46, 349–359. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2005.00465.x
Karau, S. J., & Williams, K. D. (1993). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 65, 681–706. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.681
Krause, U.-M., Stark, R., & Mandl, H. (2009). The effects of cooperative learning and feedback on e-learning in statistics. Learning & Instruction, 19, 158–170. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.03.003
Kwon, S. Y., & Cifuentes, L. (2007). Using computers to individually-generate vs. collaboratively-generate concept maps. Educational Technology & Society, 10, 269–280.
Kwon, S. Y., & Cifuentes, L. (2009). The comparative effect of individually- constructed vs. collaboratively-constructed computer-based concept maps. Computers & Education, 52, 365–375. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.09.012
Laughlin, P. R., & Sweeney, J. D. (1977). Individual-to-group and group-to-individual transfer in problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 3, 246–254. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.3.2.246
Liang, D. W., Moreland, R., & Argote, L. (1995). Group versus individual training and group performance: The mediating role of transactive memory. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 384–393. doi:10.1177/0146167295214009
Mäntylä, T., & Nilsson, L.-G. (1983). Are my cues better than your cues? Uniqueness and reconstruction as prerequisites for optimal recall of verbal materials. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 24, 303–312. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.1983.tb00504.x
Marsh, E. J. (2007). Retelling is not the same as recalling: Implications for memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 16–20. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00467.x
Marsh, E. J., & Tversky, B. (2004). Spinning the stories of our lives. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 491–503. doi:10.1002/acp.1001
Meade, M. L., & Roediger, H. L., III (2002). Explorations in the social contagion of memory. Memory & Cognition, 30, 995–1009.
Merckelbach, H., Van Roermund, H., & Candel, I. (2007). Effects of collaborative recall: Denying true information is as powerful as suggesting misinformation. Psychology, Crime & Law, 13, 573–581. doi:10.1080/10683160601160679
Meudell, P. R., Hitch, G. J., & Kirby, P. (1992). Are two heads better than one? Experimental investigations of the social facilitation of memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 6, 525–543. doi:10.1002/ acp.2350060606
Mulligan, N. W., & Lozito, J. P. (2006). An asymmetry between memory encoding and retrieval: Revelation, generation, and transfer-appropriate processing. Psychological Science, 17, 7–11. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01657.x
Nijstad, B. A., & Stroebe, W. (2006). How the group affects the mind: A cognitive model of idea generation in groups. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 10, 186–213. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_1
Pasupathi, M., Lucas, S., & Coombs, A. (2002). Conversational functions of autobiographical remembering: Long-married couples talk about conflicts and pleasant topics. Discourse Processes, 34, 163–192. doi:10.1207/s15326950dp3402_3
Pasupathi, M., Stallworth, L. M., & Murdoch, K. (1998). How what we tell becomes what we know: Listener effects on speakers’ long-term memory for events. Discourse Processes, 26, 1–25.
Paulus, P. (2000). Groups, teams, and creativity: The creative potential of idea-generating groups. Applied Psychology, 49, 237–262. doi:10.1111/1464-0597.00013
Peltokorpi, V. (2008). Transactive memory systems. Review of General Psychology, 12, 378–394. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.12.4.378
Rajaram, S., & Barber, S. J. (2008). Retrieval processes in memory. In J. H. Byrne (Series Ed.) & H. L. Roediger III (Vol. Ed.), Learning and memory: A comprehensive reference. Vol. 2: Cognitive psychology of memory (pp. 261–283). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Rajaram, S., & Pereira-Pasarin, L. P. (2007). Collaboration can improve individual recognition memory: Evidence from immediate and delayed tests. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 95–100.
Reysen, M. B. (2007). The effects of social pressure on false memories. Memory & Cognition, 35, 59–65.
Roediger, H. L., III, Meade, M. L., & Bergman, E. T. (2001). Social contagion of memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 365–371.
Ross, M., Spencer, S. J., Blatz, C. W., & Restorick, E. (2008). Collaboration reduces the frequency of false memories in older and younger adults. Psychology & Aging, 23, 85–92. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.23.1.85
Ross, M., Spencer, S. J., Linardatos, L., Lam, K. C. H., & Perunovic, M. (2004). Going shopping and identifying landmarks: Does collaboration improve older people’s memory? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 683–696. doi:10.1002/acp.1023
Slamecka, N. J. (1969). Testing for associative storage in multitrial free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 557–560. doi:10.1037/ h0027909
Thorley, C., & Dewhurst, S. A. (2007). Collaborative false recall in the DRM procedure: Effects of group size and group pressure. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19, 867–881. doi:10.1080/09541440600872068
Tulving, E. (1983). Elements of episodic memory. New York: Oxford University Press.
Tulving, E., & Osler, S. (1968). Effectiveness of retrieval cues in memory for words. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 593–601. doi:10.1037/h0026069
Wegner, D. M. (1987). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In B. Mullen & G. R. Goethals (Eds.), Theories of group behavior (pp. 185–208). New York: Springer.
Wegner, D. M., Erber, R., & Raymond, P. (1991). Transactive memory in close relationships. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 61, 923–929. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.61.6.923
Weldon, M. S. (2001). Remembering as a social process. In D. L. Medin (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 40, pp. 67–120). San Diego: Academic Press.
Weldon, M. S., & Bellinger, K. D. (1997). Collective memory: Collaborative and individual processes in remembering. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 1160–1175. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.23.5.1160
Weldon, M. S., Blair, C., & Huebsch, P. D. (2000). Group remembering: Does social loafing underlie collaborative inhibition? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 1568–1577. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.26.6.1568
Wertsch, J. V. (2002). Voices of collective remembering. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wilson, M. (1988). MRC Psycholinguistic Database: Machine-usable dictionary, version 2.00. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 20, 6–10.
Yuker, H. E. (1955). Group atmosphere and memory. Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology, 51, 17–23. doi:10.1037/h0046464
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barber, S.J., Rajaram, S. & Aron, A. When two is too many: Collaborative encoding impairs memory. Memory & Cognition 38, 255–264 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.38.3.255
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.38.3.255