Abstract
Whether having an intention produces a performance cost to ongoing activities (task interference) is central to theoretical claims regarding the mechanisms underlying cue detection in event-based prospective memory. Recent evidence suggests that task interference primarily reflects an attention allocation policy stored in memory when intentions are encoded. The present study examined whether these policies can change with ongoing task experience. In Experiment 1, task interference was more greatly reduced when expected cues were not presented than when they were. Experiment 2 replicated this effect when the importance of the prospective memory task was emphasized. In Experiment 3, task interference decreased with time, and this decrease was greater when expected cues were not presented than when they were. Cue presentation is crucial to maintenance of attention allocation policies established by task instructions. This is the first article to demonstrate changes in task interference with ongoing task experience without forewarning individuals of the relevance of upcoming ongoing task trials to intentions.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, J. R. (1991). Is human cognition adaptive? Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 14, 471–517.
Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54, 462–479.
Dennis, S. (1995). The impact of the environment on the word frequency and null list strength effects in recognition memory. Noetica: Open Forum, 1. Retrieved March 5, 2004, from psy.uq.edu .au/CogPsych/Noetica.
Dismukes, R. K. (2007). Prospective memory in aviation and everyday settings. To appear in M. Kliegel, M. A. McDaniel, & G. O. Einstein (Eds.), Prospective memory: Cognitive, neuroscience, developmental, and applied perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (1990). Normal aging and prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 717–726.
Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (2005). Prospective memory: Multiple retrieval processes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 286–290.
Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., Thomas, R., Mayfield, S., Shank, H., Morrisette, N., & Breneiser, J. (2005). Multiple processes in prospective memory retrieval: Factors determining monitoring versus spontaneous retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 327–342.
Estes, W. K. (1950). Toward a statistical theory of learning. Psychological Review, 57, 94–107.
Goschke, T., & Kuhl, J. (1993). Representation of intentions: Perallow sisting activation in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19, 1211–1226.
Guynn, M. J. (2003). A two-process model of strategic monitoring in event-based prospective memory: Activation/retrieval mode and checking. International Journal of Psychology, 38, 245–256.
Hicks, J. L., Marsh, R. L., & Cook, G. I. (2005). Task interference in time-based, event-based, and dual intention prospective memory conditions. Journal of Memory & Language, 53, 430–444.
Hunt, R. R., & Toth, J. P. (1990). Perceptual identification, fragment completion, and free recall: Concepts and data. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 282–290.
Kliegel, M., Martin, M., McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (2004). Importance effects on performance in event-based prospective memory tasks. Memory, 12, 553–561.
Lebiere, C., & Lee, F. J. (2001). Intention superiority effect: A contextsensitivity account. In E. M. Altmann, A. Cleeremans, C. D. Schunn, & W. D. Gray (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2001 Fourth International Conference on Cognitive Modeling (pp. 139–144). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Loft, S., Humphreys, M., & Neal, A. (2003). Prospective memory in air traffic control. In G. Edkins & P. Pfister (Eds.), Innovation & Consolidation in Aviation, pp. 287–293. Aldershot, U.K.: Ashgate.
Loft, S., Humphreys, M., & Whitney, S. (in press). Control of access to memory: The use of task interference as a behavioural probe. Journal of Memory & Language.
Loft, S., & Yeo, G. (2007). An investigation into the resource requirements of event-based prospective memory. Memory & Cognition, 35, 263–274.
Marsh, R. L., Cook, G. I., & Hicks, J. L. (2006). Task interference from event-based intentions can be material specific. Memory & Cognition, 34, 1636–1643.
Marsh, R. L., & Hicks, J. L. (1998). Event-based prospective memory and executive control of working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 336–349.
Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., & Cook, G. I. (2005). On the relationship between effort toward an ongoing task and cue detection in event-based prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31, 68–75.
Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., & Cook, G. I. (2006). Task interference from prospective memories covaries with contextual associations of fulfilling them. Memory & Cognition, 34, 1037–1045.
Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., Cook, G. I., Hansen, J. S., & Pallos, A. L. (2003). Interference to ongoing activities covaries with the characteristics of an event-based intention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 861–870.
McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (2007). Prospective memory: An overview and synthesis of an emerging field. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
McDaniel, M. A., Guynn, M. J., Einstein, G. O., & Breneiser, J. (2004). Cue-focused and reflexive-associative processes in prospective memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30, 605–614.
Pirolli, P., & Card, S. (1999). Information foraging. Psychological Review, 106, 643–675.
Schneider, A., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime reference guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.
Simon, H. A. (1956). Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review, 63, 129–138.
Smith, R. E. (2003). The cost of remembering to remember in eventbased prospective memory: Investigating the capacity demands of delayed intention performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 347–361.
Smith, R. E., & Bayen, U. J. (2004). A multinomial model of eventbased prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30, 756–777.
Smith, R. E., Hunt, R. R., McVay, J. C., & McConnell, M. D. (2007). The cost of event-based prospective memory: Salient target events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 33, 734–746.
Tulving, E. (1983). Elements of episodic memory. New York: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Loft, S., Kearney, R. & Remington, R. Is task interference in event-based prospective memory dependent on cue presentation?. Memory & Cognition 36, 139–148 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.1.139
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.1.139