Abstract
A number of previous studies have shown that false recognition of critical items in the Deese/Roediger-McDermott paradigm is reduced when study items are presented visually rather than auditorily; however, this effect has not been uniformly demonstrated. We investigated three potential boundary conditions of the effect of study modality in false recognition. Experiments 1 and 2 showed no reduction in false recognition following visual study presentation when the yes-no recognition test was not preceded by a recall test. Experiment 3 showed that visual study presentation can reduce false recognition without a preceding recall test, if the recognition test uses remember-know instructions. The order of the recognition test items did not influence the effect of visual study presentation on false recognition in Experiment 1. In general, the data imply that distinctive processing at study can reduce false memory in recognition if the test demands draw attention to the dimension of distinctive processing.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arndt, J., & Reder, L. M. (2003). The effect of distinctive visual information on false recognition. Journal of Memory & Language, 48, 1–15.
Cleary, A. M., & Greene, R. L. (2002). Paradoxical effects of presentation modality on false memory. Memory, 10, 55–61.
Deese, J. (1959). On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 17–22.
Gallo, D. A. (2006). Associative illusions of memory: False memory research in DRM and related tasks. New York: Psychology Press.
Gallo, D. A., McDermott, K. B., Percer, J. M., & Roediger, H. L., III (2001). Modality effects in false recall and false recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 339–353.
Gallo, D. A., & Roediger, H. L., III (2002). Variability among word lists in eliciting memory illusions: Evidence for associative activation and monitoring. Journal of Memory & Language, 47, 469–497.
Gallo, D. A., & Roediger, H. L., III (2003). The effects of associations and aging on illusory recollections. Memory & Cognition, 31, 1036–1044.
Hege, A. C. G., & Dodson, C. S. (2004). Why distinctive information reduces false memories: Evidence for both impoverished relational encoding and distinctiveness heuristic accounts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30, 787–795.
Hicks, J. L., & Marsh, R. L. (2001). False recognition occurs more frequently during source identification than during old-new recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 375–383.
Hunt, R. R. (2003). Two contributions of distinctive processing to accurate memory. Journal of Memory & Language, 48, 811–825.
Hunt, R. R., & Einstein, G. O. (1981). Relational and item-specific information in memory. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 20, 497–514.
Hunt, R. R., & McDaniel, M. A. (1993). The enigma of organization and distinctiveness. Journal of Memory & Language, 32, 421–445.
Hunt, R. R., & Worthen, J. B. (Eds.) (2006). Distinctiveness and memory. New York: Oxford University Press.
Johnson, M. K., Nolde, S. F., & De Leonardis, D. M. (1996). Emotional focus and source monitoring. Journal of Memory & Language, 35, 135–156.
Kellogg, R. T. (2001). Presentation modality and mode of recall in verbal false memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 913–919.
Marsh, R. L., & Hicks, J. L. (1998). Test formats change source-monitoring decision processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 1137–1151.
Mather, M., Henkel, L. A., & Johnson, M. K. (1997). Evaluating characteristics of false memories: Remember/know judgments and memory characteristics questionnaire compared. Memory & Cognition, 25, 826–837.
Maylor, E. A., & Mo, A. (1999). Effects of study-test modality on false recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 90, 477–493.
McKone, E., & Murphy, B. (2000). Implicit false memory: Effects of modality and multiple study presentations on long-lived semantic priming. Journal of Memory & Language, 43, 89–109.
Payne, D. G., Elie, C. J., Blackwell, J. M., & Neuschatz, J. S. (1996). Memory illusions: Recalling, recognizing, and recollecting events that never occurred. Journal of Memory & Language, 35, 261–285.
Pierce, B. H., Gallo, D. A., Weiss, J. A., & Schacter, D. L. (2005). The modality effect in false recognition: Evidence for test-based monitoring. Memory & Cognition, 33, 1407–1413.
Read, J. D. (1996). From a passing thought to a false memory in 2 minutes: Confusing real and illusory events. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 105–111.
Roediger, H. L., III, & McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 803–814.
Roediger, H. L., III, Watson, J. M., McDermott, K. B., & Gallo, D. A. (2001). Factors that determine false recall: A multiple regression analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 385–407.
Schacter, D. L., Israel, L., & Racine, C. (1999). Suppressing false recognition in younger and older adults: The distinctiveness heuristic. Journal of Memory & Language, 40, 1–24.
Smith, R. E., & Hunt, R. R. (1998). Presentation modality affects false memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 710–715.
Smith, R. E., Lozito, J. P., & Bayen, U. J. (2005). Adult age differences in distinctive processing: The modality effect in false recall. Psychology & Aging, 20, 486–492.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported in part by Grant R15 MH067582 from the National Institute of Mental Health (to R.R.H.), and by Individual National Research Service Award F32 AG20021 from the National Institute on Aging (to R.E.S.).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Smith, R.E., Hunt, R.R. & Gallagher, M.P. The effect of study modality on false recognition. Memory & Cognition 36, 1439–1449 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.8.1439
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.8.1439