Abstract
Memory retrieval is a powerful learning event that influences whether an experience will be remembered in the future. Although retrieval can succeed in the presence of distraction, dividing attention during retrieval may reduce the power of remembering as an encoding event. In the present experiments, participants studied pictures of objects under full attention and then engaged in item recognition and source memory retrieval under full or divided attention. Two days later, a second recognition and source recollection test assessed the impact of attention during initial retrieval on long-term retention. On this latter test, performance was superior for items that had been tested initially under full versus divided attention. More importantly, even when items were correctly recognized on the first test, divided attention reduced the likelihood of subsequent recognition on the second test. The same held true for source recollection. Additionally, foils presented during the first test were also less likely to be later recognized if they had been encountered initially under divided attention. These findings demonstrate that attentive retrieval is critical for learning through remembering.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baddeley, A., Lewis, V., Eldridge, M., &Thomson, N. (1984). Attention and retrieval from long-term memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,113, 518–540.
Batchelder, W. H., &Riefer, D. M. (1990). Multinomial processing models of source monitoring.Psychological Review,97, 548–564.
Bayen, U. J., Murnane, K., &Erdfelder, E. (1996). Source discrimination, item detection, and multinomial models of source monitoring.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 197–215.
Butler, A. C., Marsh, E. J., Goode, M. K., &Roediger, H. L., III (2006). When additional multiple-choice lures aid versus hinder later memory.Applied Cognitive Psychology,20, 941–956.
Carrier, M., &Pashler, H. (1992). The influence of retrieval on retention.Memory & Cognition,20, 633–642.
Chan, J. C. K., &McDermott, K. B. (2007). The testing effect in recognition memory: A dual process account.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,33, 431–437.
Craik, F. I. M., Govoni, R., Naveh-Benjamin, M., &Anderson, N. D. (1996). The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,125, 159–180.
Fernandes, M. A., &Moscovitch, M. (2000). Divided attention and memory: Evidence of substantial interference effects at retrieval and encoding.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,129, 155–176.
Fernandes, M. A., &Moscovitch, M. (2002). Factors modulating the effect of divided attention during retrieval of words.Memory & Cognition,30, 731–744.
Fernandes, M. A., &Moscovitch, M. (2003). Interference effects from divided attention during retrieval in younger and older adults.Psychology & Aging,18, 219–230.
Gardiner, J. M., &Klee, H. (1976). Memory for remembered events: An assessment of output monitoring in free recall.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,15, 227–233.
Gates, A. I. (1917). Recitation as a factor in memorizing.Archives of Psychology,6, 1–104.
Hicks, J. L., &Marsh, R. L. (2000). Toward specifying the attentional demands of recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 1483–1498.
Hogan, R. M., &Kintsch, W. (1971). Differential effects of study and test trials on long-term recognition and recall.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,10, 562–567.
Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory.Journal of Memory & Language,30, 513–541.
Jacoby, L. L., Shimizu, Y., Daniels, K. A., &Rhodes, M. G. (2005). Modes of cognitive control in recognition and source memory: Depth of retrieval.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,12, 852–857.
Jacoby, L. L., Shimizu, Y., Velanova, K., &Rhodes, M. G. (2005). Age differences in depth of retrieval: Memory for foils.Journal of Memory & Language,52, 493–504.
Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., &Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring.Psychological Bulletin,114, 3–28.
Kensinger, E. A., Clarke, R. J., &Corkin, S. (2003). What neural correlates underlie successful encoding and retrieval? A functional magnetic resonance imaging study using a divided attention paradigm.Journal of Neuroscience,23, 2407–2415.
Knott, L. M., &Dewhurst, S. A. (2007). The effects of divided attention at study and test on false recognition: A comparison of DRM and categorized lists.Memory & Cognition,35, 1954–1965.
Landauer, T. K., &Bjork, R. A. (1978). Optimum rehearsal patterns and name learning. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.),Practical aspects of memory (pp. 625–632). London: Academic Press.
Lozito, J. P., &Mulligan, N. W. (2006). Exploring the role of attention during memory retrieval: Effects of semantic encoding and divided attention.Memory & Cognition,34, 986–998.
Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., Hancock, T. W., &Munsayac, K. (2002). Investigating the output monitoring component of event-based prospective memory performance.Memory & Cognition,30, 302–311.
Mulligan, N. W. (1998). The role of attention during encoding in implicit and explicit memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 27–47.
Mulligan, N. W. (2004). Generation and memory for contextual detail.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,30, 838–855.
Murnane, K., &Bayen, U. J. (1996). An evaluation of empirical measures of source identification.Memory & Cognition,24, 417–428.
Naveh-Benjamin, M., Craik, F. I. M., Guez, J., &Dori, H. (1998). Effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory: Further support for an asymmetry.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 1091–1104.
Naveh-Benjamin, M., Craik, F. I. M., Perretta, J. G., &Tonev, S. T. (2000). The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes: The resiliency of retrieval processes.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,53A, 609–625.
Roediger, H. L., III, & Karpicke, J. D. (2006a). The power of testing memory: Basic research and implications for educational practice.Perspectives on Psychological Science,1, 181–210.
Roediger, H. L., III, & Karpicke, J. D. (2006b). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention.Psychological Science,17, 249–255.
Roediger, H. L., III, & Marsh, E. J. (2005). The positive and negative consequences of multiple-choice testing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,31, 1155–1159.
Simons, J. S., Koutstaal, W., Prince, S., Wagner, A. D., &Schacter, D. L. (2003). Neural mechanisms of visual object priming: Evidence for perceptual and semantic distinctions in fusiform cortex.Neuro-Image,19, 613–626.
Skinner, E. I., &Fernandes, M. A. (2008). Interfering with remembering and knowing: Effects of divided attention at retrieval.Acta Psychologica,127, 211–221.
Stahl, C., &Klauer, K. C. (2007). HMMTree: A computer program for latent-class hierarchical multinomial processing tree models.Behavior Research Methods,39, 267–273.
Sugimori, E., &Kusumi, T. (2009). Limiting attentional resources influences performance and output monitoring of an event-based prospective memory task.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,21, 112–128.
Troyer, A. K., Winocur, G., Craik, F. I. M., &Moscovitch, M. (1999). Source memory and divided attention: Reciprocal costs to primary and secondary tasks.Neuropsychology,13, 467–474.
Tulving, E. (1985). Memory and consciousness.Canadian Psychology,26, 1–12.
Wheeler, M. A., Ewers, M., &Buonanno, J. F. (2003). Different rates of forgetting following study versus test trials.Memory,11, 571–580.
Yonelinas, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research.Journal of Memory & Language,46, 441–517.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by the National Institute of Mental Health (R01-MH076932), the National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression, and the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dudukovic, N.M., DuBrow, S. & Wagner, A.D. Attention during memory retrieval enhances future remembering. Memory & Cognition 37, 953–961 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.37.7.953
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.37.7.953