Abstract
Two eyetracking experiments tested for activation of category coordinate and perceptually related concepts when speakers prepare the name of an object. Speakers saw four visual objects in a 2 3 2 array and identified and named a target picture on the basis of either category (e.g., “What is the name of the musical instrument?”) or visual-form (e.g., “What is the name of the circular object?”) instructions. There were more fixations on visualform competitors and category coordinate competitors than on unrelated objects during name preparation, but the increased overt attention did not affect naming latencies. The data demonstrate that eye movements are a sensitive measure of the overlap between the conceptual (including visual-form) information that is accessed in preparation for word production and the conceptual knowledge associated with visual objects. Furthermore, these results suggest that semantic activation of competitor concepts does not necessarily affect lexical selection, contrary to the predictions of lexical-selection-by-competition accounts (e.g., Levelt, Roelofs, & Meyer, 1999).
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdel Rahman, R. & Melinger, A. (2007). When bees hamper the production of honey: Lexical interference from associates in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 33, 604–614.
Alario, F.-X., Segui, J. & Ferrand, L. (2000). Semantic and associative priming in picture naming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 741–764.
Battig, W. F. & Montague, W. E. (1969). Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories: A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs, 80(3, Pt. 2).
Belke, E., Meyer, A. & Damian, M. F. (2005). Refractory effect in picture naming as assessed in a semantic blocking paradigm. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A, 667–692.
Bloem, I. & La Heij, W. (2003). Semantic facilitation and semantic interference in word translation: Implications for models of lexical access in language production. Journal of Memory & Language, 48, 468–488.
Bloem, I., van den Boogaard, S. & La Heij, W. (2004). Semantic facilitation and semantic interference in language production: Further evidence for the conceptual selection model of lexical access. Journal of Memory & Language, 51, 307–323.
Caramazza, A. & Costa, A. (2000). The semantic interference effect in the picture-word interference paradigm: Does the response set matter? Cognition, 75, B51-B64.
Caramazza, A. & Hillis, A. (1990). Where do semantic errors come from? Cortex, 26, 95–122.
Cattell, J. M. (1886). The time it takes to see and name objects. Mind, 11, 63–65.
Collins, A. M. & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407–428.
Collins, A. M. & Quillian, M. R. (1969). Retrieval time from semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 8, 240–247.
Cooper, R. M. (1974). The control of eye fixation by the meaning of spoken language: A new methodology for the real-time investigation of speech perception, memory, and language processing. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 84–107.
Costa, A., Alario, F.-X. & Caramazza, A. (2005). On the categorical nature of the semantic interference effect in the picture-word interference paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 125–131.
Cree, G. S. & McRae, K. (2003). Analyzing the factors underlying the structure and computation of the meaning of chipmunk, cherry, chisel, cheese, and cello (and many other such concrete nouns). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 163–201.
Dahan, D. & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2005). Looking at the rope when looking for the snake: Conceptually mediated eye movements during spoken-word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 453–459.
Damian, M. F. & Bowers, J. S. (2003). Locus of semantic interference in picture-word interference tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 111–117.
Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283–321.
Fay, D. A. & Cutler, A. (1977). Malapropisms and the structure of the mental lexicon. Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 505–520.
Finkbeiner, M. & Caramazza, A. (2006). Lexical selection is not a competitive process: A reply to La Heij et al. (2006). Cortex, 42, 1032–1035.
Glaser, W. R. & Glaser, M. O. (1989). Context effects in Stroop-like word and picture processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 13–42.
Griffin, Z. M. (2004). Why look? Reasons for eye movements related to language production. In J. M. Henderson & F. Ferreira (Eds.), The interface of language, vision, and action: Eye movements and the visual world (pp. 213–248). New York: Psychology Press.
Griffin, Z. M. & Bock, K. (1998). Constraint, word frequency, and the relationship between processing levels in spoken word production. Journal of Memory & Language, 38, 313–338.
Hantsch, A., Jescheniak, J. D. & Schriefers, H. (2005). Semantic competition between hierarchically related words during speech planning. Memory & Cognition, 33, 984–1000.
Hartsuiker, R. J., Pickering, M. J. & De Jong, N. H. (2005). Semantic and phonological context effects in speech error repair. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31, 921–932.
Huettig, F. & Altmann, G. T. M. (2004). The on-line processing of ambiguous and unambiguous words in context: Evidence from headmounted eyetracking. In M. Carreiras & C. Clifton, Jr. (Eds.), The online study of sentence comprehension: Eyetracking, ERPs and beyond (pp. 187–207). New York: Psychology Press.
Huettig, F. & Altmann, G. T. M. (2005). Word meaning and the control of eye fixation: Semantic competitor effects and the visual world paradigm. Cognition, 96, B23-B32.
Huettig, F. & Altmann, G. T. M. (2007). Visual-shape competition during language-mediated attention is based on lexical input and not modulated by contextual appropriateness. Visual Cognition, 15, 985–1018.
Huettig, F. & McQueen, J. M. (2007). The tug of war between phonological, semantic and shape information in language-mediated visual search. Journal of Memory & Language, 57, 460–482.
Huettig, F., Quinlan, P. T., McDonald, S. A. & Altmann, G. T. M. (2006). Models of high-dimensional semantic space predict languagemediated eye movements in the visual world. Acta Psychologica, 121, 65–80.
Indefrey, P. & Levelt, W. J. M. (2004). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition, 92, 101–144.
Klopfer, D. S. (1996). Stroop interference and color-word similarity. Psychological Science, 7, 150–157.
La Heij, W., Heikoop, K. W., Akerboom, S. & Bloem, I. (2003). Picture naming in picture context: Semantic interference or semantic facilitation? Psychology Science, 45, 49–62.
La Heij, W., Kuipers, J.-R. & Starreveld, P. A. (2006). In defense of the lexical-competition account of picture-word interference: A comment on Finkbeiner and Caramazza (2006). Cortex, 42, 1028–1031.
Landauer, T. K. & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211–240.
Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A. & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 22, 1–75.
Mahon, B. Z., Costa, A., Peterson, R., Vargas, K. A. & Caramazza, A. (2007). Lexical selection is not by competition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 33, 503–533.
McDonald, S. A. (2000). Environmental determinants of lexical processing effort. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Edinburgh, Scotland. Retrieved December 10, 2004, from www.inf.ed.ac.uk/ publications/thesis/online/IP000007.pdf.
Meyer, A. S. (2004). The use of eye tracking in studies of sentence generation. In J. M. Henderson & F. Ferreira (Eds.), The interface of language, vision, and action: Eye movements and the visual world (pp. 191–212). New York: Psychology Press.
Meyer, A. S., Sleiderink, A. M. & Levelt, W. J. M. (1998). Viewing and naming objects: Eye movements during noun phrase production. Cognition, 66, B25-B33.
Miozzo, M. & Caramazza, A. (2003). When more is less: A counterintuitive effect of distractor frequency in the picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 228–258.
Morsella, E. & Miozzo, M. (2002). Evidence for a cascade model of lexical access in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 28, 555–563.
Peterson, R. R. & Savoy, P. (1998). Lexical selection and phonological coding during language production: Evidence for cascaded processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 539–557.
Roelofs, A. (1992). A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking. Cognition, 42, 107–142.
Roelofs, A. (1993). Testing a non-decompositional theory of lemma retrieval in speaking: Retrieval of verbs. Cognition, 47, 59–87.
Roelofs, A. (1997). The WEAVER model of word-form encoding in speech production. Cognition, 64, 249–284.
Roelofs, A. (2001). Set size and repetition matter: Comment on Caramazza and Costa (2000). Cognition, 80, 283–290.
Roelofs, A. (2003). Goal-referenced selection of verbal action: Modeling attentional control in the Stroop task. Psychological Review, 110, 88–125.
Schriefers, H., Meyer, A. S. & Levelt, W. J. M. (1990). Exploring the time-course of lexical access in language production: Picture-word interference studies. Journal of Memory & Language, 29, 86–102.
Severens, E., Van Lommel, S., Ratinckx, E. & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2005). Timed picture naming norms for 590 pictures in Dutch. Acta Psychologica, 199, 159–187.
Starreveld, P. A. & La Heij, W. (1995). Semantic interference, orthographic facilitation, and their interaction in naming tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 686–698.
Starreveld, P. A. & La Heij, W. (1996). Time-course analysis of semantic and orthographic context effects in picture naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 896–918.
Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M., & Sedivy, J. C. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268, 1632–1634.
Van der Meulen, F. F., Meyer, A. S. & Levelt, W. J. M. (2001). Eye movements during the production of nouns and pronouns. Memory & Cognition, 29, 512–521.
Van Overschelde, J. P., Rawson, K. A. & Dunlosky, J. (2004). Category norms: An updated and expanded version of the Battig and Montague (1969) norms. Journal of Memory & Language, 50, 289–335.
Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Lewis, W. & Garrett, M. F. (2004). Representing the meanings of object and action words: The featural and unitary semantic space hypothesis. Cognitive Psychology, 48, 422–488.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was sponsored by a grant from FWO, the Fund for Research-Flanders (G.0181.05). Parts were presented at the AMLaP 2006 conference in Nijmegen, The Netherlands, and the AMLaP 2007 conference in Turku, Finland.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Huettig, F., Hartsuiker, R.J. When you name the pizza you look at the coin and the bread: Eye movements reveal semantic activation during word production. Memory & Cognition 36, 341–360 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.2.341
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.2.341