Abstract
We studied transposition in pigeons by training them to select the smaller (or the larger) of a pair of circles. In training, different groups of pigeons were given one pair, two pairs, or three pairs of circles along the size dimension. Testing included two stimulus pairs for which, according to theoretical postdiscrimination generalization gradients, transposition should decrease from one-pair to two-pair to three-pair training. On the basis of the results of our earlier study (Lazareva, Wasserman, & Young, 2005) and contrary to these predictions, we expected that transposition should increase from one-pair to two-pair to three-pair training. We found that multiple-pair discrimination training enhanced transposition, which, on average, rose from 47% (one-pair training) to 52% (two-pair training) to 64% (three-pair training). In addition, we found that the overall similarity of the testing pair to the training pair(s) modulated the strength of relational responding. These results demonstrate that encountering multiple instances of a rule leads to stronger relational learning, even when reinforcement history predicts the opposite trend. These results also provide strong evidence against stimulus generalization as the sole determinant of relational responding in transposition.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blough, D. S. (1969). Generalization gradient shape and summation in steady-state tests. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 91–104.
Cheng, K., Spetch, M. L., & Johnston, M. (1997). Spatial peak shift and generalization in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 23, 469–481.
Ehrenfreund, D. (1952). A study of the transposition gradient. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43, 81–87.
Gulliksen, H., & Wolfle, D. L. (1938). A theory of learning and transfer: I. Psychometrika, 3, 127–149.
Hanson, H. M. (1959). Effects of discrimination training on stimulus generalization. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 321–334.
Hearst, E. (1969). Excitation, inhibition, and discrimination learning. In N. J. Mackintosh & W. K. Honig (Eds.), Fundamental issues in associative learning: Proceedings of a symposium held at Dalhousie University, Halifax, June 1968 (pp. 1–41). Halifax: Dalhousie University Press.
Honig, W. K. (1962). Prediction of preference, transposition, and transposition-reversal from the generalization gradient. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 239–248.
Honig, W. K., & Urcuioli, P. J. (1981). The legacy of Guttman and Kalish (1956): 25 years of research on stimulus generalization. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 36, 405–445.
Johnson, R. C., & Zara, R. C. (1960). Relational learning in young children. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 53, 594–597.
Kalish, H. I., & Guttman, N. (1959). Stimulus generalization after training on three stimuli: A test of the summation hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 268–272.
Kendler, T. S. (1950). An experimental investigation of transposition as a function of the difference between training and test stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40, 552–562.
Klüver, H. (1933). Behavior mechanisms in monkeys. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Köhler, W. (1938). Simple structural functions in the chimpanzee and in the chicken. In W. D. Ellis (Ed.), A source book of Gestalt psychology (pp. 217–227). London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner, & Co. (Original work published 1918)
Larsen, A., & Bundesen, C. (1978). Size scaling in visual pattern recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 4, 1–20.
Lawrence, D. H., & DeRivera, J. (1954). Evidence for relational transposition. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 47, 465–471.
Lazareva, O. F., Wasserman, E. A., & Young, M. E. (2005). Transposition in pigeons: Reassessing Spence (1937) with multiple discrimination training. Learning & Behavior, 33, 22–46.
Luce, R. D. (1959). Individual choice behavior: A theoretical analysis. New York: Wiley.
Mackintosh, N. J. (1974). The psychology of animal learning. London: Academic Press.
Marsh, G. (1967). Relational learning in the pigeon. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 64, 519–521.
Peissig, J. J., Kirkpatrick, K., Young, M. E., Wasserman, E. A., & Biederman, I. (2006). Effects of varying stimulus size on object recognition in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 32, 419–430.
Purtle, R. B. (1973). Peak shift: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 80, 408–421.
Reese, H. W. (1968). The perception of stimulus relations: Discrimination learning and transposition. New York: Academic Press.
Rescorla, R. A. (1969). Pavlovian conditioned inhibition. Psychological Bulletin, 72, 77–94.
Riley, D. A. (1958). The nature of the effective stimulus in animal discrimination learning: Transposition reconsidered. Psychological Review, 65, 1–7.
Riley, D. A. (1968). Discrimination learning. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Rilling, M. (1977). Stimulus control and inhibitory processes. In W. K. Honig & J. E. R. Staddon (Eds.), Handbook of operant behavior (pp. 432–480). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Shepard, R. N. (1987). Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. Science, 237, 1317–1323.
Sherman, M., & Strunk, J. (1964). Transposition as a function of single versus double discrimination training. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 58, 449–450.
Spence, K. W. (1937). The differential response in animals to stimuli varying within a single dimension. Psychological Review, 44, 430–444.
Spence, K. W. (1938). “Relative” vs. “absolute” size discrimination by chimpanzees. Psychological Bulletin, 35, 505.
Spetch, M. L., Cheng, K., & Clifford, C. W. G. (2004). Peak shift but not range effects in recognition of faces. Learning & Motivation, 35, 221–241.
Stevenson, H. W., & Bitterman, M. E. (1955). The distance-effect in the transposition of intermediate size of children. American Journal of Psychology, 68, 274–279.
Wasserman, E. A., Hugart, J. A., & Kirkpatrick-Steger, K. (1995). Pigeons show same-different conceptualization after training with complex visual stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 21, 248–252.
Wills, S., & Mackintosh, N. J. (1999). Relational learning in pigeons? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52B, 31–52.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lazareva, O.F., Miner, M., Wasserman, E.A. et al. Multiple-pair training enhances transposition in pigeons. Learning & Behavior 36, 174–187 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/LB.36.3.174
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/LB.36.3.174