Abstract
The picture superiority effect has been well documented in tests of item recognition and recall. The present study shows that the picture superiority effect extends to associative recognition. In three experiments, students studied lists consisting of random pairs of concrete words and pairs of line drawings; then they discriminated between intact (old) and rearranged (new) pairs of words and pictures at test. The discrimination advantage for pictures over words was seen in a greater hit rate for intact picture pairs, but there was no difference in the false alarm rates for the two types of stimuli. That is, there was no mirror effect. The same pattern of results was found when the test pairs consisted of the verbal labels of the pictures shown at study (Experiment 4), indicating that the hit rate advantage for picture pairs represents an encoding benefit. The results have implications for theories of the picture superiority effect and models of associative recognition.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bonin, P., Peereman, R., Malardier, N., Méot, A., & Chalard, M. (2003). A new set of 299 pictures for psycholinguistic studies: French norms for name agreement, image agreement, conceptual familiarity, visual complexity, image variability, age of acquisition, and naming latencies. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 158–167.
Borges, M. A., Stepnowsky, M. A., & Holt, L. H. (1977). Recall and recognition of words and pictures by adults and children. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 9, 113–114.
Cleary, A. M., Curran, T., & Greene, R. L. (2001). Memory for detail in item versus associative recognition. Memory & Cognition, 29, 413–423.
Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 11, 671–684.
Criss, A. H., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2004). Pairs do not suffer interference from other types of pairs or single items in associative recognition. Memory & Cognition, 32, 1284–1297.
Diller, D. E., Nobel, P. A., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2001). An ARC-REM model for accuracy and response time in recognition and recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 414–435.
Durso, F. T., & Johnson, M. K. (1980). The effects of orienting tasks on recognition, recall, and modality confusion of pictures and words. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 19, 416–429.
Durso, F. T., & O’Sullivan, C. S. (1983). Naming and remembering proper and common nouns and pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 9, 497–510.
Gehring, R. E., Toglia, M. P., & Kimble, G. A. (1976). Recognition memory for words and pictures at short and long retention intervals. Memory & Cognition, 4, 256–260.
Glanzer, M., & Adams, J. K. (1985). The mirror effect in recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 13, 8–20.
Greene, R. L. (1996). Mirror effect in order and associative information: Role of response strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 687–695.
Greene, R. L. (2004). Recognition memory for pseudowords. Journal of Memory & Language, 50, 259–267.
Gronlund, S. D., & Ratcliff, R. (1989). Time course of item and associative information: Implications for global memory models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 846–858.
Hintzman, D. L., Caulton, D. A., & Curran, T. (1994). Retrieval constraints and the mirror effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20, 275–289.
Hockley, W. E. (1992). Item versus associative information: Further comparisons of forgetting rates. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 18, 1321–1330.
Hockley, W. E. (1994). Reflections of the mirror effect for item and associative recognition. Memory & Cognition, 22, 713–722.
Hockley, W. E., & Niewiadomski, M. W. (2007). Strength-based mirror effects in item and associative recognition: Evidence for within-list criterion changes. Memory & Cognition, 35, 679–688.
Humphreys, M. S. (1976). Relational information and the context effect in recognition memory. Memory & Cognitionv, 4, 221–232.
Humphreys, M. S. (1978). Item and relational information: A case for context independent retrieval. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 17, 175–187.
Intraub, H., & Nicklos, S. (1985). Levels of processing and picture memory: The physical superiority effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 11, 284–298.
Juola, J. F., Taylor, G. A., & Young, M. E. (1974). Stimulus encoding and decision processes in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102, 1108–1115.
Kelley, R., & Wixted, J. T. (2001). On the nature of associative information in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 701–722.
Lewandowsky, S., & Hockley, W. E. (1987). Does cha rm need depth? Similarity and levels-of-processing effects in cued recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 13, 443–455.
Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (1991). Detection theory: A user’s guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Madigan, S. (1974). Representational storage in picture memory. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 4, 567–568.
Madigan, S. (1983). Picture memory. In J. C. Yuille (Ed.), Imagery, memory, and cognition: Essays in honor of Allan Paivio (pp. 65–89). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Malmberg, K. J., & Xu, J. (2007). On the flexibility and the fallibility of associative memory. Memory & Cognition, 35, 545–556.
Mintzer, M. Z., & Snodgrass, J. G. (1999). The picture superiority effect: Support for the distinctiveness model. American Journal of Psychology, 112, 113–146.
Nelson, D. L. (1979). Remembering pictures and words: Appearance, significance, and name. In L. S. Cermak & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Levels of processing in human memory (pp. 45–76). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Nelson, D. L., Reed, V. S., & McEvoy, C. L. (1977). Learning to order pictures and words: A model of sensory and semantic encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 3, 485–497.
Nelson, D. L., Reed, V. S., & Walling, J. R. (1976). Pictorial superiority effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 2, 523–528.
Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. London: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Paivio, A. (1976). Imagery in recall and recognition. In J. Brown (Ed.), Recall and recognition (pp. 103–129). New York: Wiley.
Paivio, A., & Csapo, K. (1973). Picture superiority in free recall: Imagery or dual coding? Cognitive Psychology, 5, 176–206.
Paivio, A., Rogers, T. B., & Smythe, P. C. (1968). Why are pictures easier to recall than words? Psychonomic Science, 11, 137–138.
Paivio, A., Smythe, P. C., & Yuille, J. C. (1968). Imagery versus meaningfulness of nouns in paired-associate learning. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 22, 427–441.
Potter, M. C., & Faulconer, B. A. (1975). Time to understand pictures and words. Nature, 253, 437–438.
Rotello, C. M., & Heit, E. (2000). Associative recognition: A case of recall-to-reject processing. Memory & Cognition, 28, 907–922.
Rotello, C. M., Macmillan, N. A., & Van Tassel, G. (2000). Recall-to-reject in recognition: Evidence from ROC curves. Journal of Memory & Language, 43, 67–88.
Smith, M. C., & Magee, L. E. (1980). Tracing the time course of picture-word processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 373–392.
Snodgrass, J. G., & Burns, P. M. (1978). The effect of repeated tests on recognition memory for pictures and words. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 11, 263–266.
Snodgrass, J. G., & McClure, P. (1975). Storage and retrieval properties of dual codes for pictures and words in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 1, 521–529.
Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 6, 174–215.
Snodgrass, J. G., Volvovitz, R., & Walfish, E. R. (1972). Recognition for words, pictures, and words 1 pictures. Psychonomic Science, 27, 345–347.
Snodgrass, J. G., Wasser, B., Finkelstein, M., & Goldberg, L. B. (1974). On the fate of visual and verbal memory codes for pictures and words: Evidence for a dual coding mechanism in recognition memory. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 13, 27–37.
Stenberg, G., Radeborg, K., & Hedman, L. R. (1995). The picture superiority effect in a cross-modality recognition task. Memory & Cognition, 23, 425–441.
Stretch, V., & Wixted, J. T. (1998). On the difference between strength-based and frequency-based mirror effects in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 1379–1396.
Verde, M. F., & Rotello, C. M. (2004). Strong memories obscure weak memories in associative recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 1062–1066.
Weldon, M. S., & Coyote, K. C. (1996). Failure to find the picture superiority effect in implicit conceptual memory tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 670–686.
Weldon, M. S., & Roediger, H. L., III (1987). Altering retrieval demands reverses the picture superiority effect. Memory & Cognition, 15, 269–280.
Weldon, M. S., Roediger, H. L., III, & Challis, B. H. (1989). The properties of retrieval cues constrain the picture superiority effect. Memory & Cognition, 17, 95–105.
Xu, J., & Malmberg, K. J. (2007). Modeling the effects of verbal and nonverbal pair strength on associative recognition. Memory & Cognition, 35, 526–544.
Yonelinas, A. P. (1997). Recognition memory ROCs for item and associative information: The contribution of recollection and familiarity. Memory & Cognition, 25, 747–763.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by Discovery Grant 14015 from the National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada to the author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hockley, W.E. The picture superiority effect in associative recognition. Memory & Cognition 36, 1351–1359 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.7.1351
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.7.1351