Abstract
In the present study, we examined the hypothesis of task-specific access to mental objects from verbal working memory. It is currently assumed that a mental object is brought into the focus of attention in working memory by a process of object selection, which provides this object for any upcoming mental operation (Oberauer, 2002). We argue that this view must be extended, since the selection of information for processing is always guided by current intentions and task goals. In our experiments, it was required that two kinds of comparison tasks be executed on digits selected from a set of three digits held in working memory. The tasks differed in regard to the object features the comparison was based on. Access to a new mental object (object switch) took consistently longer on the semantic comparison task than on the recognition task. This difference is not attributable to object selection difficulty and cannot be fully accounted for by task difficulty or differences in rehearsal processes. The results support our assumptions that (1) mental objects are selected for a given specific task and, so, are accessed with their specific task-relevant object features; (2) verbal mental objects outside the focus of attention are usually not maintained at a full feature level but are refreshed phonologically by subvocal rehearsal; and (3) if more than phonological information is required, access to mental objects involves feature retrieval processes in addition to object selection.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baddeley, A. D. (1986).Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Baddeley, A. D. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory?Trends in Cognitive Sciences,4, 417–423.
Baddeley, A. D., &Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 8, pp. 47–89). New York: Academic Press.
Bao, M., Li, Z.-H., &Zhang, D.-R. (2007). Binding facilitates attention switching within working memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,33, 959–969.
Beringer, J. (1999).Experimental run time system. Frankfurt am Main: Berisoft Cooperation.
Carlson, R. A., Sullivan, M. A., &Schneider, W. (1989). Practice and working memory effects in building procedural skill.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15,517–5266.
Cowan, N. (1988). Evolving conceptions of memory storage, selective attention, and their mutual constraints within the human information- processing system.Psychological Bulletin,104, 163–191.
Cowan, N. (1995).Attention and memory: An integrated framework. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,24, 87–185.
Engle, R. W., Tuholsky, S. W., Laughlin, J. E., &Conway, R. A. (1999). Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: A latent-variable approach.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,128, 309–331.
Fanini, A., Nobre, A. C., &Chelazzi, L. (2006). Selecting and ignoring the component features of a visual object: A negative priming paradigm.Visual Cognition,14, 584–618.
Garavan, H. (1998). Serial attention within working memory.Memory & Cognition,26, 263–276.
Griffin, I. C., &Nobre, A. C. (2003). Orienting attention to locations in internal representations.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,15, 1176–1194.
Haarmann, H., Davelaar, E. J., &Usher, M. (2003). Individual differences in semantic short-term memory capacity and reading comprehension.Journal of Memory & Language,48, 320–345.
Haarmann, H., &Usher, M. (2001). Maintenance of semantic information in capacity-limited item short-term memory.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,8, 568–578.
Hulme, C., Newton, P., Cowan, N., Stuart, G., &Brown, G. (1999). Think before you speak: Pauses, memory search, and trace redintegration processes in verbal memory span.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,25, 447–463.
Jones, D. M., Macken, W. J., &Nicholls, A. P. (2004). The phonological store of working memory: Is it phonological and is it a store?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,30, 656–674.
Kane, M. J., Hambrick, D. Z., Tuholski, S. W., Wilhelm, O., Payne, T. W., &Engle, R. W. (2004). The generality of working memory capacity: A latent-variable approach to verbal and visuospatial memory span and reasoning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,133, 189–217.
Kessler, Y., &Meiran, N. (2006). All updatable objects in working memory are updated whenever any of them are modified: Evidence from the memory updating paradigm.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,32, 570–585.
Kyllonen, P. C., &Christal, R. E. (1990). Reasoning ability is (little more than) working memory capacity?!Intelligence,14, 389–433.
Lepsien, J., Griffin, I. C., Devlin, J. T., &Nobre, A. C. (2005). Directing spatial attention in mental representations: Interactions between attentional orienting and working-memory load.NeuroImage,26,733–743.
Lepsien, J., &Nobre, A. C. (2006). Cognitive control of attention in the human brain: Insights from orienting attention to mental representations.Brain Research,1105, 20–31.
Li, Z. H., Sun, X. W., Wang, Z. X., Zhang, X. C., &Zhang, D. R. (2004). Behavioral and functional MRI study of attention shift in human verbal working memory.NeuroImage,21, 181–191.
Loftus, G. R., &Masson, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,1, 476–490.
Naveh-Benjamin, M., &Jonides, J. (1984). Maintenance rehearsal: A two-component analysis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,10, 369–385.
Nobre, A. C., Coull, J. T., Maquet, P., Frith, C. D., Vandenberghe, R., &Mesulam, M. M. (2004). Orienting attention to locations in perceptual versus mental representations.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,16, 363–373.
Oberauer, K. (2001). Removing irrelevant information from working memory: A cognitive aging study with the modified Sternberg task.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 948–957.
Oberauer, K. (2002). Access to information in working memory: Exploring the focus of attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,28, 411–421.
Oberauer, K. (2003). Selective attention to elements in working memory.Experimental Psychology,50, 257–269.
Oberauer, K. (2005). Control of the contents of working memory—A comparison of two paradigms and two age groups.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,31, 714–728.
Oberauer, K. (2007). Activation, binding, and selective access: An embedded three-component framework of working memory. In N. Osaka, R. Logie, & M. D’Esposito (Eds.),The cognitive neuroscience of working memory (pp. 351–368). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Oberauer, K., &Bialkova, S. (2009). Accessing information in working memory: Can the focus of attention grasp two elements at the same time?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,138, 64–87.
Page, M. P. A., Madge, A., Cumming, N., &Norris, D. G. (2007). Speech errors and the phonological similarity effect in short-term memory: Evidence suggesting a common locus.Journal of Memory & Language,56, 49–64.
Potter, M. C. (1993). Very short-term conceptual memory.Memory & Cognition,21, 156–161.
Saint-Aubin, J., &Poirier, M. (2000). Immediate serial recall of words and nonwords: Tests of the retrieval-based hypothesis.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,7, 332–340.
Schweickert, R. (1993). A multinominal processing tree model for degradation and redintegration in immediate recall.Memory & Cognition,21, 168–175.
Süß, H.-M., Oberauer, K., Wittmann, W. W., Wilhelm, O., &Schulze, R. (2002). Working-memory capacity explains reasoning ability—and a little bit more.Intelligence,30, 261–288.
Voigt, S., &Hagendorf, H. (2002). The role of task context for component processes in focus switching.Psychologische Beiträge,44, 248–274.
Woltz, D. J., &Was, C. A. (2006). Availability of related long-term memory during and after attention focus in working memory.Memory & Cognition,34, 668–684.
Woltz, D. J., &Was, C. A. (2007). Available but unattended conceptual information in working memory: Temporarily active semantic content or persistent memory for prior operations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,33, 155–168.
Zhang, Y. (2006).Stimulus complexity, encoding, retrieval and focus switching. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schwager, S., Hagendorf, H. Goal-directed access to mental objects in working memory: The role of task-specific feature retrieval. Memory & Cognition 37, 1103–1119 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.37.8.1103
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.37.8.1103