Abstract
Do various operational definitions of visual attention tap the same underlying process? To address this question, we probed visual selective attention using orientation of attention, flanker, and Stroop tasks. These were embedded in combined designs that enabled assessment of each effect, as well as their interaction. For the orientation task, performance was poorer at unexpected than at expected locations. The flanker effects also differed across the two locations. In contrast, the Stroop effects were comparable at expected and unexpected locations. We conclude that spatial attention (tapped by the orientation and the flanker tasks) and dimensional attention (tapped by the Stroop task) engage separate processes of visual selection, both of which are needed in normal attention processing.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Algom, D., Dekel, A., & Pansky, A. (1996). The perception of number from the separability of the stimulus: The Stroop effect revisited. Memory & Cognition, 24, 557–572.
Botvinick, M. M., Carter, C. S., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624–652.
Callejas, A., Lupiáñez, J., & Tudela, P. (2004). The three attentional networks: On their independence and interactions. Brain & Cognition, 54, 225–227.
Chen, Z. (2003). Attentional focus, processing load, and Stroop interference. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 888–900.
Cho, Y. S., Lien, M. C., & Proctor, R. W. (2006). Stroop dilution depends on the nature of the color carrier but not on its location. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 32, 826–839.
Danziger, S., Kingstone, A., & Ward, R. (2001). Environmentally defined frames of reference: Their time course and sensitivity to spatial cues and attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27, 494–503.
Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143–149.
Eriksen, B. A., Eriksen, C. W., & Hoffman, J. E. (1986). Recognition memory and attentional selection: Serial scanning is not enough. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 12, 476–483.
Eriksen, C. W., & Hoffman, J. E. (1973). The extent of processing of noise elements during selective encoding from visual displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 14, 155–160.
Eriksen, C. W., & St. James, J. D. (1986). Visual attention within and around the focus of attention: A zoom lens model. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 225–240.
Fan, J., McCandliss, B. D., Fossella, J., Flombaum, J. I., & Posner, M. I. (2005). The activation of attentional networks. NeuroImage, 26, 471–479.
Fan, J., McCandliss, B. D., Sommer, T., Raz, A., & Posner, M. I. (2002). Testing the efficiency and independence of attentional networks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 340–347.
Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 1030–1044.
Goldsmith, M. (1998). What’s in a location? Comparing object-based and space-based models of feature integration in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 189–219.
Kahneman, D., & Chajczyk, D. (1983). Tests of the automaticity of reading: Dilution of Stroop effects by color-irrelevant stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 9, 497–509.
Kinchla, R. A., Solis-Macias, V., & Hoffman, J. (1983). Attending to different levels of structure in a visual image. Perception & Psychophysics, 33, 1–10.
Kuhn, G., & Kingstone, A. (2009). Look away! Eyes and arrows engage oculomotor responses automatically. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71, 314–327.
Lachter, J., Forster, K. I., & Ruthruff, E. (2004). Forty-five years after Broadbent (1958): Still no identification without attention. Psychological Review, 111, 880–913.
Lupiáñez, J., & Funes, M. J. (2005). Peripheral spatial cues modulate spatial congruency effects: Analysing the “locus” of the cueing modulation. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 17, 727–752.
MacDonald, A. W., III, Cohen, J. D., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2000). Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. Science, 288, 1835–1838.
MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163–203.
Martin, M. (1979). Local and global processing: The role of sparsity. Memory & Cognition, 7, 476–484.
Melara, R. D., & Algom, D. (2003). Driven by information: A tectonic theory of Stroop effects. Psychological Review, 110, 422–471.
Melara, R. D., & Mounts, J. R. W. (1993). Selective attention to Stroop dimensions: Effects of baseline discriminability, response mode, and practice. Memory & Cognition, 21, 627–645.
Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353–383.
Pomerantz, J. R. (1983). Global and local precedence: Selective attention in form and motion perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112, 516–540.
Posner, M. I. (1978). Chronometric explorations of the mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3–25.
Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processesz (pp. 531–556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Posner, M. I., & Petersen, S. E. (1990). The attention system of the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 13, 25–42.
Posner, M. I., & Raichle, M. E. (EdS.) (1994). Images of mind. New York: Scientific American Library.
Posner, M. I., & Rothbart, M. K. (2004). Hebb’s neural networks support the integration of psychological science. Canadian Psychology, 45, 265–278.
Posner, M. I., & Rothbart, M. K. (2005). Influencing brain networks: Implications for education. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 99–103.
Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R. R., & Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 160–174.
Redick, T. S., & Engle, R. W. (2006). Working memory capacity and attention network test performance. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 713–721.
Rueda, M. R., Fan, J., Halparin, J., Gruber, D., Lercari, L. P., Mc-Candliss, B. D., & Posner, M. I. (2004). Development of attention during childhood. Neuropsychologia, 42, 1029–1040.
Shalev, L., & Algom, D. (2000). Stroop and Garner effects in and out of Posner’s beam: Reconciling two conceptions of selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 997–1017.
Stoffer, T. H. (1993). The time course of attentional zooming: A comparison of voluntary and involuntary allocation of attention to the levels of compound stimuli. Psychological Research, 56, 14–25.
Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial-verbal reaction. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662.
Ward, L. M. (1982). Determinants of attention to local and global features of visual forms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 8, 562–581.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chajut, E., Schupak, A. & Algom, D. Are spatial and dimensional attention separate? Evidence from Posner, Stroop, and Eriksen tasks. Memory & Cognition 37, 924–934 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.37.6.924
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.37.6.924