Abstract
Descriptive symmetry and evaluative aesthetic judgment processes were compared using identical stimuli in both judgment tasks. Electrophysiological activity was recorded while participants judged novel formal graphic patterns in a trial-by-trial cuing setting using binary responses (symmetric, not symmetric; beautiful, not beautiful). Judgment analyses of a Phase 1 test and main experiment performance resulted in individual models, as well as group models, of the participants’ judgment systems. Symmetry showed a strong positive correlation with beautiful judgments and was the most important cue. Descriptive judgments were performed faster than evaluative judgments. The ERPs revealed a phasic, early frontal negativity for the not-beautiful judgments. A sustained posterior negativity was observed in the symmetric condition. All conditions showed late positive potentials (LPPs). Evaluative judgment LPPs revealed a more pronounced right lateralization. It is argued that the present aesthetic judgments engage a two-stage process consisting of early, anterior frontomedian impression formation after 300 msec and right-hemisphere evaluative categorization around 600 msec after onset of the graphic patterns.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Electroencephalographic Society (1991). American Electroencephalographic Society guidelines for standard electrode position nomenclature. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 8, 200–202.
Ashby, F. G., Isen, A. M., & Turken, A. U. (1999). A neuropsychological theory of positive affect and its influence on cognition. Psychological Review, 106, 529–550.
Berlyne, D. E. (1963). Complexity and incongruity variables as determinants of exploratory choice and evaluative ratings. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 17, 274–290.
Berlyne, D. E. (1970). Novelty, complexity, and hedonic value. Perception & Psychophysics, 8, 279–286.
Berlyne, D. E. (1971). Aesthetics and psychobiology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Berlyne, D. E. (Ed.) (1974). Studies in the new experimental aesthetics: Steps toward an objective psychology of aesthetic appreciation. Washington, DC: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation.
Brehmer, B., & Joyce, R. B. (Eds.) (1988). Human judgment: The SJT view. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Cacioppo, J. T., & Berntson, G. G. (1994). Relationships between attitudes and evaluative space: A critical review, with emphasis on the separability of positive and negative substrates. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 401–423.
Cacioppo, J. T., Crites, S. L., Berntson, G. G., & Coles, M. G. H. (1993). If attitudes affect how stimuli are processed, should not they affect the event-related brain potential? Psychological Science, 4, 108–112.
Cacioppo, J. T., Crites, S. L., & Gardner, W. L. (1996). Attitudes to the right: Evaluative processing is associated with lateralized late positive event-related brain potentials. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1205–1219.
Cacioppo, J. T., Crites, S. L., Gardner, W. L., & Berntson, G. G. (1994). Bioelectrical echoes from evaluative categorizations: I. A late positive brain potential that varies as a function of trait negativity and extremity. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 67, 115–125.
Cooksey, R. W. (1996). Judgment analysis: Theory, methods, and applications. San Diego: Academic Press.
Crites, S. L., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1996). Electrocortical differentiation of evaluative and nonevaluative categorizations. Psychological Science, 7, 318–321.
Crites, S. L., Cacioppo, J. T., Gardner, W. L., & Berntson, G. G. (1995). Bioelectrical echoes from evaluative categorization: II. A late positive brain potential that varies as a function of attitude registration rather than attitude report. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 68, 997–1013.
Cupchik, G. C. (1992). From perception to production: A multilevel analysis of the aesthetic process. In G. C. Cupchik & J. Laszlo (Eds.), Emerging visions of the aesthetic process (pp. 183–199). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eisenman, R. (1967). Complexity-simplicity: I. Preference for symmetry and rejection of complexity. Psychonomic Science, 8, 169–170.
Eisenman, R., & Gellens, H. K. (1968). Preference for complexity-simplicity and symmetry-asymmetry. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 26, 888–890.
Eysenck, H. J., & Hawker, G. W. (1994). The taxonomy of visual aesthetic preferences: An empirical study. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 12, 95–101.
Fechner, G. T. (1876). Vorschule der Aesthetik [Experimental Aesthetics; “Pre-school” of aesthetics]. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel.
Gardner, H. (1985). The mind’s new science. A history of the cognitive revolution. New York: Basic Books.
Hammond, K. R., Stewart, T. R., Brehmer, B., & Steinmann, D. O. (1975). Social judgment theory. In M. F. Kaplan & S. Schwartz (Eds.), Human judgment and decision processes (pp. 271–312). New York: Academic Press.
Hastie, R. (2001). Problems for judgment and decision making. Annual Reviews of Psychology, 52, 653–683.
Ito, T. A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1999). The psychophysiology of utility appraisals. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Wellbeing: Foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 470–488). New York: Russell Sage.
Ito, T. A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2000). Electrophysiological evidence of implicit and explicit categorization processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 660–676.
Ito, T. A., Larsen, J. T., Smith, N. K., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1998). Negative information weighs more heavily on the brain: The negativity bias in evaluative categorizations. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 75, 887–900.
Jacobsen, T. (2002). Kandinsky’s questionnaire revisited: Fundamental correspondence of basic colors and forms? Perceptual & Motor Skills, 95, 903–913.
Jacobsen, T. (2004). Individual and group modeling of aesthetic judgment strategies. British Journal of Psychology, 95, 41–56.
Jacobsen, T., & Höfel, L. (2001). Aesthetics electrified: An analysis of descriptive symmetry and evaluative aesthetic judgment processes using event-related brain potentials. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 19, 177–190.
Jacobsen, T., & Höfel, L. (2002). Aesthetic judgments of novel graphic patterns: Analyses of individual judgments. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 95, 755–766.
Kersteen-Tucker, Z. (1991). Long-term repetition priming with symmetrical polygons and words. Memory & Cognition, 19, 37–43.
Konecni, V. J. (1979). Determinants of aesthetic preference and effects of exposure to aesthetic stimuli: Social, emotional and cognitive factors. Progress in Experimental Personality Research, 9, 149–197.
Mandler, G. (1982). The structure of value: Accounting for tastes. In M. S. Clark & S. T. Fiske (Eds.), Affect and cognition: The seventh annual Carnegie symposium on cognition (pp. 3–36). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Mandler, G., & Shebo, B. J. (1983). Knowing and liking. Motivation & Emotion, 7, 125–144.
Martindale, C. (1988). Aesthetics, psychobiology, and cognition. In F. H. Farley & R. W. Neperud (Eds.), The foundation of aesthetics, art and art education (pp. 7–42). New York: Praeger.
McCall, W. A. (1939). Measurement. New York: Macmillan.
McCarthy, G., & Wood, C. C. (1985). Scalp distributions of eventrelated potentials: An ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 62, 203–208.
Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97–113.
Park, N.W., Conrod, B., Rewilak, D., Kwon, C., Gao, F., & Black, S. E. (2001). Automatic activation of positive but not negative attitudes after traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychologia, 39, 7–24.
Pashler, H. (1990). Coordinate frame for symmetry detection and object recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 150–163.
Petty, R. E., Wegener, D. T., & Fabrigar, L. R. (1997). Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 609–647.
Ritterfeld, U. (2002). Social heuristics in interior design preferences. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 22, 369–386.
Russell, J. A., & Carroll, J. M. (1999). On the bipolarity of positive and negative affect. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 3–30.
Schupp, H. T., Cuthbert, B. N., Bradley, M. M., Cacioppo, J. T., Ito, T., & Lang, P. J. (2000). Affective picture processing: The late positive potential is modulated by motivational relevance. Psychophysiology, 37, 257–261.
Schwarz, N. (1988). Stimmung als Information: Zum Einfluss von Stimmungen und Emotionen auf evaluative Urteile [Mood as information: The influence of moods and emotions on evaluative judgments]. Psychologische Rundschau, 39, 148–159.
Stewart, T. R. (1988). Judgment analysis: Procedures. In B. Brehmer & C. R. B. Joyce (Eds.), Human judgment: The SJT view (pp. 41–74). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
van der Zwan, R., Leo, E., Joung, W., Latimer, C., & Wenderoth, P. (1998). Evidence that both area V1 and extrastriate visual cortex contribute to symmetry perception. Current Biology, 8, 889–892.
Wenderoth, P. (1994). The salience of vertical symmetry. Perception, 23, 221–236.
Whitfield, A. (1984). Individual differences in evaluation of architectural colour: Categorization effects. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 59, 183–186.
Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 151–175.
Zysset, S., Huber, O., Ferstl, E. [C.], & von Cramon, D. Y. (2002). The anterior frontomedian cortex and evaluative judgment: An fMRI study. NeuroImage, 15, 983–991.
Zysset, S., Huber, O., Samson, A., Ferstl, E. C., & von Cramon, D.Y. (2003). Functional specialization within the anterior medial prefrontal cortex: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study with human subjects. Neuroscience Letters, 335, 183–186.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Aspects of this work were reported at the XVI Congress of the International Association of Empirical Aesthetics and appeared in the conference special issue of Empirical Studies of the Arts, 19(2), 2001. This work was partly supported by DFG Grant JA1009/2-1.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jacobsen, T., Höfel, L. Descriptive and evaluative judgment processes: Behavioral and electrophysiological indices of processing symmetry and aesthetics. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 3, 289–299 (2003). https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.3.4.289
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.3.4.289