Abstract
Models of idiom comprehension differ in their predictions concerning compositionality: Some claim that idiomatic meaning is the result of compositional analysis initiated at the earliest stages of comprehension, whereas others claim that compositional analysis occurs only at late stages, subsequent to direct retrieval—especially for idioms that are highly familiar. We evaluated these alternatives in four experiments by using a variety of online and offline comprehension measures. In Experiment 1, we analyzed the normative characteristics of 219 idioms with respect to these predictions. Dimensions of interest included several measures of decomposability, familiarity, and word frequency of the idioms’ verbs and nouns. In Experiments 2 through 4, we determined how these dimensions relate to several online measures of idiom comprehension. High familiarity was associated with good comprehension across all experiments; however, facilitative effects of decomposability were found only for tasks that required an overt semantic judgment. Word frequency, but not semantic decomposability of the idiom-initial verb, was associated with comprehension for some measures. These data support a model of idiom comprehension, according to which figurative meaning arises from the time-dependent availability of multiple linguistic constraints, and in which decomposability plays a limited role in the earliest stages of idiom comprehension. Normative data for 210 of the idiomatic phrases may be downloaded from the Psychonomic Society Web archive at www.psychonomic.org/archive/.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abel, B. (2003). English idioms in the first language and second language lexicon: A dual representation approach. Second Language Research, 19, 329–358.
Baayen, R. H., Dijkstra, T., & Schreuder, R. (1997). Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual-route model. Journal of Memory & Language, 37, 94–117.
Bertram, R., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2000). The balance of storage and computation in morphological processing: The role of word formation type, affixal homonymy, and productivity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 489–511.
Blair, I. V., Urland, G. R., & Ma, J. E. (2002). Using Internet search engines to estimate word frequency. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 34, 286–290.
Bobko, P. (2001). Correlation and regression: Applications for industrial organizational psychology and management (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Bobrow, S. A., & Bell, S. M. (1973). On catching on to idiomatic expressions. Memory & Cognition, 1, 343–346.
Bradley, D. C. (1979). Lexical representation of derivational relations. In M. Aronoff & M. L. Kean (Eds.), Tuncture. Sarasota, CA: Anma Libri.
Burani, C., & Caramazza, A. (1987). Representation and processing of derived words. Language & Cognitive Processes, 2, 217–227.
Burani, C., & Laudanna, A. (1992). Units of representation for derived words in the lexicon. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 361–376). Amsterdam: Elsevier, North-Holland.
Burani, C., Salmaso, D., & Caramazza, A. (1984). Morphological structure and lexical access. Visible Language, 18, 348–358.
Cacciari, C., & Glucksberg, S. (1991). Understanding idiomatic expressions: The contribution of word meanings. In G. B. Simpson (Ed.), Understanding word and sentence (pp. 251–273). Amsterdam: Elsevier, North-Holland.
Cacciari, C., & Tabossi, P. (1988). The comprehension of idioms. Journal of Memory & Language, 27, 668–683.
Caillies, S., & Butcher, K. (2007). Processing of idiomatic expressions: Evidence for a new hybrid view. Metaphor & Symbol, 22, 79–108.
Caillies, S., & Le Sourn-Bissaoui, S. (2006). Idiom comprehension in French children: A cock-and-bull story. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 3, 189–206.
Caramazza, A., Laudanna, A., & Romani, C. (1988). Lexical access and inflectional morphology. Cognition, 28, 297–332.
Colé, P., Beauvillain, C., & Segui, J. (1989). On the representation and processing of prefixed and suffixed derived words: A differential frequency effect. Journal of Memory & Language, 28, 1–13.
Cowie, A. P. (1999). Phraseology and corpora: Some implications for dictionary-making. International Journal of Lexicography, 12, 307–323.
Cronk, B. C., Lima, S. D., & Schweigert, W. A. (1993). Idioms in sentences: Effects of frequency, literalness, and familiarity. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 22, 59–82.
Cronk, B. C., & Schweigert, W. A. (1992). The comprehension of idioms: The effects of familiarity, literalness, and usage. Applied Psycholinguistics, 13, 131–146.
Cutting, J. C., & Bock, K. (1997). That’s the way the cookie bounces: Syntactic and semantic components of experimentally elicited idiom blends. Memory & Cognition, 25, 57–71.
Fellbaum, C. (2007). Idioms and collocations: Corpus-based linguistic and lexicographic studies. London: Continuum.
Geeraerts, D. (1995). Specialization and reinterpretation in idioms. In M. Evaraert, E.-J. van der Linden, A. Schenk, & R. Schreuder (Eds.), Idioms: Structural and psychological perspectives (pp. 58–74). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gentner, D., & France, I. M. (1988). The verb mutability effect: Studies of the combinatorial semantics of nouns and verbs. In S. L. Small, G. W. Cottrell, & M. K. Tanenhaus (Eds.), Lexical ambiguity resolution: Perspectives from psycholinguistics, neuropsychology, and artificial intelligence (pp. 343–382). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (1980). Spilling the beans on understanding and memory for idioms in conversation. Memory & Cognition, 8, 149–156.
Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (1992). What do idioms really mean? Journal of Memory & Language, 31, 485–506.
Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (1995). Idiomaticity and human cognition. In M. Evaraert, E.-J. van der Linden, A. Schenk, & R. Schreuder (Eds.), Idioms: Structural and psychological perspectives (pp. 97–116). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (2006). Metaphor interpretation as embodied simulation. Mind & Language, 21, 434–458.
Gibbs, R. W., Jr., & Nayak, N. P. (1989). Psycholinguistic studies on the syntactic behavior of idioms. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 100–138.
Gibbs, R. W., Jr., Nayak, N. P., Bolton, J. L., & Keppel, M. E. (1989). Speakers’ assumptions about the lexical flexibility of idioms. Memory & Cognition, 17, 58–68.
Gibbs, R. W., Jr., Nayak, N. P., & Cutting, [J.] C. (1989). How to kick the bucket and not decompose: Analyzability and idiom processing. Journal of Memory & Language, 28, 576–593.
Gibbs, R. W., Jr., & O’Brien, J. E. (1990). Idioms and mental imagery: The metaphorical motivation for idiomatic meaning. Cognition, 36, 35–68.
Giora, R. (1997). On the priority of salient meanings: Studies of literal and figurative language. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 919–929.
Glucksberg, S., Brown, M., & McGlone, M. S. (1993). Conceptual metaphors are not automatically accessed during idiom comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 21, 711–719.
Gong, S.-P., & Ahrens, K. (2007). Processing conceptual metaphors in on-going discourse. Metaphor & Symbol, 22, 313–330
Gulland, D. M., & Hinds-Howell, D. G. (1994). Penguin dictionary of English idioms. London: Penguin.
Hamblin, J. L., & Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (1999). Why you can’t kick the bucket as you slowly die: Verbs in idiom comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28, 25–39.
Jackendoff, R. (2002). Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A., & Woolley, J. D. (1982). Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111, 228–238.
Katz, A. N., & Ferretti, T. R. (2001). Moment-by-moment reading of proverbs in literal and nonliteral contexts. Metaphor & Symbol, 16, 193–221.
Katz, A. N., & Ferretti, T. R. (2003). Reading proverbs in context: The role of explicit markers. Discourse Processes, 36, 19–46.
Keysar, B., & Bly, B. M. (1999). Swimming against the current: Do idioms reflect conceptual structure? Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 1559–1578.
Kučera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1994). The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review, 101, 676–703.
MacDonald, M. C., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2006). Constraint satisfaction accounts of lexical and sentence comprehension. In M. J. Traxler, & M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (2nd ed., pp. 581–611). London: Elsevier.
Marantz, A. (2005). Generative linguistics within the cognitive neuroscience of language. Linguistic Review, 22, 429–445.
McGinnis, M. (2002). On the systematic aspect of idioms. Linguistic Inquiry, 33, 665–672.
McGinnis, M. (2004). Lethal ambiguity. Linguistic Inquiry, 35, 47–95.
McGlone, M. S. (2007). What is the explanatory value of a conceptual metaphor? Language & Communication, 27, 109–126.
McGlone, M. S., Glucksberg, S., & Cacciari, C. (1994). Semantic productivity and idiom comprehension. Discourse Processes, 17, 167–190.
Moon, R. (1998). Fixed expressions and idioms in English: A corpusbased approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Nippold, M. A., & Taylor, C. L. (2002). Judgments of idiom familiarity and transparency: A comparison of children and adolescents. Journal of Speech, Language, & Hearing Research, 45, 384–391.
Nunberg, G. (1978). The pragmatics of reference. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics.
Nunberg, G., Sag, I. A., & Wasow, T. (1994). Idioms. Language, 70, 491–538.
Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime: A user’s guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools.
Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (1997). How complex simplex words can be. Journal of Memory & Language, 37, 118–139.
Schweigert, W. A. (1986). The comprehension of familiar and less familiar idioms. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 15, 33–45.
Spears, R. A. (2000). NTC’s dictionary of American slang and colloquial expressions. Hightstown, NJ: McGraw-Hill.
Sprenger, S. A., Levelt, W. J. M., & Kempen, G. (2006). Lexical access during the production of idiomatic phrases. Journal of Memory & Language, 54, 161–184.
St. John, M. F., & McClelland, J. L. (1990). Learning and applying contextual constraints in sentence comprehension. Artificial Intelligence, 46, 217–257.
Swinney, D. A., & Cutler, A. (1979). The access and processing of idiomatic expressions. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 18, 523–534.
Tabossi, P., Fanari, R., & Wolf, K. (2005). Spoken idiom recognition: Meaning retrieval and word expectancy. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 34, 465–495.
Tabossi, P., Fanari, R., & Wolf, K. (2008). Processing idiomatic expressions: Effects of semantic compositionality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 34, 313–327.
Taft, M. (1979). Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect. Memory & Cognition, 7, 263–272.
Taft, M. (2004). Morphological decomposition and the reverse base frequency effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A, 745–765.
Thibodeau, P., & Durgin, F. H. (2008). Productive figurative communication: Conventional metaphors facilitate the comprehension of related novel metaphors. Journal of Memory & Language, 58, 521–540.
Titone, D. A., & Connine, C. M. (1994a). Comprehension of idiomatic expressions: Effects of predictability and literality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20, 1126–1138.
Titone, D. A., & Connine, C. M. (1994b). Descriptive norms for 171 idiomatic expressions: Familiarity, compositionality, predictability, and literality. Metaphor & Symbolic Activity, 9, 247–270.
Titone, D. A., & Connine, C. M. (1999). On the compositional and noncompositional nature of idiomatic expressions. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 1655–1674.
Titone, D. A., Holzman, P. S., & Levy, D. L. (2002). Idiom processing in schizophrenia: Literal implausibility saves the day for idiom priming. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111, 313–320.
Van de Voort, M. E. C., & Vonk, W. (1995). You don’t die immediately when you kick an empty bucket: A processing view on semantic and syntactic characteristics of idioms. In M. Evaraert, E.-J. van der Linden, A. Schenk, & R. Schreuder (Eds.), Idioms: Structural and psychological perspectives (pp. 283–299). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Wilson, M. (1988). MRC Psycholinguistic Database: Machine-usable dictionary, version 2. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 20, 6–10.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Libben, M.R., Titone, D.A. The multidetermined nature of idiom processing. Memory & Cognition 36, 1103–1121 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.6.1103
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.6.1103