Abstract
Although most studies of perceptual learning in human participants have concentrated on the changes in perception assumed to be occurring, studies of nonhuman animals necessarily measure discrimination learning and generalization and remain agnostic on the question of whether changes in behavior reflect changes in perception. On the other hand, animal studies do make it easier to draw a distinction between supervised and unsupervised learning. Differential reinforcement will surely teach animals to attend to some features of a stimulus array rather than to others. But it is an open question as to whether such changes in attention underlie the enhanced discrimination seen after unreinforced exposure to such an array. I argue that most instances of unsupervised perceptual learning observed in animals (and at least some in human animals) are better explained by appeal to well-established principles and phenomena of associative learning theory: excitatory and inhibitory associations between stimulus elements, latent inhibition, and habituation.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Alonso, G., & Hall, G. (1999). Stimulus comparison and stimulus association processes in the perceptual learning effect. Behavioural Processes, 48, 11–23.
Bennett, C. H., & Mackintosh, N. J. (1999). Comparison and contrast as a mechanism of perceptual learning? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52B, 253–272.
Blair, C. A. J., & Hall, G. (2003). Perceptual learning in flavor aversion: Evidence for learned changes in stimulus effectiveness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 29, 39–48.
Blair, C. A. J., Wilkinson, A., & Hall, G. (2004). Assessments of changes in the effective salience of stimulus elements as a result of stimulus preexposure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 30, 317–324.
Dwyer, D. M., Bennett, C. H., & Mackintosh, N. J. (2001). Evidence for inhibitory associations between the unique elements of two compound flavors. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54B, 97–108.
Dwyer, D. M., & Honey, R. C. (2007). The effects of habituation training on compound conditioning are not reversed by an associative activation treatment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 33, 185–190.
Dwyer, D. M., & Mackintosh, N. J. (2002). Alternating exposure to two compound flavors creates inhibitory associations between their unique features. Learning & Behavior, 30, 201–207.
Fahle, M. (2002a). Introduction. In M. Fahle & T. Poggio (Eds.), Perceptual learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Bradford Books.
Fahle, M. (2002b). Learning to perceive features below the foveal photoreceptor spacing. In M. Fahle & T. Poggio (Eds.), Perceptual learning (pp. 197–218). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Bradford Books.
Gibson, E. J. (1969). Principles of perceptual learning and development. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Gibson, E. J., & Walk, R. D. (1956). The effect of prolonged exposure to visually presented patterns on learning to discriminate them. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 49, 239–242.
Hall, G. (1980). Exposure learning in animals. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 535–550.
Hall, G. (1991). Perceptual and associative learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.
Hall, G. (2003). Learned changes in the sensitivity of stimulus representations: Associative and nonassociative mechanisms. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56B, 43–55.
Hall, G. (2009). Perceptual learning in human and nonhuman animals: A search for common ground. Learning & Behavior, 37, 133–140.
Hall, G., & Rodriguez, G. (in press). Factors determining the effects of associative activation on habituation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes.
Honey, R. C., & Bateson, P. (1996). Stimulus comparison and perceptual learning: Further evidence and evaluation from an imprinting procedure. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49B, 259–269.
Honey, R. C., Bateson, P., & Horn, G. (1994). The role of stimulus comparison in perceptual learning: An investigation with the domestic chick. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47B, 83–103.
James, W. (1890). Principles of psychology. New York: Holt.
Kruschke, J. K. (2001). Toward a unified model of attention in associative learning. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 45, 812–863
Lawrence, D. H. (1952). The transfer of a discrimination along a continuum. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 45, 511- 516.
Le Pelley, M. E. (2004). The role of associative history in models of associative learning: A selective review and a hybrid model. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57B, 193–243.
Lovejoy, E. (1968). Attention in discrimination learning. San Francisco: Holden-Day.
Mackintosh, N. J. (1975). A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement. Psychological Review, 82, 276–298.
Mackintosh, N. J., Kaye, H., & Bennett, C. H. (1991). Perceptual learning in flavour aversion conditioning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43B, 297–322.
McLaren, I. P. L., Kaye, H., & Mackintosh, N. J. (1989). An associative theory of the representation of stimuli: Applications to perceptual learning and latent inhibition. In R. G. M. Morris (Ed.), Parallel distributed processing: Implications for psychology and neurobiology (pp. 102–130). Oxford: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.
McLaren, I. P. L., Leevers, H. L., & Mackintosh, N. J. (1994). Recognition, categorization and perceptual learning. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 889–909). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
McLaren, I. P. L., & Mackintosh, N. J. (2000). An elemental model of associative learning: I. Latent inhibition and perceptual learning. Learning & Behavior, 28, 211–246.
Mitchell, C., Kadib, R., Nash, S., Lavis, Y., & Hall, G. (2008). Analysis of the role of associative inhibition in perceptual learning by means of the same-different task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 34, 475–485.
Mollon, J. D., & Danilova, M. V. (1996). Three remarks on perceptual learning. Spatial Vision, 10, 51–58.
Mondragón, E., & Hall, G. (2002). Analysis of the perceptual learning effect in flavour aversion learning: Evidence for stimulus differentiation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55B, 153–169.
Mundy, M. E., Dwyer, D. M., & Honey, R. C. (2006). Inhibitory associations contribute to perceptual learning in humans. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 32, 178–184.
Mundy, M. E., Honey, R. C., & Dwyer, D. M. (2007). Simultaneous presentation of similar stimuli produces perceptual learning in human picture processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 33, 124–138.
Pavlov, I. P. (1927). Conditioned reflexes (G. V. Anrep, Trans.). London: Oxford University Press.
Prados, J., Artigas, A. A., & Sansa, J. (2007). Preexposure effects in the spatial domain: Dissociation between latent inhibition and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 33, 115–123.
Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64–99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Scahill, V. L., & Mackintosh, N. J. (2004). The easy to hard effect and perceptual learning in flavor aversion conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 30, 93–103.
Sutherland, N. S., & Mackintosh, N. J. (1971). Mechanisms of animal discrimination learning. New York: Academic Press.
Symonds, M., & Hall, G. (1995). Perceptual learning in flavor aversion conditioning: Roles of stimulus comparison and latent inhibition of common elements. Learning & Motivation, 26, 203–219.
Tsushima, Y., & Watanabe, T. (2009). Roles of attention in perceptual learning from perspectives of psychophysics and animal learning. Learning & Behavior, 37, 126–132.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Most of the ideas expressed here are really Ian McLaren’s, and the original experimental work was undertaken by Claire Bennett, Dominic Dwyer, and Vicky Scahill. I am indebted to them all.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mackintosh, N.J. Varieties of perceptual learning. Learning & Behavior 37, 119–125 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3758/LB.37.2.119
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/LB.37.2.119