Abstract
One class of multiple-system models of category learning posits that within a single category-learning task people can learn to utilize different systems with different category representations to classify different stimuli. This is referred to as stimulus-dependent representation (SDR). The use of SDR implies that learners switch from subtask to subtask as trials demand. Thus, the use of SDR can be assessed via slowed response times, following a representation switch. Additionally, the use of SDR requires control of executive attention to keep inactive representations from interfering with the current response. Subjects were given a category learning task composed of one- and two-dimensional substructures. Control of executive attention was measured using a working memory capacity (WMC) task. Subjects most likely to be using SDR showed greater slowing of responses following a substructure switch and a greater correlation between learning performance and WMC. These results provide support for the principle of SDR in category learning and the reliance of SDR on executive attention.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions in Automatic Control, 19, 716–723.
Anderson, J. R., & Betz, J. (2001). A hybrid model of categorization. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 629–647.
Ashby, F. G., Alfonso-Reese, L. A., Turken, A. U., & Waldron, E. M. (1998). A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning. Psychological Review, 105, 442–481.
Ashby, F.G., Ell, S. W., & Waldron, E.M. (2003). Procedural learning in perceptual categorization. Memory & Cognition, 31, 1114–1125.
Ashby, F. G., & Gott, R. E. (1988). Decision rules in the perception and categorization of multidimensional stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 14, 33–53.
Ashby, F. G., & Townsend, J. T. (1986). Varieties of perceptual independence. Psychological Review, 93, 154–179.
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Conway, A. R. A., Cowan, N., & Bunting, M. F. (2001). The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: The importance of working memory capacity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 331–335.
Conway, A. R. A., Cowan, N., Bunting, M. F., Therriault, D. J., & Minkoff, S. R. B. (2002). A latent variable analysis of working memory capacity, short-term memory capacity, processing speed, and general fluid intelligence. Intelligence, 30, 163–183.
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–466.
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1983). Individual differences in integrating information between and within sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 9, 561–583.
Daneman, M., & Green, I. (1986). Individual differences in comprehending and producing words in context. Journal of Memory & Language, 25, 1–18.
Denton, S. E., Kruschke, J. K., & Erickson, M. A. (in press). Rule-based extrapolation: A continuing challenge for exemplar models. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
Engle, R. W. (2002). Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 19–23.
Engle, R. W. (2005). Automated symmetry span (E-Prime) [Computer software]. Retrieved from psychology.gatech.edu/renglelab/tasks.htm.
Engle, R. W., & Kane, M. J. (2004). Executive attention, working memory capacity, and a two-factor theory of cognitive control. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 44, pp. 145–199). San Diego: Academic Press.
Engle, R.W., Tuholski, S.W., Laughlin, J. E., & Conway, A. R. A. (1999). Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: A latent-variable approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 309–331.
Erickson, M. A. (1999). Rules and exemplars in category learning (Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington). Dissertation Abstracts International, 60, 2377B.
Erickson, M. A., & Kruschke, J. K. (1998). Rules and exemplars in category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 107–140.
Erickson, M. A., & Kruschke, J. K. (2002). Rule-based extrapolation in perceptual categorization. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 160–168.
Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. Oxford: Wiley.
Kalish, M. L., Lewandowsky, S., & Kruschke, J. K. (2004). Population of linear experts: Knowledge partitioning and function learning. Psychological Review, 111, 1072–1099.
Kane, M. J., Bleckley, M. K., Conway, A. R. A., & Engle, R. W. (2001). A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 169–183.
Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2002). The role of prefrontal cortex in working memory capacity, executive attention, and general fluid intelligence: An individual-differences perspective. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 637–671.
Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2003). Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: The contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 47–70.
Kane, M. J., Hambrick, D. Z., Tuholski, S.W., Wilhelm, O., Payne, T.W., & Engle, R. W. (2004). The generality of working memory capacity: A latent-variable approach to verbal and visuospatial memory span and reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 189–217.
Kruschke, J. K. (1992). ALCOVE: An exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning. Psychological Review, 99, 22–44.
Kruschke, J. K., & Erickson, M. A. (1994). Learning of rules that have high-frequency exceptions: New empirical data and a hybrid connectionist model. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 514–519). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Lewandowsky, S., Kalish, M. L., & Ngang, S. K. (2002). Simplified learning in complex situations: Knowledge partitioning in function learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 163–193.
Lewandowsky, S., & Kirsner, K. (2000). Knowledge partitioning: Context-dependent use of expertise. Memory & Cognition, 28, 295–305.
Lewandowsky, S., Roberts, L., & Yang, L.-X. (2006). Knowledge partitioning in categorization: Boundary conditions. Memory & Cognition, 34, 1676–1688.
Logan, G. D. (2004). Working memory, task switching, and executive control in the task span procedure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 218–236.
Logan, G. D., & Gordon, R. D. (2001). Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations. Psychological Review, 108, 393–434.
Long, D. L., & Prat, C. S. (2002). Working memory and Stroop interference: An individual differences investigation. Memory & Cognition, 30, 294–301.
Love, B. C., Medin, D. L., & Gureckis, T. M. (2004). SUSTAIN: A network model of category learning. Psychological Review, 111, 309–332.
Meng, X., Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1992). Comparing correlated correlation coefficients. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 172–175.
Monsell, S. (2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 134–140.
Norman, A. D., & Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behavior. In R. J. Davidson, G. E. Schwartz, & D. E. Shapiro (Eds.), Consciousness and self-regulation: Advances in research (Vol. 4, pp. 1–18). New York: Plenum.
Nosofsky, R. M. (1986). Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 39–57.
Nosofsky, R.M., & Johansen, M. K. (2000). Exemplar-based accounts of “multiple-system” phenomena in perceptual categorization. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 375–402.
Nosofsky, R. M., & Palmeri, T. J. (1997). An exemplar-based random walk model of speeded classification. Psychological Review, 104, 266–300.
Rodrigues, P. M., & Murre, J. M. J. (2007). Rules-plus-exception tasks: A problem for exemplar models? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 640–646.
Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research (Rev. ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1991). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6, 461–464.
Shute, V. J. (1991). Who is likely to acquire programming skills? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 7, 1–24.
Smith, E. E., Patalano, A. L., & Jonides, J. (1998). Alternative strategies of categorization. Cognition, 65, 167–196.
Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662.
Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory & Language, 28, 127–154.
Underwood, B. J. (1975). Individual differences as a crucible in theory construction. American Psychologist, 30, 128–134.
Usher, M., & McClelland, J. L. (2001). The time course of perceptual choice: The leaky, competing accumulator model. Psychological Review, 108, 550–592.
Yang, L.-X., & Lewandowsky, S. (2003). Context-gated knowledge partitioning in categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 663–679.
Yang, L.-X., & Lewandowsky, S. (2004). Knowledge partitioning in categorization: Constraints on exemplar models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30, 1045–1064.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Preparation of this article was supported by grants provided by the Academic Senate of the University of California, Riverside.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Erickson, M.A. Executive attention and task switching in category learning: Evidence for stimulus-dependent representation. Memory & Cognition 36, 749–761 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.4.749
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.4.749