Abstract
Task-switching performance was assessed in young and older adults as a function of the number of task sets to be actively maintained in memory (varied from 1 to 4) over the course of extended training (5 days). Each of the four tasks required the execution of a simple computational algorithm, which was instantaneously cued by the color of the two-digit stimulus. Tasks were presented in pure (task set size 1) and mixed blocks (task set sizes 2, 3, 4), and the task sequence was unpredictable. By considering task switching beyond two tasks, we found evidence for a cognitive control system that is not overwhelmed by task set size load manipulations. Extended training eliminated age effects in task-switching performance, even when the participants had to manage the execution of up to four tasks. The results are discussed in terms of current theories of cognitive control, including task set inertia and production system postulates.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allport, D. A., Styles, E. A., & Hsieh, S. (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 421–452). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Allport, D. A., & Wylie, G. R. (1999). Task-switching: Positive and negative priming of task-set. In G. W. Humphreys, J. Duncan, & A. M. Treisman (Eds.), Attention, space, and action: Studies in cognitive neuroscience (pp. 273–296). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Allport, [D.] A., & Wylie, G. [R.] (2000). Task switching, stimulus-response bindings, and negative priming. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 35–70). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Altmann, E. M. (2002). Functional decay of memory for tasks. Psychological Research, 66, 287–297.
Anderson, J. R., & Lebiere, C. (1998). The atomic components of thought. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Arbuthnott, K., & Frank, J. (2000). Executive control in set switching: Residual switch cost and task-set inhibition. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 33–41.
Birren, J. E., Allen, W. R., & Landau, H. G. (1954). The relation of problem length in simple addition to time required, probability of success, and age. Journal of Gerontology, 9, 150–161.
Birren, J. E., & Botwinick, J. (1951). Rate of addition as a function of difficulty and age. Psychometrika, 16, 219–232.
Cepeda, N. J., Kramer, A. F., & Gonzales de Sather, J. C. M. (2001). Changes in executive control across the life-span: Examination of taskswitching performance. Developmental Psychology, 37, 715–730.
Cerella, J. (1985). Information processing rates in the elderly. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 67–83.
Cerella, J. (1990). Aging and information-processing rate. In J. E. Birren & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (3rd ed., pp. 201–221). San Diego: Academic Press.
Daily, L. Z., Lovett, M. C., & Reder, L. M. (2001). Modeling individual differences in working memory performance: A source activation account. Cognitive Science, 25, 315–353.
De Jong, R. (2000). An intention-activation account of residual switch costs. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 357–376). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fagot, C. (1994). Chronometric investigations of task switching. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
Geary, D. C., Frensch, P. A., & Wiley, J. G. (1993). Simple and complex mental subtraction: Strategy choice and speed-of-processing differences in younger and older adults. Psychology & Aging, 8, 242–256.
Gilbert, S. J., & Shallice, T. (2002). Task switching: A PDP model. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 297–337.
Hahn, S., Andersen, G. J., & Kramer, A. F. (2004). Age influences on multi-dimensional set switching. Aging, Neuropsychology, & Cognition, 11, 25–36.
Jersild, A. T. (1927). Mental set and shift. Archives of Psychology, 14(Whole No. 89), 1–81.
Kieras, D. E., Meyer, D. E., Ballas, J. A., & Lauber, E. (2000). Modern computational perspectives on executive mental processes and cognitive control: Where to from here? In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 681–712). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Koch, I., Prinz, W., & Allport, A. (2005). Involuntary retrieval in alphabet—arithmetic tasks: Task-mixing and task-switching costs. Psychological Research, 69, 252–261.
Kramer, A. F., Hahn, S., & Gopher, D. (1999). Task coordination and aging: Explorations of executive control processes in the task switching paradigm. Acta Psychologica, 101, 339–378.
Kray, J., Li, K. Z. H., & Lindenberger, U. (2002). Age-specific changes in task-switching components: The role of task uncertainty. Brain & Cognition, 49, 363–381.
Kray, J., & Lindenberger, U. (2000). Adult age differences in task switching. Psychology & Aging, 15, 126–147.
Los, S. A. (1999). Identifying stimuli of different perceptual categories in mixed blocks of trials: Evidence for cost in switching between computational processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 3–23.
Lovett, M. C., Reder, L. M., & Lebiere, C. (1999). Modeling working memory in a unified architecture: An ACT-R perspective. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory (pp. 135–182). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mayr, U. (2001). Age differences in the selection of mental sets: The role of inhibition, stimulus ambiguity, and response-set overlap. Psychology & Aging, 16, 96–109.
Mayr, U. (2002). Inhibition of action rules. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 93–99.
Mayr, U., & Keele, S. W. (2000). Changing internal constraints on action: The role of backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 4–26.
Mayr, U., & Kliegl, R. (2000). Task-set switching and long-term memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 1124–1140.
McElree, B. (1998). Attended and non-attended states in working memory: Accessing categorized structures. Journal of Memory & Language, 38, 225–252.
McElree, B. (2001). Working memory and focal attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 817–835.
Meiran, N. (2000). Reconfiguration of stimulus task sets and response task sets during task switching. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 377–399). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Meiran, N., & Gotler, A. (2001). Modelling cognitive control in task switching and ageing. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 13, 165–186.
Meuter, R. F. I., & Allport, A. (1999). Bilingual language switching in naming: Asymmetrical costs of language selection. Journal of Memory & Language, 40, 25–40.
Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1997). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: I. Basic mechanisms. Psychological Review, 104, 3–65.
Monsell, S. (2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 134–140.
Monsell, S., Sumner, P., & Waters, H. (2003). Task-set reconfiguration with predictable and unpredictable task switches. Memory & Cognition, 31, 327–342.
Monsell, S., Yeung, N., & Azuma, R. (2000). Reconfiguration of task-set: Is it easier to switch to the weaker task? Psychological Research, 63, 250–264.
National Research Council (1990). Reports of the Committee on Vision, 1947–1990 (J. S. Albanes, Ed.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Newell, A., & Rosenbloom, P. (1981). Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the law of practice. In J. R. Anderson (Ed.), Cognitive skills and their acquisition (pp. 1–56). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Nieuwenhuis, S., & Monsell, S. (2002). Residual costs in task switching: Testing the failure-to-engage hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 86–92.
Pashler, H. (2000). Task switching and multitask performance (tutorial). In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 277–307). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207–231.
Rubinstein, J. S., Meyer, D. E., & Evans, J. E. (2001). Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27, 763–797.
Ruthruff, E., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (2001). Switching between simple cognitive tasks: The interaction of top-down and bottom-up factors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27, 1404–1419.
Salthouse, T. A. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychological Review, 103, 403–428.
Salthouse, T. A., & Coon, V. E. (1994). Interpretation of differential deficits: The case of aging and mental arithmetic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20, 1172–1182.
Schuch, S., & Koch, I. (2003). The role of response selection for inhibition of task sets in task shifting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 92–105.
Sliwinski, M. (1997). Aging and counting speed: Evidence for processspecific slowing. Psychology & Aging, 12, 38–49.
Sohn, M.-H., & Anderson, J. R. (2001). Task preparation and task repetition: Two-component model of task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 764–778.
Verhaeghen, P., & Cerella, J. (2002). Aging, executive control, and attention: A review of meta-analyses. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 26, 849–857.
Verhaeghen, P., Kliegl, R., & Mayr, U. (1997). Sequential and coordinative complexity in time-accuracy functions for mental arithmetic. Psychology & Aging, 12, 555–564.
Wechsler, D. (1981). The psychometric tradition: Developing the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. Contemporary Educational Psychologyw, 6, 82–85.
Wecker, N. S., Kramer, J. H., Hallam, B. J., & Delis, D. C.. (2005). Mental flexibility: Age effects on switching. Neuropsychology, 19, 345–352.
West, R. L. (1996). An application of prefrontal cortex function theory to cognitive aging. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 272–292.
Wylie, G., & Allport, A. (2000). Task switching and the measurement of “switch costs.” Psychological Research, 63, 212–233.
Yeung, N., & Monsell, S. (2003). The effects of recent practice on task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 919–936.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was made possible by Grant AG11451 from the National Institute of Aging to J.C. and W.J.H., and by fellowship support to N.G.B. by the Dr. Eric F. Gardner Memorial Foundation. The research reported in this article was conducted as part of N.G.B.’s doctoral dissertation submitted to Syracuse University.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Buchler, N.G., Hoyer, W.J. & Cerella, J. Rules and more rules: The effects of multiple tasks, extensive training, and aging on task-switching performance. Memory & Cognition 36, 735–748 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.4.735
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.4.735